Skip to main content
Log in

Research on the Comprehensive Evaluation of Grouting Quality Based on Fuzzy Rock Engineering System and Variable Fuzzy Set Theory

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grouting is a fundamental technology in engineering construction, and its grouting quality evaluation is a critical scientific problem. Proper and reasonable grouting quality evaluation is vital to ensure engineering safety. Standard research on grouting quality evaluation does not consider the uncertainty in the evaluation process and lacks multi-index comprehensive analysis. Because of the above problems, this paper puts forward a comprehensive evaluation method of grouting quality based on FRES-VFS. Firstly, based on the systematic analysis of relevant factors affecting grouting quality, the comprehensive evaluation of grouting quality is divided into three parts: the groutability before grouting, the rationality of design and construction, and the quality evaluation after grouting. Then, twelve indexes, such as the number of joints in the rock mass, the opening degree of the joint in the rock mass, the water permeability before grouting, the water–cement ratio of grout, the grouting pressure, the design parameters, the hole position, the borehole deviation rate, the construction parameters, the permeability, the compactness, and the durability after grouting, are selected to construct the rating index system. Secondly, the weight of each index in the index system is calculated based on the fuzzy rock engineering system (FRES) method. Furthermore, considering the uncertainty in the comprehensive evaluation of grouting quality, the uncertain mapping between evaluation grade and evaluation index is established using variable fuzzy set (VFS) theory. Finally, the comprehensive evaluation method based on FRES-VFS is applied to the Huanggou Pumped Storage Power Station grouting project in China, which provides a new idea for the comprehensive evaluation of grouting quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availibility

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed Tomography

AHP:

Analytic Hierarchy Process

D-AHP:

The D-number Analytic Hierarchy Process method

ANFIS:

Adaptive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System

FFR:

Fracture Filling Rate

RQD:

Rock Quality Grade

FRES:

Fuzzy Rock Engineering System

RES:

Rock Engineering System

TBM:

Tunnel Boring Machine

VFS:

Variable Fuzzy Set

ESQ:

Expert Semi-Quantitative

FIS:

Fuzzy Inference System

AWV:

Acoustic Wave Velocity

C i :

The cause value

I ij :

The influence of parameters

E i :

The effect value

n A, n B, n C, n D, n E :

The proportion of the number of experts who interact with each other when making group decisions or voting by experts

ω i :

The weight

w before, w d&c, w after :

The index weight of the three parts

w j :

Total weight of the index

w * :

The index weight of the three parts themselves

\(w_{s}^{ * }\) :

Each index’s weight in the three parts

h :

The multiple standard levels

i :

The multiple indexes

c :

The number of levels

x i :

The index

y ih, Y :

The index standard matrix

I ab :

The standard interval matrix of the index

I cd :

The variable range interval matrix of the index

M ih :

The point-valued matrix with a membership degree of 1

μ A (x i)h :

The relative membership degree of the levels

U A (u)h :

The comprehensive relative membership degree of the evaluation object

p :

The variable parameter

α :

The variable optimization criterion parameter

H, H t :

The level eigenvalue of the object

U nor :

The normalized matrix of comprehensive relative membership degree

\(\overline{H}\) :

The final evaluation result

References

  1. Hao, Z.Y., Li, C.G.: Application of the geophysical survey technology to test grout curtain effectiveness. Jilin Water Resour. 02, 11–15 (2003). (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xia, J.F., Yue, X.B., Zhang, S.K., Zheng, G.Y.: Quality check for dam curtain grouting by third party and effect evaluation. Yangtze River 06, 89–92 (2013). (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Qian, C.Y.: Discussion on quality evaluation of impervious wall and curtain grouting of an earth-rock dam of a reservoir. Eng. Constr. 4, 555–558 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bai, H.R., Li, J.J.: Evaluation of grouting effect detection in goaf. Appl. Mech. Mater. 438–439, 1080–1083 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, X.G., Yang, X.L., Fang, Y.Z.: Study on grouting effect evaluation of f4 weathered slot in Xiamen Xiang’an submarine tunnel. Appl. Mech. Mater. 256, 1217–1220 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu, Y.T., Han, Z.Q., Wang, C.Y., Zhou, J.F., Hu, S.: Grouting effect evaluation of dam foundation rock mass based on fracture filling characteristics. Rock Soil Mech. 38(S2), 311–316 (2017). (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu, Y., Wang, X., Deng, S.: Evaluation of curtain grouting efficiency by cloud model-based fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 23(3), 2852–2866 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar, P.S., Hussain, R.J.: A simple method for solving fully intuitionistic fuzzy real life assignment problem. Int. J. Oper. Res. Inf. Syst. 7(2), 39–61 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar, P.S.: PSK method for solving type-1 and type-3 fuzzy transportation problems. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. App. 5, 121–146 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, P.S.: A simple method for solving type-2 and type-4 fuzzy transportation problems. Int. J. Fuzzy Logic Intell. Syst. 16(4), 225–237 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeng, D.Z., He, Q.Y., Yu, Z.M., Jia, W.Y., Zhang, S., Liu, Q.P.: Risk assessment of sustained casing pressure in gas wells based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 46, 756–763 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, P., Feng, G.Q.: Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation to evaluate the effect of water flooding development. J. Petrol. Exploration Prod. Technol. 8(4), 1455–1463 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1), 87–96 (1986)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mizumoto, M., Tanaka, K.: Some properties of fuzzy sets of type 2. Inform Control 31, 312–340 (1976)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar, P.S.: A note on a new approach for solving intuitionistic fuzzy transportation problem of type-2. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manage. 29(1), 102–129 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Torra, V.: Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25(6), 529–539 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar, P.S.: Algorithms for solving the optimization problems using fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy set. Int. J. Syst. Assurance Eng. Manage. 11(1), 189–222 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar, P.S.: Intuitionistic fuzzy solid assignment problems: a software-based approach. Int. J. Syst. Assurance Eng. Manage. 10(4), 661–675 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar, P.S.: Developing a new approach to solve solid assignment problems under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. Appl. 9(1), 1–34 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar, P.S.: Computationally simple and efficient method for solving real-life mixed intuitionistic fuzzy 3D assignment problems. Int. J. Softw. Sci. Comput. Intell. (2022).

  22. Ahmed, G.Q., Sarah,S.L., Faisal, A. A fuzzy-based approach for cholera risk assessment and vaccine allocation. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2022).

  23. Peng, B., Zheng, C., Wei, G.: Risk assessment method on haze networks public opinion based on intuitionistic fuzzy choquet integral. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 24, 2858–2872 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fan, G., Zhong, D., Yan, F., Yu, P.: A hybrid fuzzy evaluation method for curtain grouting efficiency assessment based on an AHP method extended by D numbers. Expert Syst. App. 44(4), 289–303 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, X., Zhong, D., Ren, B., Fan, G., Cui, B.: Prediction of curtain grouting efficiency based on ANFIS. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 78(1), 281–309 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yan, F.G.: Theories and applications of unified grouting model and analysis in hydraulic and hydroelectric project. Tianjin University, Tianjing China (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Song, L., Yu, C.W.: A comprehensive evaluation model for curtain grouting efficiency assessment based on prospect theory and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets extended by improved d numbers. Energies 12, 3674 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hudson, J.A.: Rock engineering systems: theory and practice. Ellis Horwood Ltd, Chichester (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Aghababaei, S., Jalalifar, H., Saeedi, G.: Prediction of face advance rate and determination of the operation efficiency in retreat longwall mining panel using rock engineering system. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 6(3), 419–429 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Faramarzi, F., Mansouri, H., Farsangi, M.A.: A rock engineering systems based model to predict rock fragmentation by blasting. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 60, 82–94 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Frough, O., Torabi, S.R.: An application of rock engineering systems for estimating TBM downtimes. Eng. Geol. 157, 112–123 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hasanipanah, M., Armaghani, D.J., Monjezi, M.: Risk assessment and prediction of rock fragmentation produced by blasting operation: a rock engineering system. Environ. Earth Sci. 75(9), 808 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Naghadehi, M.Z., Jimenez, R., KhaloKakaie, R., Jalali, S.M.: A new open-pit mine slope instability index defined using the improved rock engineering systems approach. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 61, 1–14 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rafiee, R., Khalookakaie, R., Ataei, M., Jalali, S.M., Sereshki, F., Azarfar, A.: Improvement of rock engineering system coding using fuzzy numbers. J Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 30(2), 705–715 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rafiee, R., Mohammadi, S., Ataei, M., Khalookakaie, R.: Application of fuzzy RES and fuzzy DEMATEL in the rock behavioral systems under uncertainty. Geosyst. Eng. 22(1), 18–29 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rafiee, R., Ataei, M., Khalookakaie, R.: A new cavability index in block caving mines using fuzzy rock engineering system. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 77, 68–76 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen, S.Y., Guo, Y.: Variable fuzzy sets and their application to comprehensive risk evaluation for flood control engineering system. Adv. Sci. Technol. Water Resour. 5, 153–162 (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen, S.Y., Li, M.: Assessment model of water resources reproducible ability based on variable fuzzy set theory. J. Hydraul. Eng. 37, 431–435 (2006). (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  39. He, G., Chai, J., Qin, Y., Xu, Z.G., Li, S.Y.: Coupled model of variable fuzzy sets and the analytic hierarchy process and its application to the social and environmental impact evaluation of dam breaks. Water Resour. Manage 34(9), 2677–2697 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fang, Y., Zheng, X., Hui, P.: A new method of the relative membership degree calculation in variable fuzzy sets for water quality assessment. Ecol. Indicat. 98, 515–522 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yan, F., Liu, L., Zhang, Y., Chen, M.S., Chen, N.: The research of dynamic variable fuzzy set assessment model in water quality evaluation. Water Resour. Manage 30, 63–78 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gong, W., Chen, K., Huggins, T.J.: Risk evaluation based on variable fuzzy sets and information diffusion method. J. Appl. Math. Phys. 8(5), 821–830 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Li, X., Zhang, W., Wang, X., Wang, Z., Pang, C.: Evaluation on the risk of water inrush due to roof bed separation based on improved set pair analysis-variable fuzzy sets. ACS Omega 7(11), 9430–9442 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, Y., Xie, Y., Qi, L., He, Y., Bo, H.: Synergies evaluation and influencing factors analysis of the water- energy-food nexus from symbiosis perspective: a case study in the beijing-tianjin-hebei region. Sci. Total Environ. 818, 151731–151746 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jia, Wu., Yun, C., Jingyi, L.: One-at-a-time based weight sensitivity analysis in spatial multi-criteria decision making [J]. Resour. Sci. 36(9), 1870–1879 (2014). (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the project Funded by the Key projects of natural science basic research program of Shaanxi province (Grant Num. 2018JZ5010). The joint fund project of Natural science basic research program of Shaanxi province and Hanjiang to Weihe River Water Diversion Project Construction Co.Ltd. Shaanxi Province (Grant Num. 2019JLM-55) and the water science plan project of Shaanxi Province (Grant Num. 2018SLKJ-5).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Tong.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tong, F., Yang, J., Zheng, C. et al. Research on the Comprehensive Evaluation of Grouting Quality Based on Fuzzy Rock Engineering System and Variable Fuzzy Set Theory. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 25, 1191–1212 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-022-01433-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-022-01433-6

Keywords

Navigation