Skip to main content
Log in

Machine learning approach for classification of Parkinson disease using acoustic features

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is common disorder for many people and is not easy to diagnose. It is a neurological disorder. The authors proposed a novel approach using data partitioning with feature selection algorithm Principal component analysis (PCA) for Parkinson’s disease classification. In the proposed approach, the dataset has been divided into three equal parts and validated two-class (healthy and Parkinson’s disease) for individual data with different classifiers based on acoustic features. To improve performance of classifying algorithms Principal Component Analysis (PCA) has been used. The minority and majority classes were obtained by applying the data set partition approach to the dataset of healthy and Parkinson’s disease subjects. The three equal partitions of were composed for healthy (first case), and then for PD class (second case). PCA was used for features selection. We used three different classifiers to classify all data partitions, including the weighted k-NN (nearest neighbour, wkNN), Logistic Regression (LR), and Medium Gaussian Kernel support vector machine (MGSVM). The classification accuracy of 74.2%, 85.0% and 82.1% achieved using Logistic algorithm, SVM with Gaussian, and weighted k-NN classifiers. The combination of classifiers, data partition and feature selection (first case) achieved classification accuracy of 80%, 87.63% and 89.23% respectively. In the second case, 85.2%, 89.36% and 90.3% accuracy with data partition and feature selection are obtained respectively. The results show that the proposed methodology could be used for Parkinson’s disease classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. https://indianapolyclinic.com/stem-cell-treatment-program/kb/stem-cells-and-parkinson-disease-finding-a-cure.

  2. Sveinbjornsdottir S (2016) The clinical symtoms of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem 139(suppl 1):318–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carroll William M (2016) International neurology. John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  4. https://ww.medicinenet.com/parkinsons_disease/article.htm

  5. Rusz J, Bonnet C, Klempr J, Tykalová T, Baborová E, Novotný M, Rulseh A, Ružicka E (2015) Speech disorders reflect differing pathophysiology in Parkinson’s disease, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Multiple System Atrophy. J Neurol 262:992–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saxena M, Behari M, Kumaran SS, Goyal V, Narang V (2014) Assessing speech dysfunction using BOLD and acoustic analysis in Parkinsonism. Park Relat Disord 20:855–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. New AB, Robin DA, Parkinson AL, Eickhoff CR, Reetz K, Hoffstaedter F, Mathys C, Sudmeyer M, Michely J, Caspers J et al (2015) the intrinsic resting state voice network in Parkinson’s disease. Hum Brain Mapp 36:1951–1962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sapir S (2014) Multiple factors are involved in the dysarthria associated with Parkinson’s disease: a review with implications for clinical practice and research. J Speech Lang Hear Res 57:1330–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Galaz Z, Mekyska J, Mzourek Z, Smekal Z, Rektorova I, Eliasova I, Kostalova M, Mrackova M, Berankova D (2016) Prosodic analysis of neutral, stress-modified and rhymed speech in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 127:301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pawlukowska W, Gołab-Janowska M, Safranow K, Rotter I, Amernik K, Honczarenko K, Nowacki P (2015) Articulation disorders and duration, severity and L-Dopa dosage in idiopathic Parkinson’s Disease. Neurol Neurochir Pol 49:302–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lirani-Silva C, Mourão LF, Gobbi LTB (2015) Dysarthria and quality of life in neurologically healthy elderly and patients with Parkinson’s disease. CoDAS 27:248–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blumin JH, Pcolinsky DE, Atkins JP (2004) Laryngeal findings in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 113:253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martens H, Nuffelen G, Wouters K, Bodt M (2016) Reception of communicative functions of prosody in hypokinetic dysarthria due to Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinsons Dis 6:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sachin S, Shukla G, Goyal V, Singh S, Aggarwal V, Behari M (2008) Clinical speech impairment in Parkinson’s disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and multiple system atrophy. Neurol India 56:122–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chenausky K, MacAuslan J, Goldhor R (2011) Acoustic analysis of PD speech. Parkinsons Dis 2011:435232

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coronato A, Cuzzocrea A (2015) an innovative risk assessment methodology for medical information systems. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 13:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  17. Biagetti G, Crippa P, Falaschetti L, Tanoni G, Turchetti C (2018) A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for physiological classification. Proc Computer Sci 126:1977–1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hariharan M, Kemal P, Sindhu R (2014) A new hybrid intelligent system for accurate detection of Parkinson’s disease. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 113(3):904–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paragliola G, Coronato A (2018) Gait anomaly detection of subjects with Parkinson’s disease using a deep time series-based approach. IEEE Access 6:73280–73292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Deepak J, Aayushi K, Pradeep J (2017) An automatic non-invasive method for Parkinson’s disease classification. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 145:135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Okan Sakar C, Gorkem S, Aysegul G, Tunc Hunkar C, Hatice N, Erdogdu SB et al (2019) A comparative analysis of speech signal processing algorithms for Parkinson’s disease classification and the use of the tunable Q-factorwavelet transform. Appl Soft Comput 74:255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wei Z, Chengzhi Y, Qinghui W, Fenglin L, Ying W (2019) Classification of gait patterns between patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls usingphase space reconstruction (PSR), empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and neuralnetworks. Neural Netw 111:64–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ujjwal G, Hritik B, Deepak J (2020) An improved sex-specific and age-dependent classification model for Parkinson’s diagnosis using handwriting measurement. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 189:105305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Imanne EM, Guillaume-Alexandre B, Wassim B (2020) Deep 1DConvnetfor accurate Parkinson disease detection and severity prediction from gait. Expert Syst Appl 143:113075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Parkinson+Dataset+with+replicated+acoustic+features

  26. Polat K, Nour M (2020) Parkinson disease classification using one againsts all based data sampling with the acoustic features from speech signals. Med Hypotheses 140:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nihat D, Majid N, Kemal P (2020) A novel demodulation structure for quadrate modulation signals using the segmentary neural network modelling. Appl Acoust 164:107251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Juliana T, Meurer William J (2016) Logistic regression relating patient characteristics to outcomes. JAMA 316(5):533–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Walker SH, Duncan DB (1967) Estimation of the probability of an event as a function of several independent variables. Biometrika 54(1/2):167–178

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Tue T (2009) Coefficients of determination in logistic regression models. Am Stat 9:366–372. https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.08210

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Corinna C, Vapnik Vladimir N (1995) Support-vector networks. Machine Learn 20(3):273–297

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Asa B-H, David H, Hava S, Vapnik Vladimir N (2001) Support vector clustering. J Machine Learn Res 2:125–137

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Dennis DC (2002) Training invariant support vector machines. Machine Learn 46:161–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Altman NS (1992) An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. Am Statist 46(3):175–185

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Samworth RJ (2012) Optimal weighted nearest neighbour classifiers. Ann Statist 40(5):2733–2763. https://doi.org/10.1214/12-AOS1049

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Peter H, Park Byeong U, Samworth Richard J (2008) Choice of neighbor order in nearest-neighbor classification. Ann Stat 36(5):2135–2152

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Nihat D, Zafer C, Kemal P (2020) Automatic determination of digital modulation types with different noises using convolutional neural network based on time–frequency information. Appl Soft Comput 86:105834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Omid M, Mahmoudi A, Omid M (2010) Development of Pistachio sorting system using principal component analysis (PCA) assisted artificial neural network (ANN) of impact acoustics. Expert Syst Appl 37:7205–7212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lizbeth N, Perez Carlos J, Yolanda C-R, Jacinto M (2016) Addressing voice recording replications for Parkinson’s disease detection. Expert Syst Appl 46:286–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lizbeth N, Perez Carlos J, Yolanda C-R (2017) A two-stage variable selection and classification approach for parkinson’s disease detection by using voice recording replications. Computer methods Program Biomed 142:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Special Manpower Development Program, Chip-to-System Design (SMDP-C2SD), funded by the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology (MeitY), Govt. of India, as well as NIT kurukshetra for providing lab facilities in the School of VLSI Design and Embedded Systems.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikas Mittal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mittal, V., Sharma, R.K. Machine learning approach for classification of Parkinson disease using acoustic features. J Reliable Intell Environ 7, 233–239 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-021-00141-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-021-00141-6

Keywords

Navigation