Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel MAGDM Technique Based on Q-rung Orthopair Fuzzy Aczel-Alsina Power Heronian Mean for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Organ Transplantation Networks for Healthcare Devices

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the intense competition in the market today, choosing of an appropriate healthcare device vendor in long-term organ transplant networks has emerged as a key issue in raising life expectancy. A complicated multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) process problem with several viable alternatives and sustainable criteria may be used for evaluating sustainable healthcare equipment vendors. The q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (QROFS) is more effective at expressing ambiguous and fuzzy information since it is a generalization of intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) and Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFS). The fact that QROFSs provide a wider range of acceptable membership grades and give decision-makers more leeway to express their real thoughts is their most valued feature. The Heronian mean (HM) operator and power aggregation (PA) operator are instances of classic aggregation operators. They are preferable because they can replicate the correlations between attributes and remove the negative effects of awkward information. The Aczel-Alsina t-norms, which were put out by Aczel and Alsina in 1982, constitute a very successful and widely used method for creating any type of aggregation operators. Additionally, the parameter Φ \(\in \left( {0, + \infty } \right)\) makes the Algebraic t-norms as a special case of the Aczel-Alsina t-norms. To take the above advantages, in this article, initially, the Aczel-Alsina (AA) operational laws are combined, with power average and Heronian mean operators to propose the QROFAA power Heronian aggregation (QROFPWHA) operator and QROFAA power geometric Heronian aggregation (QROFAAFPGHA) operator. Moreover, some core characteristics and various core cases with respect to the parameters are investigated and found that some of the existing aggregation defined on AA operational laws are special cases of the suggested aggregation operators. Secondly, the weighted forms of the suggested aggregation operators are initiated. Thirdly, based on these newly aggregation operators two novel MAGDM models with unknown weights of the decision makers and attributes are initiated. Finally, an illustrated example about evaluating sustainable healthcare equipment vendors is provided to assess the effectiveness of the suggested models, and a comparison analysis is provided to support and corroborate the suggested approaches. Additionally, assessment for key parameters in the proposed models is carried out to evaluate the implications on results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data Availability

Data is contained within the article.

References

  1. Devaraj, S., Kohli, R.: Information technology payoff in the health-care industry: a longitudinal study. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 16(4), 41–67 (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Usak, M., Kubiatko, M., Shabbir, M.S., Viktorovna Dudnik, O., Jermsittiparsert, K., Rajabion, L.: Health care service delivery based on the Internet of things: A systematic and comprehensive study. Int. J. Commun Syst 33(2), e4179 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Golinelli, D., Boetto, E., Carullo, G., Nuzzolese, A.G., Landini, M.P., Fantini, M.P.: Adoption of digital technologies in health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review of early scientific literature. J. Med. Internet Res. 22(11), e22280 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wizner, K., Gaspar, F.W., Biggio, A., Wiesner, S.: Occupational injuries in California’s health care and social assistance industry, 2009 to 2018. Health science reports 4(2), e306 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. MacNeill, A. J., Hopf, H., Khanuja, A., Alizamir, S., Bilec, M., Eckelman, M. J., ... & Sherman, J. D. (2020). Transforming the medical device industry: Road map to a circular economy: Study examines a medical device industry transformation. Health Affairs, 39(12), 2088–2097.

  6. DiMartini, Andrea F., Mary Amanda Dew, and Paula T. Trzepacz. “Organ transplantation.” Focus 3, no. 2 (2005): 280–303.

  7. Burra, P., De Bona, M.: Quality of life following organ transplantation. Transpl. Int. 20(5), 397–409 (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghadimi, P., Heavey, C.: Sustainable supplier selection in medical device industry: toward sustainable manufacturing. Procedia Cirp 15, 165–170 (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.H., Pourhossein, M., Yazdani, M., Zavadskas, E.K.: Evaluating construction projects of hotels based on environmental sustainability with MCDM framework. Alex. Eng. J. 57, 357–365 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zavadskas, E.K., Antucheviciene, J., Vilutiene, T., Adeli, H.: Sustainable decision-making in civil engineering, construction and building technology. Sustainability 10, 14 (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zavadskas, E.K., Šaparauskas, J., Antucheviciene, J.: Sustainability in construction engineering. Sustainability 10, 2236 (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hajighasemi, Z., Mousavi, S.M.: A new approach in failure modes and effects analysis based on compromise solution by considering objective and subjective weights with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 15, 139–161 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Mousavi, S.M., Mirdamadi, S., Siadat, A., Dantan, J., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.: An intuitionistic fuzzy grey model for selection problems with an application to the inspection planning in manufacturing firms. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 39, 157–167 (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Mousavi, S.M., Vahdani, B., Behzadi, S.S.: Designing a model of intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR in multi-attribute group decisionmaking problems. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 13, 45–65 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20, 87–96 (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Yager, R.R.: Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22(4), 958–965 (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Yager, R.R.: Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 25(5), 1222–1230 (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, P., Wang, P.: Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple-attribute decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(2), 259–280 (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Shu, X., Ai, Z., Xu, Z., Ye, J.: Integrations of q-rung orthopair fuzzy continuous information. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 27(10), 1974–1985 (2019)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Krishankumar, R., Ravichandran, K.S., Kar, S., Cavallaro, F., Zavadskas, E.K., Mardani, A.: Scientific decision framework for evaluation of renewable energy sources under q-rung orthopair fuzzy set with partially known weight information. Sustainability 11(15), 4202 (2019)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, P., Wang, P.: Multiple-attribute decision-making based on Archimedean Bonferroni operators of q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 27(5), 834–848 (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, P., Liu, W.: Multiple-attribute group decision-making based on power Bonferroni operators of linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 34(4), 652–689 (2019)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Wei, G., Gao, H., Wei, Y.: Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Heronian mean operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(7), 1426–1458 (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Beliakov, G., Pradera, A., Calvo, T.: Aggregation functions: a guide for practitioners, vol. 221. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang, W., Pang, Y.: New q-rung orthopair fuzzy partitioned Bonferroni mean operators and their application in multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 34(3), 439–476 (2019)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang, W., Pang, Y.: New q-rung orthopair fuzzy Bonferroni mean Dombi operators and their application in multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Access 8, 50587–50610 (2020)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, J., Gao, H., Wei, G., Wei, Y.: Methods for multiple-attribute group decision making with q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy information and their applications to the selection of green suppliers. Symmetry 11(1), 56 (2019)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Ju, Y., Luo, C., Ma, J., Wang, A.: A novel multiple-attribute group decision-making method based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy generalized power weighted aggregation operators. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 34(9), 2077–2103 (2019)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Yager, R.R.: The power average operator. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern Part A 31(6), 724–731 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Pinar, A., Boran, F.E.: A q-rung orthopair fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making method for supplier selection based on a novel distance measure. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 11(8), 1749–1780 (2020)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu, Z., Liu, P., Liang, X.: Multiple attribute decision-making method for dealing with heterogeneous relationship among attributes and unknown attribute weight information under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 33(9), 1900–1928 (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu, P., Chen, S.M., Wang, P.: Multiple-attribute group decision-making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy power maclaurin symmetric mean operators. IEEE Tran.s Syst Man Cyberne. 50(10), 3741–3756 (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Deveci, M., Pamucar, D., Cali, U., Kantar, E., Kölle, K., Tande, J.O.: Hybrid q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets based CoCoSo model for floating offshore wind farm site selection in Norway. CSEE J Power Energy Syst. 8(5), 1261–1280 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Riaz, M., Sałabun, W., Athar Farid, H.M., Ali, N., Wątróbski, J.: A robust q-rung orthopair fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations with application to sustainable energy planning decision management. Energies 13(9), 2155 (2020)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu, Y., Zeng, S., Carlos, L.A., Ullah, K., Yang, Y.: Social network group decision-making method based on Q-rung orthopair fuzzy set and its application in the evaluation of online teaching quality. Axioms 10(3), 168 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Akram, M., Shahzadi, G.: A hybrid decision-making model under q-rung orthopair fuzzy Yager aggregation operators. Granular Comput. 6(4), 763–777 (2021)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang, Z., Ouyang, T., Fu, X., Peng, X.: A decision-making algorithm for online shopping using deep-learning–based opinion pairs mining and q-rung orthopair fuzzy interaction Heronian mean operators. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 35(5), 783–825 (2020)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Seker, S., Bağlan, F.B., Aydin, N., Deveci, M., Ding, W.: Risk assessment approach for analyzing risk factors to overcome pandemic using interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy decision making method. Appl. Soft Comput. 132, 109891 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pınar, A., Babak Daneshvar, R., Özdemir, Y.S.: q-Rung orthopair fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection problem. Sustainability 13(2), 985 (2021)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Menger, K.: Statistical metrics. In: Selecta Mathematica, pp. 433–435. Springer, Vienna (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Riaz, M., Farid, H.M.A., Shakeel, H.M., Aslam, M., Mohamed, S.H.: Innovative q-rung orthopair fuzzy prioritized aggregation operators based on priority degrees with application to sustainable energy planning: A case study of Gwadar. AIMS Math. 6(11), 12795–12831 (2021)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Ai, Z., Xu, Z., Yager, R.R., Ye, J.: q-rung orthopair fuzzy integrals in the frame of continuous Archimedean t-norms and t-conorms and their application. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 29(5), 996–1007 (2020)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Darko, A.P., Liang, D.: Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making with modified EDAS method. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 87, 103259 (2020)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Venkatesan, D., Sriram, S.: On Lukasiewicz disjunction and conjunction of Pythagorean fuzzy matrices. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 7(6), 861–865 (2019)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Klement, E. P., Mesiar, R., & Pap, E. (2000). Triangular Norms.| Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht.

  46. Aczél, J., Alsina, C.: Characterizations of some classes of quasilinear functions with applications to triangular norms and to synthesizing judgements. Aequationes Math. 25(1), 313–315 (1982)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, N., Li, Q., Abd El-Latif, A.A., Yan, X., Niu, X.: A novel hybrid multibiometrics based on the fusion of dual iris, visible and thermal face images. In: 2013 international symposium on biometrics and security technologies, pp. 217–223. IEEE (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Senapati, T., Chen, G., Yager, R.R.: Aczel-Alsina aggregation operators and their application to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 37(2), 1529–1551 (2022)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Senapati, T., Chen, G., Mesiar, R., Yager, R.R.: Novel Aczel-Alsina operations-based interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications in multiple attribute decision-making process. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 37, 5059–5081 (2022)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Senapati, T., Mesiar, R., Simic, V., Iampan, A., Chinram, R., Ali, R.: Analysis of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Aczel-Alsina geometric aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision-making. Axioms 11(6), 258 (2022)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Senapati, T., Chen, G., Mesiar, R., Yager, R.R.: Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators in the framework of Aczel-Alsina triangular norms and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Expert Syst. Appl. 212, 118832 (2023)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Senapati, T., Martínez, L., Chen, G.: Selection of appropriate global partner for companies using q-rung orthopair fuzzy Aczel-Alsina average aggregation operators. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 25, 1–17 (2022)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Stević, Ž, Pamučar, D., Puška, A., Chatterjee, P.: Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Comput. Ind. Eng. 140, 106231 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S.K., Garg, C.P.: An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 140, 1686–1698 (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Puška, l. A., Kozarević, S., Stević, Z., & Stovrag, J. (2018). A new way of applying interval fuzzy logic in group decision making for supplier selection. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 52(2).

  56. Jana, C., Muhiuddin, G., Pal, M.: Some Dombi aggregation of Q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers in multiple-attribute decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 34(12), 3220–3240 (2019)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Stojić, G., Stević, Ž, Antuchevičienė, J., Pamučar, D., Vasiljević, M.: A novel rough WASPAS approach for supplier selection in a company manufacturing PVC carpentry products. Information 9(5), 121 (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Oztaysi, B., Onar, S.C., Goztepe, K., Kahraman, C.: Evaluation of research proposals for grant funding using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Soft. Comput. 21(5), 1203–1218 (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Salimian, S., Mousavi, S.M., Antucheviciene, J.: an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy model based on extended VIKOR and MARCOS for sustainable supplier selection in organ transplantation networks for healthcare devices. Sustainability 14(7), 3795 (2022)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Saha, A., Mishra, A.R., Rani, P., Hezam, I.M., Cavallaro, F.: A q-rung orthopair fuzzy FUCOM double normalization-based multi-aggregation method for healthcare waste treatment method selection. Sustainability 14(7), 4171 (2022)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This paper is supported by Taishan Scholars Project of Shandong Province, Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Program(Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project) (Nos. 2021SFGC0102, 2020CXGC010110), Major bidding projects of National Social Science Fund of China (No. 19ZDA080).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Peide Liu or Qaisar Khan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, P., Khan, Q., Jamil, A. et al. A Novel MAGDM Technique Based on Q-rung Orthopair Fuzzy Aczel-Alsina Power Heronian Mean for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Organ Transplantation Networks for Healthcare Devices. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 26, 121–153 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-023-01580-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-023-01580-4

Keywords