Abstract
The evaluation of green supply chain management (GSCM) practices is a typical multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. Considering widely existed uncertainty, evaluating GSCM practices in a fuzzy environment becomes a fuzzy MCDM issue. Traditional fuzzy MCDM approaches solve the issue usually through fusing the fuzzy assessments on different criteria for each alternative. In the process, the fuzzy uncertainty of every assessment has been given much attention; however, the non-exclusiveness between fuzzy linguistic variables is often ignored especially when combining the fuzzy assessments. In this paper, the non-exclusiveness between fuzzy assessments represented by linguistic variables is fully taken into consideration. A theory called D number theory, as an extension of Dempster–Shafer theory, is used to deal with this non-exclusiveness. Based on D number theory, a novel method is proposed to evaluate GSCM practices in the fuzzy environment. The main contribution and advantage of the proposed method is being able to simultaneously cope with fuzziness, ambiguity, and non-exclusiveness involved in the process of evaluating GSCM practices. A numerical example and related analysis are provided to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.





Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Afzali, A., Rafsanjani, M.K., Saeid, A.B.: A fuzzy multi-objective linear programming model based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for supplier selection. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18(5), 864–874 (2016)
Ahi, P., Searcy, C.: A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 52, 329–341 (2013)
Bai, C., Sarkis, J.: Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory. J. Clean. Prod. 18(12), 1200–1210 (2010)
Chou, C.C.: The canonical representation of multiplication operation on triangular fuzzy numbers. Comput. Math. Appl. 45(10), 1601–1610 (2003)
Cui, H., Liu, Q., Zhang, J., Kang, B.: An improved deng entropy and its application in pattern recognition. IEEE Access 7, 18284–18292 (2019)
Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38(2), 325–339 (1967)
Deng, X.: Analyzing the monotonicity of belief interval based uncertainty measures in belief function theory. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(9), 1869–1879 (2018)
Deng, X., Jiang, W.: Exploring the combination rules of D numbers from a perspective of conflict redistribution. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), Xi’an, China, pp. 542–547, https://doi.org/10.23919/ICIF.2017.8009696 (2017)
Deng, X., Jiang, W.: Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis using an evidential network approach extended by belief rules and uncertainty measures. Ann Nuclear Energy 117, 183–193 (2018a)
Deng, X., Jiang, W.: An evidential axiomatic design approach for decision making using the evaluation of belief structure satisfaction to uncertain target values. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(1), 15–32 (2018b)
Deng, X., Jiang, W.: D number theory based game-theoretic framework in adversarial decision making under a fuzzy environment. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 106, 194–213 (2019)
Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S.: Environmental impact assessment based on D numbers. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(2), 635–643 (2014a)
Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S.: Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(1), 156–167 (2014b)
Deng, X., Han, D., Dezert, J., Deng, Y., Shyr, Y.: Evidence combination from an evolutionary game theory perspective. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 46(9), 2070–2082 (2016)
Deng, X., Xiao, F., Deng, Y.: An improved distance-based total uncertainty measure in belief function theory. Appl. Intell. 46(4), 898–915 (2017)
Deng, X., Jiang, W., Wang, Z.: Zero-sum polymatrix games with link uncertainty: a Dempster–Shafer theory solution. Appl. Math. Comput. 340, 101–112 (2019)
Deng, Y.: D numbers: theory and applications. J. Inf. Comput. Sci. 9(9), 2421–2428 (2012)
Dezert, J., Smarandache, F.: An introduction to DSmT for information fusion. New Math. Nat. Comput. 8(3), 343–359 (2012)
Elmore, P.A., Petry, F.E., Yager, R.R.: Geospatial modeling using Dempster–Shafer theory. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 47(6), 1551–1561 (2017)
Erol, I., Sencer, S., Sari, R.: A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain. Ecol. Econ. 70(6), 1088–1100 (2011)
Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., Davarzani, H.: Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ 162, 101–114 (2015)
Fan, G., Zhong, D., Yan, F., Yue, P.: A hybrid fuzzy evaluation method for curtain grouting efficiency assessment based on an AHP method extended by D numbers. Expert Syst. Appl. 44, 289–303 (2016)
Fei, L., Deng, Y., Hu, Y.: DS-VIKOR: A new multi-criteria decision-making method for supplier selection. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0543-y (2018)
Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., Vafadarnikjoo, A.: Intuitionistic fuzzy based DEMATEL method for developing green practices and performances in a green supply chain. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(20), 7207–7220 (2015a)
Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., Murugesan, P.: Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 98, 66–83 (2015b)
Green Jr., K.W., Zelbst, P.J., Meacham, J., Bhadauria, V.S.: Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 17(3), 290–305 (2012)
Han, D., Dezert, J., Duan, Z.: Evaluation of probability transformations of belief functions for decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 46(1), 93–108 (2016)
Han, Y., Deng, Y.: An enhanced fuzzy evidential DEMATEL method with its application to identify critical success factors. Soft Comput. 22(15), 5073–5090 (2018)
He, Z., Jiang, W.: An evidential dynamical model to predict the interference effect of categorization on decision making. Knowl. Based Syst. 150, 139–149 (2018a)
He, Z., Jiang, W.: An evidential markov decision making model. Inf. Sci. 467, 357–372 (2018b)
He, Z., Jiang, W., Chan, F.T.S.: Evidential supplier selection based on interval data fusion. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20(4), 1159–1171 (2017)
Hervani, A.A., Helms, M.M., Sarkis, J.: Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmark. Int. J. 12(4), 330–353 (2005)
Hsu, C.W., Kuo, T.C., Chen, S.H., Hu, A.H.: Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 56, 164–172 (2013)
Huang, Z., Lin, Yang J.W.: Uncertainty measurement with belief entropy on the interference effect in the quantum-like Bayesian networks. Appl. Math. Comput. 347, 417–428 (2019)
Jiang, W.: A correlation coefficient for belief functions. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 103, 94–106 (2018)
Jiang, W., Hu, W.: An improved soft likelihood function for Dempster–Shafer belief structures. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(6), 1264–1282 (2018)
Jiang, W., Huang, C.: A multi-criteria decision-making model for evaluating suppliers in green SCM. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 13(3), 337–352 (2018)
Jiroušek, R., Shenoy, P.P.: A new definition of entropy of belief functions in the Dempster–Shafer theory. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 92, 49–65 (2018)
Jousselme, A.L., Liu, C., Grenier, D., Bossé, É.: Measuring ambiguity in the evidence theory. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 36(5), 890–903 (2006)
Kahraman, C., Oztaysi, B., Onar, S.C.: A comprehensive literature review of 50 years of fuzzy set theory. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 9, 3–24 (2016)
Khaleghi, Bahador, Khamis, Alaa, Karray, O.F., Razavi, N.S.: Multisensor data fusion: a review of the state-of-the-art. Inf. Fus. 14(1), 28–44 (2013)
Laosirihongthong, T., Adebanjo, D., Choon Tan, K.: Green supply chain management practices and performance. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 113(8), 1088–1109 (2013)
Li, Y., Deng, Y.: Generalized ordered propositions fusion based on belief entropy. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 13(5), 792–807 (2018)
Liang, Y., Liu, J., Qin, J., Tu, Y.: An improved multi-granularity interval 2-tuple TODIM approach and its application to green supplier selection. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0546-8 (2018)
Lin, R.J.: Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. J. Clean. Prod. 40(2), 32–39 (2013)
Lin, S., Li, C., Xu, F., Liu, D., Liu, J.: Risk identification and analysis for new energy power system in china based on D numbers and decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL). J. Clean. Prod. 180, 81–96 (2018)
Liu, H.C., You, J.X., Fan, X.J., Lin, Q.L.: Failure mode and effects analysis using D numbers and grey relational projection method. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(10), 4670–4679 (2014)
Liu, T., Deng, Y., Chan, F.: Evidential supplier selection based on DEMATEL and game theory. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20(4), 1321–1333 (2018)
Luthra, S., Garg, D., Haleem, A.: The impacts of critical success factors for implementing green supply chain management towards sustainability: an empirical investigation of Indian automobile industry. J. Clean. Prod. 121, 142–158 (2016)
Mirhedayatian, S.M., Azadi, M., Saen, R.F.: A novel network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating green supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 147, 544–554 (2014)
Musharraf, M., Hassan, J., Khan, F., Veitch, B., MacKinnon, S., Imtiaz, S.: Human reliability assessment during offshore emergency conditions. Saf. Sci. 59, 19–27 (2013)
Oliveira, U.R.D., Espindola, L.S., Silva, I.R.D., Silva, I.N.D., Rocha, H.M.: A systematic literature review on green supply chain management: research implications and future perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 187, 537–561 (2018)
Pourjavad, E., Shahin, A.: The application of mamdani fuzzy inference system in evaluating green supply chain management performance. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20(3), 901–912 (2018)
Rostamzadeh, R., Govindan, K., Esmaeili, A., Sabaghi, M.: Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices. Ecol. Ind. 49, 188–203 (2015)
Sari, K.: A novel multi-criteria decision framework for evaluating green supply chain management practices. Comput. Ind. Eng. 105, 338–347 (2017)
Sarkis, J.: Green Supply Chain Management. Momentum Press, New York (2013)
Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., Lai, Kh: An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 130(1), 1–15 (2011)
Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)
Shen, L., Olfat, L., Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., Diabat, A.: A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 74, 170–179 (2013)
Smets, P., Kennes, R.: The transferable belief model. Artif. Intell. 66(2), 191–234 (1994)
Song, Y., Wang, X., Wu, W., Quan, W., Huang, W.: Evidence combination based on credibility and non-specificity. Pattern Anal. Appl. 21(1), 167–180 (2018)
Tseng, M.L., Lin, Y.H., Tan, K., Chen, R.H., Chen, Y.H.: Using TODIM to evaluate green supply chain practices under uncertainty. Appl. Math. Model. 38(11–12), 2983–2995 (2014)
Tseng, M.L., Tan, K., Chiu, A.S.: Identifying the competitive determinants of firms’ green supply chain capabilities under uncertainty. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 18(5), 1247–1262 (2016)
Uygun, Ö., Dede, A.: Performance evaluation of green supply chain management using integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making techniques. Comput. Ind. Eng. 102, 502–511 (2016)
Wu, K.J., Liao, C.J., Tseng, M.L., Chiu, A.S.: Exploring decisive factors in green supply chain practices under uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 159, 147–157 (2015)
Xiao, F.: A novel multi-criteria decision making method for assessing health-care waste treatment technologies based on D numbers. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 71, 216–225 (2018)
Xiao, F.: Multi-sensor data fusion based on the belief divergence measure of evidences and the belief entropy. Inf. Fus. 46, 23–32 (2019)
Xu, H., Deng, Y.: Dependent evidence combination based on shearman coefficient and pearson coefficient. IEEE Access 6(1), 11634–11640 (2018)
Xu, X., Zheng, J., Yang, J.B., Xu, D.L., Chen, Y.W.: Data classification using evidence reasoning rule. Knowl. Based Syst. 116, 144–151 (2017)
Yager, R.R.: A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval. Inf. Sci. 24(2), 143–161 (1981)
Yager, R.R.: Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 25(5), 1222–1230 (2017)
Yager, R.R., Alajlan, N.: Decision making with ordinal payoffs under Dempster–Shafer type uncertainty. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 28(11), 1039–1053 (2013)
Yager, R.R., Alajlan, N.: Dempster–Shafer belief structures for decision making under uncertainty. Knowl. Based Syst. 80, 58–66 (2015)
Yager, R.R., Zadeh, L.A.: An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic Applications in Intelligent Systems, vol. 165. Springer, Berlin (2012)
Yager, R.R., Elmore, P., Petry, F.: Soft likelihood functions in combining evidence. Inf. Fus. 36, 185–190 (2017)
Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)
Zhou, X., Deng, X., Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S.: Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis based on D numbers and AHP. Nucl. Eng. Des. 313, 243–252 (2017)
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Lai, Kh: Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 111(2), 261–273 (2008)
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Lai, Kh: Examining the effects of green supply chain management practices and their mediations on performance improvements. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50(5), 1377–1394 (2012)
Acknowledgements
The work is partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Program Nos. 61703338, 61671384), Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Program No. 2018JQ6085).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deng, X., Jiang, W. Evaluating Green Supply Chain Management Practices Under Fuzzy Environment: A Novel Method Based on D Number Theory. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21, 1389–1402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00639-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00639-5