Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

VIKOR Method for Plithogenic Probabilistic Linguistic MAGDM and Application to Sustainable Supply Chain Financial Risk Evaluation

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of the increasingly competitive post-epidemic social marketing era, the sustainable development of supply chain finance is also facing the impact of more complex risk factors. However, the issue concerning how to scientifically and reasonably select the appropriate applicant company for financing cooperation on the basis of risk evaluation remains unresolved. For the smooth operation of banks’ sustainable supply chain finance (SSCF) business, this paper aims to develop a novel multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) method considering the robustness and comprehensiveness among risk attributes and decision-makers (DMs). First, based on the idea that quantitative assessment values and qualitative linguistic sets can more accurately express uncertain risk information and importance degree of indicators, a novel concept is proposed that combines the probabilistic linguistic term set (PLTS) with the plithogenic set to evaluate the risk attributes of each alternative. Additionally, risk decision matrices evaluated by DMs are integrated and transformed through the operation of PLTS scoring function aggregation operators and the plithogenic contradiction degree. For deriving the integrated weight information of attributes, the objective attribute weights are determined on the basis of the subjective weights by adjusting coefficients. Then, the ranking order of alternatives is generated by applying the VIKOR method and constructing a MAGDM model with plithogenic PLTSs. Finally, the solving of a practical example concerning the selection of financing objects for SSCF oriented by risk evaluation verifies the effectiveness of the proposed model, where five risk indicators are developed, and the superiority of our studies is demonstrated by comparing with the existing TOPSIS and ELECTRE methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Moretto, A., Caniato, F.: Can Supply Chain Finance help mitigate the financial disruption brought by Covid-19. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 27, 100713 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta, N., Soni, G.: A decision-making framework for sustainable supply chain finance in post-COVID era. Int. J. Glob. Bus. Compet. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-021-00028-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tseng, M.L., Lim, M.K., Wu, K.J.: Improving the benefits and costs on sustainable supply chain finance under uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 218, 308–321 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haimes, Y.Y.: On the complex definition of risk: a systems-based approach. Risk. Anal. 29, 1647–1654 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tseng, M.L., Bui, T.D., Lim, M.K., Tsai, F.M., Tan, R.R.: Comparing world regional sustainable supply chain finance using big data analytics: a bibliometric analysis. Ind. Manag. Data. Syst. 121, 657–770 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Su, Y., Zhao, M., Wei, C., Chen, X.: PT-TODIM method for probabilistic linguistic MAGDM and application to industrial control system security supplier selection. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01125-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yue, Z.: A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS. Appl. Math. Model. 35, 1926–1936 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Wan, S.P., Jin, Z., Dong, J.Y.: Pythagorean fuzzy mathematical programming method for multi-attribute group decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy truth degrees. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 55, 437–466 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zadeh, L.A.: A fuzzy-set-theoretic interpretation of linguistic hedges. J. Cybern. 2, 4–34 (1972)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Turksen, I.B.: Interval valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms. Fuzzy. Set. Syst. 20, 191–210 (1986)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Takeuti, G., Titani, S.: Intuitionistic fuzzy logic and intuitionistic fuzzy set theory. J. Symb. Log. 49, 851–866 (1984)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Smarandache, F.: A unifying field in logics: neutrosophic logic. In: Philosophy, pp. 1–141. American Research Press (1999)

  13. Smarandache, F.: Plithogenic set, an extension of crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, and neutrosophic sets-revisited. Infinite Study 21, 153–166 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abdel-Basset, M., El-Hoseny, M., Gamal, A., Smarandache, F.: A novel model for evaluation Hospital medical care systems based on plithogenic sets. Artif. Intell. Med. 100, 1–8 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sankari, H., Abobala, M.: n-Refined neutrosophic modules. Infinite Study 36, 1–11 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., Smarandache, F., Elhoseny, M.: A new decision-making model based on plithogenic set for supplier selection. Cmc-Comput. Mater. Continua 66, 2751–2769 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu, Z., Xu, J.: Possibility distribution-based approach for MAGDM with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. IEEE. T. Cybern. 46, 694–705 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, Z., Wang, H.: On the syntax and semantics of virtual linguistic terms for information fusion in decision making. Inform. Fusion. 34, 43–48 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Inform. Sci. 8, 199–249 (1975)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Herrera, F., Martínez, L.: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy. Syst. 8, 746–752 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ye, J.M., Xu, Z., Gou, X.J.: Virtual linguistic trust degree-based evidential reasoning approach and its application to emergency response assessment of railway station. Inform. Sci. 513, 341–359 (2020)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Wei, G., Lu, M., Alsaadi, F.E., Hayat, T., Alsaedi, A.: Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 33, 1129–1142 (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodriguez, R.M., Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy. Syst. 20, 109–119 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Torra, V.: Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25, 529–539 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Pang, Q., Wang, H., Xu, Z.: Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Inform. Sci. 369, 128–143 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, Y., Xu, Z., Wang, H., Liao, H.: Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation. Appl. Soft. Comput. 49, 817–833 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gou, X., Xu, Z.: Novel basic operational laws for linguistic terms, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and probabilistic linguistic term sets. Inform. Sci. 372, 407–427 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, X.L., Xing, X.M.: Probabilistic linguistic VIKOR method to evaluate green supply chain initiatives. Sustainability Basel 9, 1231 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhai, Y., Xu, Z., Liao, H.: Probabilistic linguistic vector-term set and its application in group decision making with multi-granular linguistic information. Appl. Soft. Comput. 49, 801–816 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu, X., Liao, H., Xu, Z., Hafezalkotob, A., Herrera, F.: Probabilistic linguistic MULTIMOORA: a multicriteria decision making method based on the probabilistic linguistic expectation function and the improved Borda rule. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 26, 3688–3702 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wei, G., Wei, C., Wu, J., Guo, Y.: Probabilistic linguistic multiple attribute group decision making for location planning of electric vehicle charging stations based on the generalized Dice similarity measures. Artif. Intell. Rev. 54, 4137–4167 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, X., Gou, X., Xu, Z., Liao, H.: A projection method for multiple attribute group decision making with probabilistic linguistic term sets. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cyb. 10, 2515–2528 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lu, J., Wei, C., Wu, J., Wei, G.: TOPSIS method for probabilistic linguistic MAGDM with entropy weight and its application to supplier selection of new agricultural machinery products. Entropy-Switz. 21, 953 (2019)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, Z., Wu, C.: A novel method for single-valued neutrosophic multi-criteria decision making with incomplete weight information. Neutrosophic Sets Syst. 4, 35–49 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gou, X., Xu, Z., Liao, H.: Multiple criteria decision making based on Bonferroni means with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Soft. Comput. 21, 6515–6529 (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Chang, T.W., Lo, H.W., Chen, K.Y., Liou, J.J.: A novel FMEA model based on rough BWM and rough TOPSIS-AL for risk assessment. Mathematics Basel 7, 874–894 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Davoudabadi, R., Mousavi, S.M., Mohagheghi, V.: A new last aggregation method of multi-attributes group decision making based on concepts of TODIM, WASPAS and TOPSIS under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy uncertainty. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 62, 1371–1391 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pang, J., Guan, X., Liang, J., Wang, B., Song, P.: Multi-attribute group decision-making method based on multi-granulation weights and three-way decisions. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 117, 122–147 (2020)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Shyur, H.-J.: COTS evaluation using modified TOPSIS and ANP. Appl. Math. Comput. 177, 251–259 (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Qin, J.D., Liu, X.W., Pedrycz, W.: An extended VIKOR method based on prospect theory for multiple attribute decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Knowl.-Based. Syst. 86, 116–130 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gul, M., Celik, E., Aydin, N., Gumus, A.T., Guneri, A.F.: A state of the art literature review of vikor and its fuzzy extensions on applications. Appl. Soft. Comput. 46, 60–89 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Peng, X.D., Dai, J.G.: Approaches to single-valued neutrosophic MADM based on MABAC, TOPSIS and new similarity measure with score function. Neural. Comput. Appl. 29, 939–954 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H.: Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178, 514–529 (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Tavana, M., Di Caprio, D., Santos-Arteaga, F.J.: An extended stochastic VIKOR model with decision maker’s attitude towards risk. Inf. Sci. 432, 301–318 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Chatterjee, K., Samarjit, K.: Unified Granular-number-based AHP-VIKOR multi-criteria decision framework. Granul. Comput. 2, 199–221 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhou, W., Yin, W.Y., Peng, X.Q., Liu, F.M., Yang, F.: Comprehensive evaluation of land reclamation and utilisation schemes based on a modified VIKOR method for surface mines. Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 32, 93–108 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lin, M., Chen, Z., Xu, Z., Gou, X., Herrera, F.: Score function based on concentration degree for probabilistic linguistic term sets: an application to TOPSIS and VIKOR. Inform. Sci. 551, 270–290 (2021)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Li, Y., Liu, Y.S.: Extended VIKOR-QUALIFLEX method based on trapezoidal fuzzy two-dimensional linguistic information for multiple attribute decision-making with unknown attribute weight. Mathematics-Basel. 9, 37–63 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., Elhoseny, M., Chang, V.: Evaluation framework for smart disaster response systems in uncertainty environment. Mech. Syst. Signal. Pr. 145, 1–18 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gou, X., Xu, Z., Liao, H., Herrera, F.: Probabilistic double hierarchy linguistic term set and its use in designing an improved VIKOR method: the application in smart healthcare. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 72, 2611–2630 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Liu, P., You, X.: Probabilistic linguistic TODIM approach for multiple attribute decision-making. Granul. Comput. 2, 333–342 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wei, G., Wei, C., Wu, J., Wang, H.: Supplier selection of medical consumption products with a probabilistic linguistic MABAC method. Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He. 16, 5082 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H.: Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156, 445–455 (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Lei, F., Wei, G., Gao, H., Wu, J., Wei, C.: TOPSIS method for developing supplier selection with probabilistic linguistic information. Int. J. Fuzzy. Syst. 22, 749–759 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Xu, Z.: Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega 33, 249–254 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wang, Z.P., Peng, Z.W., Wang, H.C.: Research on probabilistic linguistic multi-attribute group decision making method based on improved possibility degree and distance measure. J. Math. Pract. Theory 11, 10–20 (2021)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Shen, L.L., Pang, X.D., Zhang, Q., Qian, G.: TODIM method based on probabilistic language term set and its application. J. Stat. Decis. 18, 80–83 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Chen, Z.S., Chin, K.S., Li, Y.L., Yang, Y.: Proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set for multiple criteria group decision making. Inform. Sci. 357, 61–87 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R.: A novel plithogenic TOPSIS- CRITIC model for sustainable supply chain risk management. J. Clean. Prod. 247, 119586 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mao, X.B., Wu, M., Dong, J.Y., Wan, S.P., Jin, Z.: A new method for probabilistic linguistic multi-attribute group decision making: application to the selection of financial technologies. Appl. Soft. Comput. 77, 155–175 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Liao, H.C., Jiang, L.S., Lev, B., Fujita, H.: Novel operations of PLTSs based on the disparity degrees of linguistic terms and their use in designing the probabilistic linguistic ELECTRE III method. Appl. Soft. Comput. 80, 450–464 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant No. 3132019353.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YL was responsible for the analysis and preparation of the manuscript; ZW and MF contributed to the structure and main idea of the article, the revision of the full text; and PW performed the data processing and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Lin.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, P., Lin, Y., Fu, M. et al. VIKOR Method for Plithogenic Probabilistic Linguistic MAGDM and Application to Sustainable Supply Chain Financial Risk Evaluation. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 25, 780–793 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-022-01401-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-022-01401-0

Keywords