Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Strategic decision-making criteria and process of top management on technology adoption in the travel agency industry

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Information Technology & Tourism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability to adopt new technology is vital to the performance and long-term growth of an organization. Contemporary technology adoption process models are primarily conceived from only the technology point of view and are seldom linked to an organization’s strategy and performance. Technology adoption that entails the commitment of substantial resources is typically viewed as a strategic decision by top management. This study surveys and interviews the top management teams (TMTs) of travel industry firms in non-IT roles. The findings indicate that TMTs regard the ability of technology to generate revenue and reduce costs as the main criteria for its adoption. These criteria, and the duration and political behavior of the decision process, were observed to affect organizational performance. This study also examines the major problems faced in technology adoption and ways to address them from the perspective of TMTs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aral S, Weill P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: how resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ Sci 18(5):763–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon CJ (1992) The use of decision criteria in selecting information systems/technology investments. MIS Q 16(3):335–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP (2007) The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J Assoc Inf Syst 8(4):244–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay DW, Higgins CA, Thompson R (1995) The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as illustration. Technol Stud 2(2):285–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum JR, Wally S (2003) Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 24:1107–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell GG, Bromiley P, Bryson J (1998) Spinning a complex web: links between strategic decision making context, content, process and outcome. In: Papadakis V, Barwise P (eds) Strategic decisions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, pp 163–178 (Reprinted from Jan 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois LJ III, Eisenhardt KM (1988) Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: four cases in the microcomputer industry. Manage Sci 34:816–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower JL, Hout TM (1988) Fast-cycle capability for competitive power. Harvard Bus Rev 66(6):110–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher D, Clarke M (1999) Organizational politics: the missing discipline of management. Ind Commer Train 31(1):9–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey R, Kang D, Zea M (2012) The trouble with travel distribution McKinsey Quarterly. McKinsey & Company, pp 2–7

  • Chau PYK, Hui KL (2001) Determinants of small business EDI adoption: an empirical investigation. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 11(4):229–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng V, Rhodes J, Lok P (2010) A framework for strategic decision making and performance among Chinese managers. Int J Hum Resour Manag 21(9):1373–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA (ed) Modern methods for business research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Nahwah, pp 295–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwelos P, Benbasat I, Dexter AS (2001) Research report: empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Inf Syst Res 12(3):304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemons EK, Weber BW (1990) Strategic information technology investments: guidelines for decision making. J Manag Inf Syst 7(2):9–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean JWJ, Sharfman MP (1996) Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Acad Manag J 39(2):368–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney JT, Huselid MA (1996) The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Acad Manag J 39(4):949–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess GG, Robinson RBJ (1984) Measuring organization performance in the absense of objective measures: the case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strateg Manag J 5:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad Manag J 32:543–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Bourgeois LJ III (1988) Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: toward a midrange theory. Acad Manag J 31(4):737–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Zbaracki MJ (1992) Strategic decision making. Strateg Manag J 13:17–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emam KE and Koru AG (2008) A replicated survey of software project failures. IEEE Software, Sept/Oct 84–90

  • Fredrickson JW (1984) The comprehensiveness of strategic decsion processe: extension, observations, future directions. Acad Manag J 27:445–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geisser S (1974) A predictor approach to the random effects model. Biometrika 61(1):101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1976) New rules of sociological method. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandon EE, Pearson JM (2004) Electronic commerce adoption: an empirical study of small and medium US businesses. Inf Manag 42:197–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Market Theory Pract 19(2):139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manag Rev 9(2):193–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Harzing A-W (2000) Cross-national industrial mail surveys: why do response rates differ between countries? Ind Mark Manage 29:243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler J, Ringle CM and Sinkovics RR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In: Sinkovics RR, Ghauri PN (Eds.) Advances in international marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited (Vol. 20 New Challenges to International Marketing), pp 277–319

  • Hoch SJ, Kunreuther HC, Gunther RE (2001) Wharton on making decisions. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu PF, Kraemer KL, Dunkle D (2006) Determinants of e-business use in US firms. Int J Electron Commer 10(4):9–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek R, Ahearne M, Mathieu J, Schillewaert N (2006) A longitudinal examination of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on sales technology adoption and job performance. J Market Theory Pract 14(1):7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacovou CL, Benbasat I, Dexter AS (1995) Electronic data interchange and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology. MIS Q 19(4):465–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D (2002) The place of organizational politics in strategic change. Strateg Change 11:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen K, Damsgaard J (1995) Diffusion theory: Complex technologies, institutional arenas and time: Notes of diffusion research IFIP 8.6 Working Conference. Oslo

  • Mayes BT, Allen RW (1977) Toward a definition of organizational politics. Academy of Management Review, Oct 672–678

  • Mintzberg H, Rainsinghani D, Theoret A (1976) The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes. Adm Sci Q 21:246–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller GC, Mone MA, Barker VL III (2007) Formal strategic analyses and organizational performance: decomposing the rational model. Organ Stud 28(6):853–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabeel A-Q (2005) An empirical investigation of an e-commerce adoption—capability model in small businesses in New Zealand. Electron Markets 15:418–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ Sci 3(3):398–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ, Robey D (1991) Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Inf Syst Res 2(2):143–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou PA, Fygenson M (2006) Understanding and prediction electronic commerce adoption: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Q 30(1):115–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell TC, Dent-Micallef A (1997) Information technology as a competitive advantage: the role of human, business and technology role resources. Strateg Manag J 18(5):375–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prekumar G, Ramamurthy K, Crum M (1997) Determinants of EDI adoption in the transportaion industry. Eur J Inf Syst 6:107–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JB (1980) Strategies for change: logical incrementalism. Irwin, Homewood

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopalan N, Rasheed AMA, Datta DK (1993) Strategic decision processes: critical review and future directions. J Manag 19(2):349–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringle CM, Sven W and Alexander W (2005) SmartPLS 2.0.M3. Hamburg: SmartPLS, http://www.smartpls.de

  • Robinson RBJ, Pearce JAI (1988) Planned patterns of strategic behavior and their relationship to business-unit performance. Strateg Manag J 9:43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Said E (2006) Strategic decision-making: process perspectives. Int J Manag Rev 8(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwenk CR (1998) Diversity, eccentricity and devil’s advocacy. In: Papadakis V, Barwise P (eds) Strategic decisions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, pp 85–94 (Reprinted from Jan 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott WR, Christensen S (1995) The institutional construction of otganizations: international and logitudinal studies. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Slappendel C (1996) Perspectives on innovation in organizations. Organ Stud 17(1):107–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares-Aguiar A, Palma-Dos-Reis A (2008) Why do firms adopt e-procurements systems? Using logistic regression to empirically test a conceptual model. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 55(1):120–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone M (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictors. J R Stat Soc 36(2):111–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiago O, Martins MF (2011) Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electron J Inf Syst Eval 14(1):110–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomatzky L, Fleischer M (1990) The process of technology innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback JM (1982) Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology. In: Tushman ML, Moore WL (eds) Readings in the management of innovation. Pitman, Boston, pp 29–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci 39(2):273–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 45(2):186–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macau SAR, China

    Vincent Ting Pong Cheng

  2. University of Sydney Business School, ITLS, level 13, Rm 1336, St. James campus, 173-175 Phillip St., Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia

    Peter Lok

Authors
  1. Vincent Ting Pong Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Lok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Ting Pong Cheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, V.T.P., Lok, P. Strategic decision-making criteria and process of top management on technology adoption in the travel agency industry. Inf Technol Tourism 15, 189–208 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-015-0028-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-015-0028-x

Keywords