Abstract
Qiu (Notes on automata theory based on quantum logic, Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2007, 50(2)154–169) discovered that some basic issues in orthomodular lattice-valued automata rely on bi-implication operator satisfying following condition:
and discovered that bi-implication operator based on Sasaki arrow satisfies this condition if and only if the truth-value lattice L is indeed a Boolean algebra, then asked a question of whether the result is also applied to other four quantum implication operators. We show that the answer is yes, and discuss several other conditions.
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Ying MS (2000) Automata theory based on quantum logic I. Int J Theor Phys 39:981–991
Ying MS (2000) Automata theory based on quantum logic II. Int J Theor Phys 39:2545–2557
Ying MS (2005) A theory of computation based on quantum logic(I). Theor Comput Sci 344:134–207
Qiu DW (2004) Automata theory based on quantum logic: some characterizations. Inf Comput 190:179–195
Qiu DW (2007) Automata theory based on quantum logic: reversibilities and pushdown automata. Theor Comput Sci 386:38–56
Qiu DW (2007) Notes on automata theory based on quantum logic. Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci 50 (2):154–169
Chiara MLD, Giuntini R, Greechie R (2004) Reasoning in quantum theory: sharp and unsharp quantum logics. Springer, Netherlands
Birkhoff G, von Neumann J (1936) The logic of quantum mechanics. Ann Math 37:823–843
Chiara MLD (1986) Quantum logic. In: Gabbay D, Guenthner F (eds) Handbook of philosophical logic, vol III. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 427–469
Kalmbach G (1983) Orthomodular lattices. In: London math soc monographs, vol 18. Academic Press, London
Finch PD (1970) Quantum logic as an implicatiom algebra. Bull Austral Math Soc 2:101–106
Román L, Rumbos B (1991) Quantum logic revisited. Found Phys 21:727–734
Mittelstaedt P (1978) Quantum logic. Reidel, Dordrecht
Pavičić M, Megill ND (1999) Non-orthomodular models for both standard quantum logic and standard classical logic: repercussions for quantum computers. Helv Phys Acta 72:189–210
Megill ND, Pavičić M (2000) Equations, states, and lattices of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Int J Theor Phys 39:2337–2379
Jin J, Li Y, Li C (2007) Robustness of fuzzy reasoning via logically equivalence measure. Inform Sci 177:5103–5117
Dai S, Pei D, Guo D (2013) Robustness analysis of full implication inference method. Int J Approx Reason 54:653–666
Georgescu I (2007) Similarity of fuzzy choice functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 158:1314–1326
Li Y (2008) Approximation and robustness of fuzzy finite automata. Int J Approx Reason 47:247–257
Qiu DW (2001) Automata theory based on complete residuated lattice-valued logic(I). Sci China (F) 44:419–429
Qiu DW (2002) Automata theory based on complete residuated lattice-valued logic(II). Sci China (F) 45:442–452
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the referees for their very valuable comments and recommendations.
Funding
This project was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62006168).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dai, S. A note on implication operators of quantum logic. Quantum Mach. Intell. 2, 15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42484-020-00029-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42484-020-00029-3