Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

VADiRSYRem: VANET-Based Diagnosis and Response System for Remote Locality

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The advancement in telemedicine has been helpful in the development of smart healthcare in urban and rural areas. In India, however, this solution often falls short of connecting the remote villages with modern healthcare due to the difficulty in accessibility. In a developing country like India, consisting of geographically remote settlements, it is not feasible to provide infrastructure-based health support to all. To conquer this difficulty, an alternative solution is required in which the existing network infrastructure is not essential for the communication purposes. The main objective of this proposal is to provide an alternative approach for the transmission of health care related messages. It is also important to minimize the cost of this type of healthcare services by avoiding the establishment of communication network across the country. Here, we propose the framework of an IoT-based system to work as an aid for quicker diagnosis and health support for the remote villagers. We have used vehicular ad hoc network for cost-effective and fast data transportation, besides other advantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 2011. https://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/prov_results_paper1_india.html.

  2. 2017. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/less-than-one-doctor-for-1000-population-in-india-government-tells-lok-sabha-4760892/.

  3. Gope P, Hwang T. BSN-care: a secure IoT-based modern healthcare system using body sensor network. IEEE Sens J. 2016;16:5. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2015.2502401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jansi R, Amutha R, Radha S. Remote monitoring of children with chronic illness using wearable vest, Telemedicine Technologies. In: book: Telemedicine Technologies, pp 121–137. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816948-3.00008-8.

  5. Gopu G, Anitha T, Nagarajapandian M, Prabhakaran M. Investigation of telecardiology system to detect cardiac abnormalities. Telemed Technol. 2019;2019:43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu T, Redouté J, Yuce M. An autonomous wireless body area network implementation towards IoT connected healthcare applications. IEEE Access. 2017;2017:5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2716344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Naranjo PGV, Shojafar M, Mostafaei H, Pooranian Z, Baccarelli E. P-SEP: a prolong stable election routing algorithm for energy-limited heterogeneous fog-supported wireless sensor networks. J Supercomput. 2017;73:733–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saleh N, Kassem A, Haidar AM. Energy-efficient architecture for wireless sensor networks in healthcare applications. IEEE Access. 2018;6:6478–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang H, Zhang H, Pirbhulal S, Wu W, Albuquerque VHCD. Active balancing mechanism for imbalanced medical data in deep learning-based classification models. ACM Trans Multimedia Comput Commun Appl. 2020;16:39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pirbhulal S, Samuel OW, Wu W, Sangaiah AK, Li G. A joint resource-aware and medical data security framework for wearable healthcare systems. Future Gener Comput Syst. 2019;95:382–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Am T, Dm W, Kb E, Ms M, Jc GGS. Telehealth: mapping the evidence for patient outcomes from systematic reviews. In: Technical Brief No. 26, AHRQ Publication No. 16-EHC034-EF, Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016.

  12. McFarland S, Coufopolous A, Lycett D. The effect of telehealth versus usual care for home-care patients with long-term conditions: a systematic review, meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X19862956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, Dixon J, Doll H, Hirani S. Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomized trial. BMJ. 2012;2012:344. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e3874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Versteeg H, Timmermans I, Widdershoven J, Kimman GJ, Prevot S, Rauwolf T. Effect of remote monitoring on patient- reported outcomes in european heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: primary results of the REMOTE-CIED randomized trial. Eurospace. 2019;21(9):1360–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euz140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guedon-Moreau L, Lacroix D, Sadout N, Clementy J, Kouakam C, Hermida JS. Costs of remote monitoring vs. ambulatory follow-ups of implanted cardioverter defibrillators in the randomized ECOST study. Europace. 2014;16(8):1181–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. HAS, Remote monitoring systems for automatic implantable cardiac defibrillators. 2017. https://www.has-sante.far//jcms/c.2790581/fr/systems-de-telesurveillance-pour-defibrillateurs-cardiaques-automatiques-implantables.

  17. Hindricks G, Taborsky M, Glikson M, Heinrich U, Schumacher B, Katz A, et al. Implant-based multiparameter telemonitoring of patient with heart failure (in time); a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9943):583–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61176-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Crossley GH, Boyle A, Vitense H, Chang Y, Mead RH. The CONNECT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinical alerts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(10):1181–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guedon-Moreau L, Lacroix D, Sadoul N, Clementy J, Kouakam C, Hermids JS, et al. A randomized study of remote follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: safety and efficacy report of the ECOST trial. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(8):605–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Crossley GH, Chen J, Choucair W, Cohen TJ, Gohn DC, Johnson WB, et al. Clinical benefit of remote versus trans telephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(22):2012–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Varma N, Epstein AE, Irimpen A, Schweikert R, Love C. Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces, Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) trial. Circulation. 2010;122(4):325–32. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.937409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mabo P, Victor F, Bazin P, Ahres S, Baduty D, Da Costa A, et al. A randomized trial of long-term remote monitoring of pacemaker recipients (The COMPAS trial). Eur Heart J. 2012;33(9):1105–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Amara W, Montagnier C, Cheggour S, Boursier M, Gully C, Barnay C, et al. Early detection and treatment of atrial arrhythmias alleviates the arrhythmic burden in paced patients: the SETAM study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40(5):527–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.13062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Boriani G, Da Costa A, Ricci RP, Quesada A, Favale S, Iacopino S, et al. The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiacpatiEnts (MORE-CARE) randomized controlled trial: phase 1 results on dynamics of early intervention with remote monitoring. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e167. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Slotwiner D, Varma N, Akar JG, Annas G, Beardsall M, Fogel Rl, et al. HRS Expert Consensus Statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(7):e69-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.008 (Epub 2015 May 14).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. White G. Active queue management in DOCSIS® 31 networks. IEEE Commun Mag. 2015;2015:0163-6804/15.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Khan I, Qureshi I, Shah SB, Akhlaq M, Safi E, et al. Comparative analysis and route optimization of state-of-the-art routing protocols. EAI Endorsed Trans Mobile Commun Appl. 2018;3:13. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.22-3-2018.154385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barua M, Liang X, Lu R, et al. RCare: extending secure health care to rural area using VANETs. Mobile Netw Appl. 2014;19:318–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-013-0446-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Technology, JIS College of Engineering, Kalyani, West Bengal, India

    Suparna DasGupta

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

    Sankhayan Choudhury

  3. A. K. Choudhury School of Information Technology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

    Rituparna Chaki

Authors
  1. Suparna DasGupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sankhayan Choudhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rituparna Chaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suparna DasGupta.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “Applications of Software Engineering and Tool Support” guest edited by Nabendu Chaki, Agostino Cortesi and Anirban Sarkar”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DasGupta, S., Choudhury, S. & Chaki, R. VADiRSYRem: VANET-Based Diagnosis and Response System for Remote Locality. SN COMPUT. SCI. 2, 41 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00430-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00430-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation