Abstract
Rainfall estimation is essential for many reasons. The lack of rainfall monitoring and estimation infrastructure in some parts of the world, including sub-Saharan Africa, is a serious problem with severe consequences. For this reason, the possibility to use mobile network infrastructure, which are in continuous expansion all over the world, to monitor and estimate rainfall has been widely investigated during the last 2 decades. One of the critical tasks in the process of rainfall estimation using microwave links is the detection of rainy periods. Many methods have been proposed to realize this task in the literature, with satisfaction and underlying uncertainties resulting from mobile networks’ infrastructures and modeling assumptions. Machine learning has been proven to be very powerful for classification tasks and patterns recognition in high-dimensional data, as evidenced by many applications in various fields of science and engineering. Deep learning in particular has been recently used to improve the wet–dry periods classification task in rainfall estimation using commercial microwave links. In this paper, we propose to use other machine learning techniques for the classification of dry and wet periods using commercial microwave link data. We evaluate and compare the ability of single machine learning classifiers, ensemble machine learning classifiers, and clustering algorithms to successfully realize this task. We consider a sample of four microwave links located in the Netherlands (Western Europe), for which minimum and maximum received signal levels are recorded for each 15 min period from 30/05/2012 to 01/09/2012. In general, the considered algorithms are performant for this classification task, particularly for ensemble machine learning classifiers, among which an ensemble voting classifier emerges as a good first choice with an overall accuracy, and precision of wet periods detection very close to 100%. Its precision of dry periods’ detection is also close to 100% for the majority of the considered microwave links. These results show that machine learning classifiers are very effective for the classification of wet and dry periods for rainfall measurement using microwave links, and outperform some empirical and classical model-based methods available in the literature.













Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Available online at https://climate4impact.eu/.
References
Overeem A, Leijnse H, Uijlenhoet R. Country-wide rainfall maps from cellular communication networks. PNAS Environ Sci. 2013;110(8):2741–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217961110.
Upton G, Holt AR, Cummings RJ, Rahimi AR, Goddard JWF. Microwave links: the future for urban rainfall measurement? Atmos Res. 2005;77(1–4):300–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2004.10.009.
Zinevich A, Messer H, Alpert P. Prediction of rainfall intensity measurement errors using commercial microwave communication links. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2010;3(5):1385–402. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1385-2010.
Bratko I. Applications of machine learning: towards knowledge synthesis. New Gen Comput. 1993;11(3–4):343–60.
Meesad P. Thai fake news detection based on information retrieval, natural language processing and machine learning. SN Comput Sci. 2021;2(6):425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00775-6.
Surianarayanan C, Chelliah PR. Leveraging artificial intelligence (ai) capabilities for covid-19 containment. New Gen Comput 1–25 (2021)
Marak DCB, Halder A, Kumar A: Semi-supervised ensemble learning for efficient cancer sample classification from mirna gene expression data. New Gen Comput 1–27 (2021)
Abubakar A. Machine learning for geoscience applications. In: 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019 Workshop Programme (2019). https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901987
Matthew JC, Anya MR: Geological mapping using remote sensing data: a comparison of five machine learning algorithms, their response to variations in the spatial distribution of training data and the use of explicit spatial information. Comput Geosci 2014;63, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.10.008
Alavi A, Gandomi A, Lary D. Progress of machine learning in geosciences: Preface. Geosci Front. 2016;7:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2015.10.006.
Aftab S, Ahmad M, Hameed, N., Bashir, S., Ali, I., Nawaz, Z.: Rainfall prediction using data mining techniques: A systematic literature review. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 2018; 9(5), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2018.090518
Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P., Chau, K.-w.: Flood prediction using machine learning models: Literature review. Water 10(11), 1536 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111536
Parmar, A., Mistree, K., Sompura, M.: Machine learning techniques for rainfall prediction: A review. In: 2017 International Conference on Innovations in Information Embedded and Communication Systems (2017)
Karpatne A, Atluri G, Faghmous JH, Steinbach M, Banerjee A, Ganguly A, Shekhar S, Samatova N, Kumar V. Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2017;29(10):2318–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2017.2720168.
Olsen, R., Rogers, D., Hodge, D.: The \(ar^{b}\) relation in the calculation of rain attenuation. TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION 26(2), 318–329 (1978). 0018-926X/78/0300-0318
Messer H, Zinevich A, Alpert P. Environmental monitoring by wireless communication networks. Science. 2006;312(5774):713–26. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1120034.
Leijnse, H.: Hydrometeorological application of microwave links. measurement of evaporation and precipitation. PhD thesis, Wageningen University (2007)
Zinevich A, Alpert P, Messer H. Estimation of rainfall fields using commercial microwave communication networks of variable density. Adv Water Resour. 2008;31(11):1470–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.03.003.
Zinevich A, Messer H, Alpert P. Frontal rainfall observation by a commercial microwave communication network. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology - J APPL METEOROL CLIMATOL. 2009;48(7):1317–34. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC2014.1.
Goldshtein O, Messer H, Zinevich A. Rain rate estimation using measurements from commercial telecommunications links. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2009;57(4):1616–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2009.2012554.
Overeem, A., Leijnse, H., Uijlenhoet, R.: Measuring urban rainfall using microwave links from commercial cellular communication networks. Water Resources Research 47(12) (2011). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010350
Hoedjes J, Kooiman A, Maathuis B, Said M, Becht R, Limo A, Mumo M, Nduhiu-Mathenge J, Shaka A, Su B. A conceptual flash flood early warning system for africa, based on terrestrial microwave links and flash flood guidance. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 2014;3(2):584–98. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi3020584.
Doumania A, Gosset M, Cazenave F, Kacou M, Zougmore F. Rainfall monitoring based on microwave links from cellular telecommunication networks:first results from a west african test bed. Geophys Res Lett. 2014;41(16):6016–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060724.
Overeem A, Leijnse H, Uijlenhoet R. Retrieval algorithm for rainfall mapping from microwave links in a cellular communication network. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions. 2015;8:8191–230. https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-8-8191-2015.
Liberman Y, Samuels R, Alpert P, Messer H. New algorithm for integration between wireless microwave sensor network and radar for improved rainfall measurement and mapping. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2014;7:3549–63. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3549-2014.
Bianchi B, Leeuwen PJV, Hogan RJ, Berne A. A variational approach to retrieve rain rate by combining information from rain gauges, radars, and microwave links. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2013;14(6):1897–909. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-094.1.
Bianchi B, Leeuwen PJV, Hogan RJ, Berne A. A variational approach to retrieve rain rate by combining information from rain gauges, radars, and microwave links. American Meteorological Society. 2013;14(6):1897–909. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-094.1.
Bianchi B, Rieckermann J, Berne A. Quality control of rain gauge measurements using telecommunication microwave links. J Hydrol. 2013;492:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.042.
Fencl M, Dohnal M, Rieckermann J, Bareš V. Gauge-adjusted rainfall estimates from commercial microwave links. Hydrology Earth System Science. 2017;21(1):617–34. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-617-2017.
Schleiss M, Berne A. Identification of dry and rainy periods using telecommunication microwave links. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2010;7(3):611–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2010.2043052.
Van het Schip T, Overeem A, Leijnse H, Uijlenhoet R, Meirink J, van Delden A. Rainfall measurement using cell phone links: classification of wet and dry periods using geostationary satellites. Hydrol Sci J. 2017;62(9):1343–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1329588.
Leijnse, H., Uijlenhoet, R., Stricker, J.N.M.: Hydrometeorological application of a microwave link: 2. precipitation. Water Resources Research 43(4) (2007). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004989
Graf M, Chwala C, Polz J, Kunstmann H. Rainfall estimation from a german-wide commercial microwave link network: optimized processing and validation for 1 year of data. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2020;24(6):2931–50. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2931-2020.
Chwala, C., Kunstmann, H., Hipp, S., Siart, U., Eibert, T.: Precipitation observation using commercial microwave communication links. In: 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, pp. 2922–2925 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6350714. IEEE
Rayitsfeld A, Samuels R, Zinevich A, Hadar U, Alpert P. Comparison of two methodologies for long term rainfall monitoring using a commercial microwave communication system. Atmos Res. 2012;19(104–105):119–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.08.011.
Wang Z, Schleiss M, Jaffrain J, Berne A, Rieckermann J. Using markov switching models to infer dry and rainy periods from telecommunication microwave link signals. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2012;5(7):1847–59. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1847-2012.
Reller, C., Loeliger, H., Marín Díaz, J.P.: A model for quasi-periodic signals with application to rain estimation from microwave link gain. In: 2011 19th European Signal Processing Conference, pp. 971–975 (2011). IEEE
Diba FD, Samad MA, Ghimire J, Choi D-Y. Wireless telecommunication links for rainfall monitoring: Deep learning approach and experimental results. IEEE Access. 2021;9:66769–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3076781.
Habi, H.V., Messer, H.: Wet-dry classification using lstm and commercial microwave links. In: 2018 IEEE 10th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), pp. 149–153 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/SAM.2018.8448679
Polz J, Chwala C, Graf M, Kunstmann H. Rain event detection in commercial microwave link attenuation data using convolutional neural networks. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2020;13(7):3835–53. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3835-2020.
Shalev-Shwartz, S., Ben-David, S.: Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms. Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, University Printing House Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS, UK (2014)
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning nature. 2015;521(7553):436–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539.
Pudashine J, Guyot A, Petitjean F, Pauwels VR, Uijlenhoet R, Seed A, Prakash M, Walker JP. Deep learning for an improved prediction of rainfall retrievals from commercial microwave links. Water Resour Res. 2020;56(7):2019–026255. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026255.
Overeem, A.: Commercial microwave link data for rainfall monitoring. 4TU.ResearchData. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.4121/uuid:323587ea-82b7-4cff-b123-c660424345e5 (2019)
Rios Gaona M, Overeem A, Leijnse H, Uijlenhoet R. Measurement and interpolation uncertainties in rainfall maps from cellular communication networks. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2015;19(8):3571–84.
Overeem A, Leijnse H, Uijlenhoet R. Two and a half years of country-wide rainfall maps using radio links from commercial cellular telecommunication networks. Water Resour Res. 2016;52(10):8039–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019412.
Imhoff R, Overeem A, Brauer C, Leijnse H, Weerts A, Uijlenhoet R. Rainfall nowcasting using commercial microwave links. Geophys Res Lett. 2020;47(19):2020–089365.
Sohail Afzal, M., Shah, S.H.H., Cheema, M.J.M., Ahmad, R.: Real time rainfall estimation using microwave signals of cellular communication networks: a case study of faisalabad, pakistan. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 1–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-740
Kotsiantis SB, Zaharakis I, Pintelas P, et al. Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques. Emerging artificial intelligence applications in computer engineering. 2007;160(1):3–24.
Zounemat-Kermani M, Batelaan O, Fadaee M, Hinkelmann R. Ensemble machine learning paradigms in hydrology: A review. Journal of Hydrology. 2021;598: 126266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126266.
Sani NS, Abd Rahman AH, Adam A, Shlash I, Aliff M. Ensemble learning for rainfall prediction. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2020;11(11):153–62.
Zhang C, Ma Y. Ensemble Machine Learning: Methods and Applications. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2012.
Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., Stone, C.J.: Classification and Regression Trees. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom (1984). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315139470
Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay E. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011;12:2825–30.
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to Aart Overeem and the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) for providing the radar rainfall dataset and microwave link data used in this work. We really appreciated the availability of Aart Overeem for complementary information. We are also very grateful to Dr Marielle Gosset of IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement) for the facilities provided in the course of this work through the SMART and DVD (Douala Ville Durable) projects.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
All the procedures performed in this study are in accordance with the ethical standards of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used in this work are freely available online.
Code availability
The code used to obtain the results in this study is available online.
Author contributions
All the authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Kamtchoum Venceslas Evrad, Armand Nzeukou and Clémentin Tayou. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Kamtchoum Venceslas Evrad and all the authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamtchoum, E.V., Nzeukou Takougang, A.C. & Tayou Djamegni, C. A Machine Learning Approach for the Classification of Wet and Dry Periods Using Commercial Microwave Link Data. SN COMPUT. SCI. 3, 227 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01143-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01143-8