Skip to main content
Log in

An Approach to Consensus Measure Based on Possibility Degrees of PLTSs in Group Decision Making

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most desired alternative in group decision making (GDM) is the one that best reflects the consensus of the group. However, few studies have been conducted on consensus measure in GDM with probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs). In this study, we propose an approach to consensus measure on the basis of the possibility degree of PLTSs in GDM. Firstly, we define the concept of degree of similarity between two PLTSs on the basis of possibility degrees. Then, we extend this concept to the consensus measure between the probabilistic linguistic information provided by group decision makers, and the relevant weight of each group decision maker is derived. Thereafter, we aggregate the PLTSs provided by each group decision maker and the alternatives are then ranked. Finally, two illustrative examples are proposed for the application of our method to evaluate the degree of consensus of collective preference values between experts and large group decision making problems with PLTSs. By comparison analysis, the advantages of the proposed method are verified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen, S.M., Lee, L.W., Yang, S.W., Sheu, T.W.: Adaptive consensus support model for group decision making systems. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(16), 12580–12588 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, J., Wang, J.Q., Zhang, H.Y., Chen, X.H.: Multi-criteria group decision making approach based on 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators with multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18(1), 81–97 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: extensions, applications and challenges. Inf. Sci. 207(1), 1–18 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, W.S., Liao, H.C.: A bibliometric analysis of fuzzy decision research during 1970-2015. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19(1), 1–14 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, S.H., Chen, S.M., Huang, Z.C.: Autocratic decision making using group recommendations based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Information Sciences. s 361–362, 135–161 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morente-Molinera, J.A., Pérez, I.J., Ureña, M.R., Herrera-Viedma, E.: On multi-granular fuzzy linguistic modeling in group decision making problems: a systematic review and future trends. Knowl. Based Syst. 74(1), 49–60 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meng, F.Y.: A hesitant fuzzy linguistic multi-granularity decision making model based on distance measures. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 28(4), 1519–1531 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Yager, R.R.: A new methodology for ordinal multi-objective decisions based on fuzzy sets-readings in fuzzy sets for intelligent systems. Read. Fuzzy Sets Intell. Syst. 12(4), 589–600 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 79(2), 175–190 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodriguez, R.M., Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20(1), 109–119 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gou, X.J., Xu, Z.S., Liao, H.C.: Multiple criteria decision making based on Bonferroni means with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Soft. Comput. 21(21), 6515–6529 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wei, C.P., Zhao, N., Tang, X.J.: Operators and comparisons of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22(3), 575–585 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu, Y.J., Xu, A.W., Merigó, J.M., Wang, H.M.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic ordered weighted distance operators for group decision making. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 49(1), 285–308 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, Y.J., Wang, Y.Z., Wang, J.P.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic multiple attribute decision making. In: International Conference on Information Fusion, pp. 1421–1426 (2013)

  15. Farhadinia, B.: Multiple criteria decision making methods with completely unknown weights in hesitant fuzzy linguistic term setting. Knowl. Based Syst. 93, 135–144 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hesamian, G., Shams, M.: Measuring similarity and ordering based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. IOS Press 28(2), 983–990 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Zeng, X.J.: Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Inf. Sci. 271(3), 125–142 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Zeng, X.J., Merigó, J.M.: Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Knowl. Based Syst. 76, 127–138 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, J.Q., Wu, J.T., Wang, J., Zhang, H.Y., Chen, X.H.: Multi-criteria decision making methods based on the hausdorff distance of hesitant fuzzy linguistic numbers. Soft. Comput. 20(4), 1621–1633 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, H.B., Cai, J.F., Jiang, L.: On improving the additive consistency of the fuzzy preference relations based on comparative linguistic expressions. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 29(6), 544–559 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, Z.M., Wu, C.: On the use of multiplicative consistency in hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Knowl. Based Syst. 72, 13–27 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu, B., Xu, Z.S.: Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22(1), 35–45 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application in decision making: a state-of-the art survey. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0432-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Zeng, X.J.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic VIKOR method and its application in qualitative multiple criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23(5), 1343–1355 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, W.K., Ju, Y.B., Liu, X.Y.: Multiple criteria decision analysis based on Shapley fuzzy measures and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic numbers. Comput. Ind. Eng. 105, 28–38 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pang, Q., Wang, H., Xu, Z.S.: Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Inf. Sci. 369, 128–143 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bai, C.Z., Zhang, R., Qian, L.X., Wu, Y.N.: Comparisons of probabilistic linguistic term sets for multi-criteria decision making. Knowl. Based Syst. 119, 284–291 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gou, X.J., Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Herrera, F.: Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and MULTIMOORA method: A case of study to evaluate the implementation status of haze controlling measures. Inf. Fusion 38, 22–34 (2017)  

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhai, Y.L., Xu, Z.S., Liao, H.C.: Probabilistic linguistic vector-term set and its application in group decision making with multi-granular linguistic information. Appl. Soft Comput. 49, 801–816 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, Y.X., Xu, Z.S., Wang, H., Liao, H.C.: Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation. Appl. Soft Comput. 49, 817–833 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, Y.X., Xu, Z.S., Liao, H.C.: A consensus process for group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations. Inf. Sci. 414, 260–275 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liao, H.C., Jiang, L.S., Xu, Z.S., Xu, J.P., Herrera, F.: A linear programming method for multiple criteria decision making with probabilistic linguistic information. Inf. Sci. 415–416, 341–355 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu, Y., Fan, Z.P., Zhang, X.: A method for large group decision making based on evaluation information provided by participators from multiple groups. Inf. Fusion 29(C), 132–141 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Peng, H.G., Zhang, H.Y., Wang, J.Q.: Cloud decision support model for selecting hotels on TripAdvisor.com with probabilistic linguistic information. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 3(68), 124–138 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yu, S.M., Wang, J., Wang, J.Q., Li, L.: A multi-criteria decision making model for hotel selection with linguistic distribution assessments. Appl. Soft Comput. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Perez, I.J., Cabrerizo, F.J., Alonso, S., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A new consensus model for group decision making problems with non-homogeneous experts. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 44(4), 494–498 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Herrera-Viedma, E., Cabrerizo, F.J., Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W.: A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Inf. Fusion 17(1), 4–13 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Zeng, X.J., Merigó, J.M.: Framework of group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference information. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23(4), 1211–1227 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gong, Z.W., Zhang, H.H., Forrest, J., Li, L.S., Xu, X.X.: Two consensus models based on the minimum cost and maximum return regarding either all individuals or one individual. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240(1), 183–192 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang, Z.M.: Hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making with unknown weight information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19(3), 615–636 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Plastria, F., Blockmans, T.: Multidimensional theoretic consensus reachability: the impact of distance selection and issue saliences. Group Decis. Negot. 24(1), 1–44 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Xia, M.M., Chen, J.: Consistency and consensus improving methods for pairwise comparison matrices based on abelian linearly ordered group. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 266, 1–32 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Sun, B.Z., Ma, W.M.: An approach to consensus measurement of linguistic preference relations in multi-attribute group decision making and application. Omega 51(1), 83–92 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gou, X.J., Xu, Z.S., Liao, H.C.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic entropy and cross-entropy measures and alternative queuing method for multiple criteria decision making. Inf. Sci. 388(5), 225–246 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Nakahara, Y., Sasaki, M., Gen, M.: On the linear programming problems with interval coefficients. Comput. Ind. Eng. 23(1–4), 301–304 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S.: Approaches to manage hesitant fuzzy linguistic information based on the cosine distance and similarity measures for HFLTSs and their application in qualitative decision making. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(12), 5328–5336 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and constructive suggestions that greatly help the improvement of this paper. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71701037, 71701038 and 71601041).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meng Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, M., Gao, Q., Fang, J. et al. An Approach to Consensus Measure Based on Possibility Degrees of PLTSs in Group Decision Making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20, 2257–2272 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0464-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0464-9

Keywords

Navigation