Abstract
This paper focuses on improving the accuracy of seepage models for shale gas reservoirs on the basis of the fuzzy set theory. First, the fuzzy numbers are used to describe the permeability, formation thickness, initial reservoir pressure, gas viscosity, limiting adsorbed mount, and compression factor of shale gas reservoirs. Second, based on the conventional seepage model, single fuzzy parameter seepage models and the multiple fuzzy parameter seepage model for shale gas reservoirs are set up in turn. Solutions to the fuzzy seepage model are handled by means of the fuzzy structural element method. Finally, with the assistance of the centroid method, we work out a single numerical solution in accordance with the fuzzy solution set. In contrast with the conventional seepage models of shale gas reservoirs, the fuzzy seepage model in this paper makes use of the fuzzy numbers to describe the parameters with uncertainty, which also completely considers the in-homogeneity and complex variability of shale gas reservoirs. A numerical simulation example is presented to show the efficiency and development of the fuzzy seepage model. On the basis of the fuzzy seepage model, the sensitivity analysis of relevant main control parameters is carried out to conduct a further study on relevant seepage laws of shale gas reservoirs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shao, J., Zhang, Z., Yu, Z., Wang, J., Zhao, Y., Yang, Q.: Community detection and link prediction via cluster-driven low-rank matrix completion. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-19, pp. 3382–3388. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 7 (2019)
Yu, Z., Zhang, Z., Chen, H., Shao, J.: Structured subspace embedding on attributed networks. Inf. Sci. 512, 726–740 (2019)
Freeman, C.M., Moridis, G., Ilk, D., Blasingame, T.A.: A numerical study of performance for tight gas and shale gas reservoir systems. J. Petroleum Sci. Eng. 108, 22–39 (2013)
Guo, T., Zhang, S., Zou, Y., Xiao, B.: Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in shale gas reservoir. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 26, 847–856 (2015)
Li, S., Zhang, D., Zheng, P., Gui, Q.: Similar structure of solution for triple media shale gas reservoir. J. Petroleum Sci. Eng. 152, 67–80 (2017)
Shen, Y., Pang, Y., Shen, Z., Tian, Y., Ge, H.: Multiparameter analysis of gas transport phenomena in shale gas reservoirs: apparent permeability characterization. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 2601 (2018)
Javadpour, F., Fisher, D., Unsworth, M.: Nanoscale gas flow in shale gas sediments. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 46(10), 10 (2007)
Freeman, C.M., Moridis, G., Ilk, D., Blasingame, T.A.: A numerical study of performance for tight gas and shale gas reservoir systems. J. Petroleum Sci. Eng. 1(108), 22–39 (2013)
Michel, G.G., Sigal, R.F., Civan, F., Devegowda, D.: Parametric Investigation of Shale Gas Production Considering Nano-Scale Pore Size Distribution, Formation Factor, and Non-Darcy Flow Mechanisms, volume All Days of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 10 (2011)
Deng, J., Zhu, W., Ma, Q.: A new seepage model for shale gas reservoir and productivity analysis of fractured well. Fuel 124, 232–240 (2014)
Yuan, Y., Gholizadeh Doonechaly, N., Rahman, S.: An analytical model of apparent gas permeability for tight porous media. Transp. Porous Media 111(1), 193–214 (2016)
Mehmani, A., Prodanović, M., Javadpour, F.: Multiscale, multiphysics network modeling of shale matrix gas flows. Transp. Porous Media 99(2), 377–390 (2013)
Naraghi, M.E., Javadpour, F.: A stochastic permeability model for the shale-gas systems. Int. J. Coal Geol. 140, 111–124 (2015)
Zhang, H., Shu, L., Liao, S.: Generalized trapezoidal fuzzy soft set and its application in medical diagnosis. J. Appl. Math. 2014(3), 1–12 (2014)
Shuang, W., Lan, S.: Maximum principle for partially-observed optimal control problems of stochastic delay systems. J. Syst. Sci. Complex. 30(2), 1–13 (2017)
Nasiri, A., Nguang, S.K., Swain, A., Almakhles, D.J.: Reducing conservatism in \({H}_{\infty }\) robust state feedback control design of T-S fuzzy systems: a non-monotonic approach. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 26(1), 386–390 (2018)
Kochen, M.: Applications of fuzzy sets in psychology. In: Zadeh, L.A., Fu, K.-S., Tanaka, K., Shimura, M. (eds.) Fuzzy Sets and their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes, pp. 395–408. Academic Press, New York (1975)
Balaman, ŞY.: Uncertainty issues in biomass-based production chains. In: Balaman, ŞY. (ed.) Decision-Making for Biomass-Based Production Chains, pp. 113–142. Academic Press, New York (2019)
Li, L.G., Peng, D.H.: Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy hamacher synergetic weighted aggregation operators and their application to shale gas areas selection. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014(9), 27 (2014)
Wu-Guang, L.I., Yang, S.L., Wang, Z.Z., Dong, Q., Wang, H.X.: Shale gas development evaluation model based on the fuzzy optimization analysis. J. China Coal Soc. 38(2), 264–270 (2013)
Fan, G., Zhong, D., Yan, F., Yue, P.: A hybrid fuzzy evaluation method for curtain grouting efficiency assessment based on an AHP method extended by D numbers. Expert Syst. Appl. 44, 289–303 (2016)
Sabzi, H.Z., Humberson, D., Abudu, S., King, J.P.: Optimization of adaptive fuzzy logic controller using novel combined evolutionary algorithms, and its application in Diez Lagos flood controlling system, Southern New Mexico. Expert Syst. Appl. 43, 154–164 (2016)
Zhang, D., Qiu, D., Shu, L.: Fuzzy structure element method for solving fuzzy trilinear seepage model of shale gas reservoir. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21(5), 1597–1612 (2019)
Deng, J., Zhu, W., Qi, Q., Tian, W., Yue, M.: Study on the steady and transient pressure characteristics of shale gas reservoirs. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 24, 210–216 (2015)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11361050 and No.11671284).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Fuzzy Formation Thickness Model
Fuzzy Formation Thickness Model
The derivative of the Eq. (6) about h is
where
The value of Eq. (32) is positive. Therefore, the solution of the fuzzy defined differential equation Eq. (11) is piecewise representation, and the solution is Eq. (12). Let us denote the function as follows:
then
where \(g_2(x)\) is monotonous and bounded in \([-1,1]\), \(f_2(\widetilde{h}) = g_2(E)\). According to the local mapping theorem (see [23]), we obtain
we have
with
Using the centroid method to defuzzify, we get Eq. (13).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, D., Nguang, S.K., Shu, L. et al. Multiple Fuzzy Parameters Nonlinear Seepage model for Shale Gas Reservoirs. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 24, 2845–2857 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-022-01299-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-022-01299-8