Abstract
In the design phase of a new smart product, production costs are unpredictable due to location, transport, and engineering design. In these situations, consequently, cost optimization becomes ambiguous. This paper presents a methodology to obtain optimization through a fuzzy linear programming problem (FLPP) in which fuzzy numbers signify the right-side parameters. The comparative investigation of modeling and optimizing creation cost through a new α-cut based quadrilateral fuzzy number is proposed to solve the fuzzy linear programming and the necessary operations on the proposed number. Due to the probabilistic increase and decrease in the accessibility of the various constraints, the actual expected total cost fluctuates. In this respect, a unique situation of instability is incorporated, and reasonable models to reduce the cost of eradication in the creation process are presented. The main endeavor is made to look at the credibility of optimized cost utilizing the α-cut based quadrilateral FLPP models, and the outcome is contrasted with its augmentation. The data of the production cost of RCF Kapurthala is taken, and the creation expenses of various mentors from the year 2010–2011 are considered as input parameters. The aggregate cost is focused on the objective function. The least low, lower, upper, and most upper bounds are computed for each situation, and then systems of optimized fuzzy LPP are constructed. The credibility of quadrilateral fuzzy LPP concerning all situations is obtained and using this membership grade, the minimum, and highest minimum costs are illustrated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shanmuganayagam, V.: Current float techniques for resources scheduling. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 115, 401–411 (1989)
Adeli, H., Karim, A.: Scheduling/cost optimization and neural dynamics model for construction. Engineering 123(December), 450–458 (1997)
Zhang, M., Zhang, W., Sicotte, H., Yang, P.: A new validity measure for a correlation-based fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Conference IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Engineering the Future of Biomedicine EMBC 2009, pp. 3865–3868 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/iembs.2009.5332582
Liu, W.Y., Chen, Z.W., Bai, P., Fang, S.F., Shi, V.: A kind of improved method of fuzzy clustering. 2005 Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. Cybern. ICMLC 2005(August), 2646–2649 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/icmlc.2005.1527391
Abdelkhalek, H.A., Refaie, H.S., Aziz, R.F.: Optimization of time and cost through learning curve analysis. Ain Shams Eng. J. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.12.007
Batra, R.N., Uiah, A.: Competitive firm and the theory of input demand under price uncertainty author (s): Raveendra N. Batra and Aman Ullah Source: Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, No. 3 (May–Jun., 1974), pp. 537–548 Published by: The University of Chicago, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 537–548 (2016)
Greene, W.H.: The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Change (2008)
Tabrizi, B.H., Razmi, J.: Introducing a mixed-integer non-linear fuzzy model for risk management in designing supply chain networks. J. Manuf. Syst. 32(2), 295–307 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.12.001
Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control (1965). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Faizi, S., Sałabun, W., Rashid, T., Watróbski, J., Zafar, S.: Group decision-making for hesitant fuzzy sets based on Characteristic Objects Method. Symmetry (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9080136
Chen, J., Huang, X.: Dual hesitant fuzzy probability. Symmetry (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9040052
Hou, S., Wang, H., Feng, S.: Attribute control chart construction based on fuzzy score number. Symmetry (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym8120139
Sałabun, W., Piegat, A.: Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Artif. Intell. Rev. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-016-9511-9
Bucolo, M., Fortuna, L., La Rosa, M.: Complex dynamics through fuzzy chains. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2004.825969
Piegat, A.: A new definition of the fuzzy set. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 15(1), 125–140 (2005)
Stefanini, L., Sorini, L., Guerra, M.L.: Fuzzy numbers and fuzzy arithmetic. In: Handbook of Granular Computing (2008)
Taleshian, A., Rezvani, S.: Multiplication operation on trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. J. Phys. Sci. (2011)
Banerjee, S., Roy, T.K.: Arithmetic operations on generalized trapezoidal fuzzy number and its applications. TJFS 31, 16–44 (2012)
Garg, H., Ansha, : Arithmetic operations on generalized parabolic fuzzy numbers and its application. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. A Phys. Sci. 88(1), 15–26 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-016-0278-9
Klir, G.J.: Fuzzy arithmetic with requisite constraints. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 91(2), 165–175 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00138-3
Hall, R.I., Eilon, S.: Controlling production processes which are subject to linear trends. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 14(3), 279–289 (1963). https://doi.org/10.2307/3007391
Mokhtari, H., Hasani, A.: A multi-objective model for cleaner production-transportation planning in manufacturing plants via fuzzy goal programming. J. Manuf. Syst. 44, 230–242 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.06.002
Gibra, I.N.: Optimal production runs of processes subject to systematic trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. (1974). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207547408919571
Wang, E., Su, T., Chang, M.: Comparative study of the applicability of fuzzy multi-objective linear programming models through cost-effective analysis for mold manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 32(1), 206–219 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.10.003
Kazaz, B., Sloan, T.W.: The impact of process deterioration on production and maintenance policies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.052
Chen, C.H., Huang, K.W.: The determination of optimum process mean for a one-sided specification limit product with manufacturing cost and linear quality loss. J. Qual. 18(1), 19–33 (2011)
Su, T.S., Lin, Y.F.: Fuzzy multi-objective procurement/production planning decision problems for recoverable manufacturing systems. J. Manuf. Syst. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.07.007
Kapur, K.C., Wang, C.J.: Economic design of specifications based on taguchi’s concept of quality loss function. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Production Engineering Division (Publication) PED (1987)
Wen, D., Mergen, A.E.: Running a process with poor capability. Qual. Eng. (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/08982119908919270
Chen, C.H., Chou, C.Y., Huang, K.W.: Determining the optimum process mean under quality loss function. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700200196
Atalay, K.D., Eraslan, E., Çinar, M.O.: A hybrid algorithm based on fuzzy linear regression analysis by quadratic programming for time estimation: an experimental study in manufacturing industry. J. Manuf. Syst. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.06.005
McNally, R.C., Cavusgil, E., Calantone, R.J.: Product innovativeness dimensions and their relationships with product advantage, product financial performance, and project protocol. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00766.x
Shi, L., Ólafsson, S., Chen, Q.: An optimization framework for product design. Manag. Sci. (2001). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.12.1681.10243
Jafari, H., Bateni, S., Daneshvar, P., et al.: Fuzzy mathematical modeling approach for the nurse scheduling problem: a case study. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18, 320–332 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-015-0051-2
Zhang, M., Tseng, M.M.: A product and process modeling based approach to study cost implications of product variety in mass customization. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.889072
Zengin, Y., Ada, E.: Cost management through product design: target costing approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903130876
Al Haj, R.A., El-Sayegh, S.M.: Time-cost optimization model considering float-consumption impact. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 141(5), 1–10 (2015)
Abdulbaki, D., Al-Hindi, M., Yassine, A., Abou Najm, M.: An optimization model for the allocation of water resources. J. Clean. Prod. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.024
Hong, J., Diabat, A., Panicker, V.V., Rajagopalan, S.: A two-stage supply chain problem with fixed costs: an ant colony optimization approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.019
Wang, G., Peng, J.: Fuzzy optimal solution of fuzzy number linear programming problems. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21, 865–881 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0594-0
Shaheen, A.A., Fayek, A.R., Abourizk, S.M.: Fuzzy numbers in cost range estimating. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 133, 325–334 (2007)
Sadeghi Sarcheshmah, M., Seifi, A.R.: Triangular and trapezoidal fuzzy state estimation with uncertainty on measurements. Adv. Electr. Electron. Eng. (2012). https://doi.org/10.15598/aeee.v10i3.686
Jagadeeswari, M., Lakshmana Gomathi Nayagam, V.: Approximation of parabolic fuzzy numbers. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. (2017). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-828-0-107
Grzegorzewski, P., Mrówka, E.: Trapezoidal approximations of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2004.02.015
Chen, C.T., Cheng, H.L.: A comprehensive model for selecting information system project under fuzzy environment. Int. J. Proj. Manag. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.04.001
Veeramani, C., Sumathi, M.: Fuzzy mathematical programming approach for solving fuzzy linear fractional programming problem. RAIRO Oper. Res. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2013056
Ebrahimnejad, A., Tavana, M.: A novel method for solving linear programming problems with symmetric trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Appl. Math. Model. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.02.024
Reza, D., Davood, J.: FFLP problem with symmetric trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Decis. Sci. Lett. 4(2), 117–124 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2015.1.004
Bertone, A.M.A., Jafelice, R.S.D.M., da Câmara, M.A.: Fuzzy linear programming: optimization of an electric circuit model. TEMA 1, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5540/tema.2017.018.03.419
Ying Dong, J., Wan, S.P.: A new trapezoidal fuzzy linear programming method considering the acceptance degree of fuzzy constraints violated. Knowl. Based Syst. 148, 100–114 (2018)
Karimi, H., Sadeghi-Dastaki, M., Javan, M.: A fully fuzzy best–worst multi attribute decision making method with triangular fuzzy number: a case study of maintenance assessment in the hospitals. Appl. Soft Comput. J. 86, 105882 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105882
Bolos, M.I., Bradea, I.A., Delcea, C.: Linear programming and fuzzy optimization to substantiate investment decisions in tangible assets. Entropy (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/e22010121
de Andrés-Sánchez, J.: Pricing European options with triangular fuzzy parameters: assessing alternative triangular approximations in the spanish stock option market. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20, 1624–1643 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0468-5
Wei, G.: Approaches to interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 17, 484–489 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-015-0060-1
Kaur, A., Kumar, A., Appadoo, S.S.: A note on “Approaches to interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information”. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21, 1010–1011 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815018-0581-5
Bohlender, G., Kaufmann, A., Gupta, M.M.: Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic, theory and applications. Math. Comput. 47(176), 762 (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/2008199
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Let \(\tilde{B}_{i}^{p}\) and \(\tilde{B}_{i}^{q}\) be quadrilateral fuzzy numbers with different confidence levels such that \(\beta^{p} \le \beta^{q}\). Take \(\beta^{s} \in [\beta^{p} ,\beta^{q} ]\) , i.e., \(\beta^{s} = \beta^{p}\) then \(\alpha^{s}\)-cut of \(\tilde{B}_{i}^{p}\) and \(\tilde{B}_{i}^{q}\) are
When \(\alpha^{p} \le \beta^{p} ,\alpha^{p} , \beta^{p} \ne 0\)
\(\tilde{B}_{i}^{p} = \left[ {\beta_{i}^{p} - \varepsilon_{i}^{p} , \beta_{i}^{p} - \varepsilon_{i}^{p} + \frac{{\alpha^{p} \varepsilon_{i}^{p} }}{{\beta^{p} }}} \right) \cup \left[ {\beta_{i}^{p} , \beta_{i}^{p} + \frac{{\overline{{\alpha^{p} }} - \beta^{p} }}{{\overline{{\beta^{p} }} }}\left( {\beta_{i}^{p*} - \beta_{i}^{p} } \right)} \right) \cup \left[ {\beta_{i}^{p*} , \alpha^{p} \varepsilon_{i}^{p*} + \left( {\beta_{i}^{p*} - \beta_{i}^{p} } \right)} \right]\) \(\tilde{B}_{i}^{q} = \left[ {\beta_{i}^{q} - \varepsilon_{i}^{q} , \beta_{i}^{q} - \varepsilon_{i}^{q} + \frac{{\alpha^{q} \varepsilon_{i}^{q} }}{{\beta^{q} }}} \right) \cup \left[ {\beta_{i}^{q} , \beta_{i}^{q} + \frac{{\overline{{\alpha^{q} }} - \beta^{q} }}{{\overline{{\beta^{q} }} }}\left( {\beta_{i}^{q*} - \beta_{i}^{q} } \right)} \right) \cup \left[ {\beta_{i}^{q*} , \alpha^{q} \varepsilon_{i}^{q*} + \left( {\beta_{i}^{q*} - \beta_{i}^{q} } \right)} \right]\)
Let \(\tilde{B}_{i}^{s} = \tilde{B}_{i}^{p} + \tilde{B}_{i}^{q + } = \{ y{\mid }y \in \tilde{B}_{\alpha }^{s} \} \,\forall \alpha^{s} \in \left[ {0,1} \right]\). Here \(\tilde{B}_{\alpha }^{s} = \left[ {\tilde{B}_{\alpha }^{sL} \left( {\alpha^{s} } \right), \tilde{B}_{\alpha }^{sU} \left( {\alpha^{s} } \right)} \right]\) be its \(\alpha^{s}\)-cuts such that \(\tilde{B}_{\alpha }^{sL} \left( {\alpha^{s} } \right) = \tilde{B}_{i}^{pL} (\alpha^{p} ) + \tilde{B}_{i}^{qL} (\alpha^{q} )\,{\text{and}}\,\tilde{B}_{\alpha }^{sU} \left( {\alpha^{s} } \right) = \tilde{B}_{i}^{pU} (\alpha^{p} ) + \tilde{B}_{i}^{qU} (\alpha^{q} )\,\,{\text{i}}.{\text{e}}.\)
Now
Now
Appendix 2
Proof As the quadrilateral membership functions of \(\tilde{B}_{i}^{p}\) and \(\tilde{B}_{i}^{q}\) are given in Eqs. (17) and (18), respectively. Thus, in order to find the membership of \(\tilde{B}_{i}^{s}\) = \(\tilde{B}_{i}^{p} \times \tilde{B}_{i}^{q}\) = (\(\beta_{i}^{s} - \varepsilon_{i}^{s}\), \(\beta_{i}^{s} , \beta_{i}^{s*}\), \(\beta_{i}^{s*} + \varepsilon_{i}^{s*}\))
Let \(\tilde{B}_{i}^{s} = \tilde{B}_{i}^{p} \times \tilde{B}_{i}^{q + } = \left\{ {y{\mid }y \in \tilde{B}_{\alpha }^{s} } \right\}\,\forall \alpha^{s} \in \left[ {0,1} \right]\). Here \(\tilde{B}_{\alpha }^{s} = \left[ {\tilde{B}_{\alpha }^{sL} \left( {\alpha^{s} } \right), \,\tilde{B}_{\alpha }^{sU} \left( {\alpha^{s} } \right)} \right]\) be its \(\alpha^{s}\)-cuts such that \(\tilde{B}_{\alpha }^{sL} \left( {\alpha^{s} } \right) = \tilde{B}_{i}^{pL} (\alpha^{p} ) \times \tilde{B}_{i}^{qL} (\alpha^{q} )\,{\text{and}}\,\tilde{B}_{\alpha }^{sU} \left( {\alpha^{s} } \right) = \tilde{B}_{i}^{pU} (\alpha^{p} ) \times \tilde{B}_{i}^{qU} (\alpha^{q} )\,\,{\text{i}} . {\text{e}}\)
Now,
\({\text{Take}}\,M_{2} = \frac{{\varepsilon_{i}^{p} \left( {\varepsilon_{i}^{q + } - \varepsilon_{i}^{q} } \right)}}{{\overline{{\beta^{s} }} \overline{{\beta^{q} }} }},\,\,K_{2} = \frac{{(\beta_{i}^{p} - \varepsilon_{i}^{p} )\left( {\varepsilon_{i}^{q + } - \varepsilon_{i}^{q} } \right)}}{{\overline{{\beta^{q} }} }} + \frac{{(\beta_{i}^{q} - \varepsilon_{i}^{q} )\varepsilon_{i}^{p} }}{{\overline{{\beta^{s} }} }},\,\,{\text{and}}\,N_{2} = (\beta_{i}^{p} - \varepsilon_{i}^{p} )(\beta_{i}^{q} - \varepsilon_{i}^{q} )\,\left( {\alpha^{s} } \right)^{2} {{ M}}_{2} + \,\alpha^{s} {{ K}}_{2} + \,{{ N}}_{2} - y = 0.\)
Similarly, \(In \, I_{2}^{s} = \left[ {\beta_{i}^{p} \beta_{i}^{q} ,\left\{ {\beta_{i}^{p} + \frac{{\overline{{\alpha^{p} }} - \beta^{p} }}{{\overline{{\beta^{p} }} }}\left( {\beta_{i}^{p*} - \beta_{i}^{p} } \right)} \right\} \left\{ { \beta_{i}^{q} + \frac{{\overline{{\alpha^{q} }} - \beta^{q} }}{{\overline{{\beta^{q} }} }}\left( {\beta_{i}^{q*} - \beta_{i}^{q} } \right)} \right\}} \right]\)
And \(I_{3}^{s} = \left[ {\beta_{i}^{p*} \beta_{i}^{q*} ,\left\{ {\left( {\beta_{i}^{p*} + \varepsilon_{i}^{p*} } \right) - \alpha^{p} \varepsilon_{i}^{p*} } \right\}\left\{ {\left( {\beta_{i}^{q*} + \varepsilon_{i}^{q*} } \right) - \alpha^{q} \varepsilon_{i}^{q*} } \right\}} \right]\)
Appendix 3
3.1 Objective Function
Let \(y_{1} , y_{2} , \ldots ,y_{20}\) be variables for different constraints.
Minimize Z = 66.4y1 + 61.58y2 + 64.47y3 + 264.12y4 + 69.17y5 + 130.48y6 + 46.03y7 + 164.11y8 + 262.29y9 + 129.41y10 + 52.16y11 + 202.79y12 + 206.74y13 + 142.17y14 + 236.53y15 + 302.08y16 + 234.01y17 + 236.54y18 + 98.67y19 +119.13y20.
Subjected to constraints:
4.38y1 + 4.07y2 + 4.04y3 + 9.88y4 + 4.10y5 + 7.38y6 + 2.5y7 + 8.11y8 + 14.81y9 + 7.22y10 + 3.05y11 + 9.18y12 + 10.70y13 + 6.38y14 + 10.38y15 + 10.51y16 + 11.24y17 + 11.57y18 + 5.91y19 + 7.79y20 ≥ Blab.
45.7y1 + 41.99y2 +44.49y3 +211.93y4 + 49.13y5 +94.06y6 +33.62y7 +124.32y8 +190.08y9 +93.76y10 +37.29y11 +156.57y12 +153.98y13 +110.86y14 +184.34y15 +246.6y16 +178.25y17 +179.28y18 + 70.13y19 + 81.84y20 ≥ Bmat.
7.33y1 + 6.81y2 + 6.77y3 + 16.55y4 + 6.87y5 + 12.36y6 + 4.58y7 + 14.35y8 + 24.4y9 + 13.17y10 + 5.55y11 + 15.27y12 + 17.84y13 + 10.59y14 + 16.98y15 + 17.19y16 + .18.42y17 + 18.97y18 + 9.70y19 + 12.86y20 ≥ Bfoh.
5.8y1 + 5.39y2 +5.35y3 +13.09y4 +5.43y5 + 9.78y6 +2.91y7 +9.14y8 + 19.3y9 + 8.39y10 +3.54y11 + 12.08y12 + 14.11y13 + 8.38y14 + 13.43y15 + 13.59y16 + 14.57y17 + 15.01y18 + 7.67y19 + 10.17y20 ≥ \(B_{\text{aoh}}\).
1.17y1 + 1.09y2 + 1.08y3 + 2.65y4 + 1.10y5 + 1.98y6 + 0.75y7 + 2.35y8 + 3.91y9 + 2.16y10 + 0.91y11 + 2.45y12 + 2.86y13 + 1.70y14 + 2.72y15 + 2.75y16 + 2.95y17 + 3.04y18 + 1.55y19 + 2.06y20 ≥ Btooh.
0.37y1 +0.34y2 +0.36y3 +1.74y4 +0.40y5 +0.77y6 +0.23y7 +0.85y8 +1.56y9 +0.64y10 +0.25y11 + 1.28y12 + 1.26y13 + 0.91y14 + 1.51y15 + 2.02y16 + 1.46y17 + 1.47y18 + 0.58y19 + 0.67y20 ≥ Bsoh.
14.69y1 + 13.63y2 + 13.57y3 + 34.04y4 + 13.80y5 + 24.89y6 + 8.47y7 + 26.68y8 + 49.16y9 + 24.35y10 + 10.26y11 + 31.09y12 + 36.07y13 + 21.58y14 + 34.64y15 + 35.56y16 + 37.39y17 + 38.49y18 + 19.49y19 + 25.76y20 ≥ Btoh.
1.63y1 + 1.89y2 + 2.37y3 + 8.27y4 + 2.13y5 + 4.14y6 + 1.44y7 + 5y8 + 8.23y9 + 4.07y10 + 1.57y11 + 5.96y12 + 5.99y13 + 3.35y14 + 7.17y15 +9.42y16 + 7.12y17 + 7.20y18 + 3.14y19 + 3.74 ≤ Bproof.
For all \(y_{i}\) ≥ 0.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, R., Chandrawat, R.K., Sarkar, B. et al. An Advanced Optimization Technique for Smart Production Using α-Cut Based Quadrilateral Fuzzy Number. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 23, 107–127 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-01002-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-01002-9