Skip to main content
Log in

Exercise recommendation method based on knowledge tracing and concept prerequisite relations

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the development of technology, the teaching environment has changed greatly. As an educational resource, exercise plays an important role in students’ personalized learning service. Therefore, how to recommend appropriate exercises to students is a key problem to be solved urgently. The exercise recommendation method analyses students’ history answer sequences and provides personalized exercise recommendation service for students. Previous exercise recommendation methods assume that students’ knowledge states are fixed, so these methods cannot recommend exercise according to the changes of student ability. In addition, the existing methods do not take concept prerequisite relations into consideration. In this paper, we propose Exercise Recommendation method based on Knowledge Tracing and Concept Prerequisite relations (ER-KTCP). Firstly, ER-KTCP can capture the changes of students’ knowledge states. Secondly, ER-KTCP can adjust the details of recommendation strategy according to the changes of students’ knowledge states. Thirdly, ER-KTCP recommends exercises according to the relations between concepts and the difficulty of exercises, which makes selected exercises more reasonable. Besides, we propose a new metric to evaluate the improvement of student’s score after he has done the recommended exercises. Experiments on multiple data sets show that ER-KTCP performs better in exercise recommendation than state-of-the-art methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ba, J.L., Kiros, J.R., Hinton, G.E.: Layer normalization[J]. Stat 1050, 21 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Badache, I., Fournier, S., Chifu, A.-G.: Harnessing ratings and aspect-sentiment to estimate contradiction intensity in temporal-related reviews[J]. Procedia Comput. Sci. 112, 1711–1720 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breese, J.S., Heckerman, D., Kadie, C.: Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering[C]. Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 43–52 (1998)

  • Bridge, R.G.: All our children learning: Benjamin S. Bloom. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981. Pp. 275. $14.95 (cloth).[J]. Econ. Educ. Rev. 2(2): 197–200 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(82)90042-5

  • Chuan, Y., Jieping, X., Xiaoyong, D.U.: Recommendation algorithm combining the user-based classified regression and the item-based filtering[C]. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Electronic Commerce: The New e-Commerce: Innovations for Conquering Current Barriers, Obstacles and Limitations to Conducting Successful Business on the Internet, pp. 574–578 (2006)

  • Dai, Z., Yang, Z., Yang, Y., et al.: Transformer-XL: attentive language models beyond a fixed-length context[C]. ACL (1) (2019)

  • Dascalu, M.I., Bodea, C.N., Moldoveanu, A., et al.: A recommender agent based on learning styles for better virtual collaborative learning experiences[J]. Comput. Hum. Behav. 45(1), 243–253 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De La Torre, J.: The generalized DINA model framework[J]. Psychometrika 76(2), 179–199 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dibello, L.V., Roussos, L.A., Stout, W.: 31A review of cognitively diagnostic assessment and a summary of psychometric models[J]. Handbook Statist. 26(06), 979–1030 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7161(06)26031-0

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S.E., Reise, S.P.: Item response theory[M]. Psychology Press (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, A., Pool, R.: Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise[M]. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (2016)

  • Haertel, E.: An application of latent class models to assessment data[J]. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 8(3), 333–346 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168400800311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., et al.: Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90

  • Junker, B.W., Sijtsma, K.: Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory[J]. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 25(3), 258–272 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/01466210122032064

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B.M., Li, Q., Park, C.S., et al.: A new approach for combining content-based and collaborative filters[J]. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 27(1), 79–91 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koren, Y., Bell, R., Volinsky, C.: Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems[J]. Computer 42(8), 30–37 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.D., Seung, H.S.: Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization[J]. Nature 401(6755), 788–791 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Linden, G., Smith, B., York, J.: Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering[J]. IEEE Internet Comput. 7(1), 76–80 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maimaimaia12318. Education data sets: doudouyun[OL]. https://blog.csdn.net/maimaimaia12138/article/details/115521865, 2021–04–08.

  • Mnih, A., Salakhutdinov, R.R.: Probabilistic matrix factorization[J]. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 20 (2007)

  • Niu, W., Niu, Z., Tang, S., et al.: A learning resource recommendation method combining user sequential interaction with collaborative filtering[C]. Modell. Identific. Control. 2015.

  • Pandey, P., Karypis, G.: A self attentive model for knowledge tracin[C]. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (2019)

  • Piech, C., Spencer, J., Huang, J. et al.: Deep knowledge tracing[J/OL]. arXiv:1506.05908[cs], 2015[2021–10–07]

  • Qi, B., Zou, H., Wang, Y., et al.: Question recommendation based on collaborative filtering and cognitive diagnosis[J]. Comput. Sci. 46(11), 235–240 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G.: On general laws and the meaning of measurement[C]. In: Psychology. Proceedings 4tb Berkeley Symposium Mathematics Statistics and Probability. 5: 321–333 (1961)

  • Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., et al.: Grouplens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews[C]. Proc. ACM Conf. Comput. Support. Cooperat. Work 1994, 175–186 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollinson, J.E.: From predictive models to instructional policies [J/OL]. Int. Educ. Data Min. Soc. (2015) [2021–10–07].

  • Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., et al.: Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms[C]. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 285–295 (2001)

  • Shan, R., Luo, Y., Sun, Y.: Collaborative filtering algorithm based on cognitive diagnosis[J]. Comput. Syst. Appl. 27(03), 136–142 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Z., Anbarasan, M., Praveen, K.D.: Design of online intelligent English teaching platform based on artificial intelligence techniques[J]. Comput. Intell. 37(3), 1166–1180 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Torre, D.L.J.: DINA model and parameter estimation: a didactic[J]. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 34(1), 115–130 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998607309474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Loan, C.F.: Generalizing the singular value decomposition[J]. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 13(1), 76–83 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., et al. Attention is all you need[C]. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 5998–6008 (2017)

  • Vukicevic, M., Jovanovic, M.Z., Delibasic, B., et al.: Recommender system for selection of the right study program for Higher Education students[J]. In: Hofmann, M., Klinkenberg, R., (eds) RapidMiner: Data Mining Use Cases and Business Analytics Applications (2013)

  • Walker, A.E., Recker, M.M., Lawless, K., et al.: Collaborative information filtering: a review and an educational application[J]. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 14(1), 1–26 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C.: Learning resource recommendation method based on particle swarm optimization algorithm [J]. J. Comput. Appl. 34(05), 1350–1353 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, C. K., Yeung, D.Y.: Addressing two problems in deep knowledge tracing via prediction-consistent regularization[C/OL]. In: the Fifth Annual ACM Conference.[2021–10–07]

  • Yu, J., Luo, G., Xiao, T., et al.: MOOCCube: a large-scale data repository for NLP applications in MOOCs[C]. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 3135–3142 (2020)

  • Zhang, J., Shi, X., King, I., et al.: Dynamic key-value memory networks for knowledge tracing[C]. In: International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, pp. 765–774 (2017)

  • Zhu, T., Huang, Z., Chen, E., et al.: Cognitive diagnosis based personalized question recommendation method[J]. Chin. J. Comput. 40(01), 176–191 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express gratitude to all those who helped us during the writing of this paper, including but not limited to Zhijing Sun of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Youming Zhang of Newyork University, Haochen Zhang of University of Birmingham, Yida Zhang of Purdue University.

Funding

This research was supported by Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangzhong Sun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, Y., Wang, H., Pan, Y. et al. Exercise recommendation method based on knowledge tracing and concept prerequisite relations. CCF Trans. Pervasive Comp. Interact. 4, 452–464 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42486-022-00109-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42486-022-00109-2

Keywords

Navigation