Abstract
Evolutionary Computations have risen from rather humble beginnings to a well-regarded and flexible technique that is imperative to the needs of modern intelligent computations. This introduction to this special issue provides both a historical perspective and a current characterization of the context in which Evolutionary Computations have evolved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Availability of Data and Material
Not applicable.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Angeline PJ. Evolution revolution: an introduction to the special track on genetic and evolutionary programming. IEEE Expert. 1995;10(3):6–10 (Guest editor’s introduction).
Goldberg D. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Reading: Addison-Wesley Professional; 1989.
Angeline PJ. Genetic programming’s continued evolution. In: Angeline PJ, Kinnear Jr. KE, editors. Advances in genetic programming 2, chapter 1. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1996. p. 1–20.
Schwefel H-P. Evolution and optimum seeking. New York: Wiley; 1995.
Fogel LJ, Owens AJ, Walsh MJ. Artificial intelligence through simulated evolution. New York: Wiley; 1966.
Rogers S, Bonissone P, Michalewicz Z (eds) Proceedings of the IEEE world congress on computational intelligence, 1994.
Global spending on AI ‘expected to double in four years’, says IDC. AINews. https://artificialintelligence-news.com/2020/08/27/global-spending-ai-110-billion-2024/.
Kelly K. The inevitable: understanding the 12 technological forces that will shape our future. Random House, 2017.
Megginson L. Lessons from Europe for American Business. In: Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, vol. 44, 1963. p. 4.
Godin S. All marketers are liars: the power of telling authentic stories in a low-trust world. Penguin Group; 2005.
Dennett D. Darwin’s dangerous idea: evolution and the meanings of life. Simon & Schuster; 1996.
Oppenheimer D. New and improved solver. 2009. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/blog/2009/09/21/new-and-improved-solver/.
Hao K. Training a single AI model can emit as much carbon as five cars in their lifetimes. MIT Technology Review, June 6, 2019, https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/06/06/239031/training-a-single-ai-model-can-emit-as-much-carbon-as-five-cars-in-their-lifetimes/.
Ananthaswamy A. AI’s next big leap, knowable magazine. 10/14/2020. https://knowablemagazine.org/article/technology/2020/what-is-neurosymbolic-ai.
d’Avila Garcez A, Lamb LC. Neurosymbolic AI: the 3rd wave. Cornell University. arXiv.org, arXiv:2012.05876.
Garnelo M, Shanahan M. Reconciling deep learning with symbolic artificial intelligence: representing objects and relations. Sci Direct. 2019;29:17–23.
Nielsen M, Chuang I. Quantum computing and quantum information. Cambridge University Press; 2010.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Not applicable.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Not applicable.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the topical collection “Evolution, the New AI Revolution” guest edited by Anikó Ekárt and Anna Isabel Esparcia-Alcázar.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Angeline, P.J. The Revolution Continues. SN COMPUT. SCI. 2, 415 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00798-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00798-z