Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Evidential Supplier Selection Based on DEMATEL and Game Theory

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The supplier selection plays an important role in supplier chain management. How to evaluate the performance of suppliers is still an open issue. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), due to its ability of solving multi-source information problem, has become a quite effective tool. Currently, the analytic network process (ANP) and Entropy weight are employed to solved MCDM problems. However, these techniques ignore the one-sidedness of the single weighting method and cannot deal with the uncertainties of input data. In this paper, a new evidential ANP methodology based on game theory is proposed to efficiently address supplier management under uncertain environment. First, ANP and entropy weight are employed to obtain the subjective and objective weights of criteria. Second, based on decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and game theory, the comprehensive weight of ANP and entropy weight can be determined. Game theory is employed to combine the merits of subjective weight and objective weight, and DEMATEL is adopted to adjust the weight of criteria to make the result more reasonable. Finally, evidence theory is adopted to deal with the uncertainties of input data and get the supplier selection result. A case study is given to demonstrate the proposed modeling process. By comparing with the existing methods, we demonstrate that the proposed model has many advantages and it shows the efficiency and rationality in supplier selection problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Alsyouf, I., Al-Araidah, O., Tates, M., Ciganovic, R.: A multi-criteria decision-making framework for assessing the quality and cost of facility layout alternatives: a case study. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 226(2), 353–364 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Peng, J.P., Yeh, W.C., Lai, T.C., Hsu, C.P.: Similarity-based method for multiresponse optimization problems with intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 227(6), 908–916 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kisly, D., Tereso, A., Carvalho, M.S.: Implementation of multiple criteria decision analysis approaches in the supplier selection process: A case study. New advances in information systems and technologies, pp. 951–960. Springer, Berlin (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chan, F.T.S., Kumar, N.: Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended ahp-based approach. Omega 35(4), 417431 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, H., Deng, Y., Chan, F.T.S., Zhang, X.: A modified multi-criterion optimization genetic algorithm for order distribution in collaborative supply chain. Appl. Math. Model. 37(14–15), 7855–7864 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hosseini, S., Khaled, A.A.: A hybrid ensemble and ahp approach for resilient supplier selection. J. Intell. Manuf. 1–22 (2016). doi:10.1007/s10845-016-1241-y

  7. Zhou, X., Deng, X., Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S.: Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis based on d numbers and ahp. Nucl. Eng. Des. 313, 243–252 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, C.C., Shih, H.S., Shyur, H.J., Wu, K.S.: A business strategy selection of green supply chain management via an analytic network process. Comput. Math. Appl. 64(8), 2544–2557 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ayaǧ, Z, Samanlioglu, F.: An intelligent approach to supplier evaluation in automotive sector. J. Intell. Manuf. 27(4), 889–903 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saaty, T.L.: The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: the ahp/anp approach. Oper. Res. 61(5), 1101–1118 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, Q., Li, M., Deng, Y.: Measure the structure similarity of nodes in complex networks based on relative entropy. Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. (2017). doi:10.1016/j.physa.2017.09.042

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chakroborty, S., Chakladar, N.D.: A combined topsis-ahp method based approach for non-traditional machining process selection. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 222(12), 1613–1623 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shidpour, H., Shahrokhi, M., Bernard, A.: A multi-objective programming approach, integrated into the topsis method, in order to optimize product design; in three-dimensional concurrent engineering. Comput. Ind. Eng. 64(4), 875–885 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong, Y., Wang, J., Chen, F., Hu, Y., Deng, Y.: Location of facility based on simulated annealing and zkw algorithms. Math. Prob. Eng. 2017 (2017) Article ID 4628501. doi:10.1155/2017/4628501

  15. Chan, F., Han, C., Damrongwongsiri, M.: Stochastic modeling of a twoechelon multiple sourcing supply chain system with genetic algorithm. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 16(1), 87–108 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Niu, B., Chan, F.T.S., Xie, T., Liu, Y.: Guided chemotaxis-based bacterial colony algorithm for three-echelon supply chain optimisation. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 30, 1–15 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, X., Chan, F.T.S., Adamatzky, A., Mahadevan, S., Yang, H., Zhang, Z., Deng, Y.: An intelligent physarum solver for supply chain network design under profit maximization and oligopolistic competition. Int. J. Prod. Res. 55(1): 244–263 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, J., Zhang, Z.M., Tian, X.T., Geng, J.H., Liu, S.N.: An approach to partner selection in virtual enterprises based on grey relational analysis. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 225(12), 2296–2301 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saaty, T.L.: What is the analytic hierarchy process?. Mathematical models for decision support, pp. 109–121. Springer, Berlin (1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Saaty, T.L.: How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48(1), 9–26 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Saaty, T.L.: The analytic network process. Iran. J. Oper. Res. 1(1), 1–27 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tseng, M.L.: Green supply chain management with linguistic preferences and incomplete information. Appl. Soft Comput. 11(8), 4894–4903 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kang, H.Y., Lee, A.H.I.: Inventory replenishment model using fuzzy multiple objective programming: a case study of a high-tech company in Taiwan. Appl. Soft Comput. 10(4), 1108–1118 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan, F.T.S., Chan, H.K.: Development of the supplier selection modela case study in the advanced technology industry. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 218(12), 1807–1824 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Flynn, B.B., Huo, B., Zhao, X.: The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. J. Oper. Manag. 28(1), 58–71 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar, D., Rahman, Z., Chan, F.T.S.: A fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming model for order allocation in a sustainable supply chain: A case study. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 30(6), 535–551 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Deng, Y., Chan, F.T.S.: A new fuzzy Dempster mcdm method and its application in supplier selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(8), 9854–9861 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Amin, S.H., Razmi, J., Zhang, G.: Supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy SWOT analysis and fuzzy linear programming. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(1), 334–342 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, S., Deng, Y., Wu, J.: Fuzzy sensor fusion based on evidence theory and its application. Appl. Artif. Intell. 27(3), 235–248 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zheng, H., Deng, Y., Hu, Y.: Fuzzy evidential influence diagram and its evaluation algorithm. Knowl.-Based Syst. 131, 28–45 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahmadi, H.B., Petrudi, S.H.H., Wang, X.: Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with analytical hierarchy process and improved grey relational analysis: a case of telecom industry. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 90, 1–15 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pitchipoo, P., Venkumar, P., Rajakarunakaran, S.: Grey decision model for supplier evaluation and selection in process industry: a comparative perspective. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 76(9), 2059–2069 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang, C., Chen, B.: Supplier selection using combined analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 17(7), 926–941 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38(2), 325–339 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Mo, H., Deng, Y.: A new aggregating operator in linguistic decision making based on d numbers. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 24(6), 831–846 (2016)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Kang, B., Chhipi-Shrestha, G., Deng, Y., Mori, J., Hewage, K., Sadiq, R.: Development of a predictive model for clostridium difficile infection incidence in hospitals using Gaussian mixture model and Dempster–Shafer theroy. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. (2017) accepted. doi:10.1007/s00477-017-1459-z

  38. Zhang, X., Deng, Y., Chan, F.T.S., Adamatzky, A., Mahadevan, S.: Supplier selection based on evidence theory and analytic network process. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 230(3), 562–573 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sun, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, B., Shang, Y., Yuan, H., Ma, Z.: An integrated decision-making model for transformer condition assessment using game theory and modified evidence combination extended by d numbers. Energies 9(9), 697 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sanfey, A.G.: Social decision-making: insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science 318(5850), 598–602 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Frank, D.M., Sarkar, S.: Group decisions in biodiversity conservation: implications from game theory. Plos One 5(5), e10688 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lai, C., Chen, X., Chen, X., Wang, Z., Wu, X., Zhao, S.: A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for flood risk based on the combination weight of game theory. Nat. Hazards 77(2), 1243–1259 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., et al.: A DEMATEL-based completion method for incomplete pairwise comparison matrix in AHP. Ann. Oper. Res. arXiv:1607.08116

  44. Zhou, X., Shi, Y., Deng, X., Deng, Y.: D-dematel: a new method to identify critical success factors in emergency management. Saf. Sci. 91, 93–104 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shyur, H.J.: Cots evaluation using modified topsis and anp. Appl. Math. Comput. 177(1), 251–259 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Q. Rev. Biol. 27 26(3) 379–423 (1951)

  47. Li, L., Mo, R.: Production task queue optimization based on multi-attribute evaluation for complex product assembly workshop. Plos One 10(9), e0134343 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhao, H., Li, N.: Optimal siting of charging stations for electric vehicles based on fuzzy Delphi and hybrid multi-criteria decision making approaches from an extended sustainability perspective. Energies 9(4), 270 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Gabus, A., Fontela, E.: World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tzeng, G.H., Chiang, C.H., Li, C.W.: Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid mcdm model based on factor analysis and dematel. Expert Syst. Appl. Int. J. 32(4), 1028–1044 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhan, Y., Liu, J., Ma, X.: The Evaluation on the Suppliers of Prefabricated Housing Components Based on DEMATEL Method. Springer, Singapore (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  52. Nash, J.F.: Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 36(1), 48 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Nash, J.: Non-cooperative games. Ann. Math. 54(2), 286–295 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu, H .C.: FMEA Using Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning and GRA Method. Springer, Singapore (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  55. Liao, R., Zheng, H., Grzybowski, S., Yang, L.: An integrated decision-making model for condition assessment of power transformers using fuzzy approach and evidential reasoning. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 26(2), 1111–1118 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Anderson, D.R., Sweeney, D.J., Williams, T.A., et al.: An introduction to management science: quantitative approaches to decision making. South-Western College Pub., Cincinnati (2015)

  57. Beynon, M.: Ds/ahp method: a mathematical analysis, including an understanding of uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 140(1), 148–164 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Vinodh, S., Gautham, S., Ramiya, R.A., Rajanayagam, D.: Application of fuzzy analytic network process for agile concept selection in a manufacturing organisation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 38(24), 272–280 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61573290, 61503237).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Science, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China

    Tianyu Liu & Yong Deng

  2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710049, China

    Tianyu Liu

  3. Institute of Integrated Automation, School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710049, Shaanxi, China

    Yong Deng

  4. Big Data Decision Institute, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, Guangdong, China

    Yong Deng

  5. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    Felix Chan

Authors
  1. Tianyu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yong Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felix Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Deng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, T., Deng, Y. & Chan, F. Evidential Supplier Selection Based on DEMATEL and Game Theory. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20, 1321–1333 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0400-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0400-4

Keywords