Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-objective PID Controller Tuning for Multi-model Control of Nonlinear Systems

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-model approaches for non-linear control usually consist in partitioning the operating space of a given non-linear process, in such a way, it is possible to approximate a local linear model for each partition. That allows using standard control and tuning techniques for each local linear model. After that, a global controller merging the set of local controllers is defined to control the original non-linear process. This global controller merges the local controllers, given that a single controller will exhibit different trade-offs in its performance in different operating regions; therefore, a single controller could exhibit a deficient performance in the overall operating space. In this paper, we exploit this fact from a multi-objective optimisation point of view, to tune a single controller using a parametric multi-model, looking for a suitable controller with a preferable trade-off along with the overall operating space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A maximisation problem can be converted to a minimisation problem. For each of the objectives that have to be maximised, the transformation: \(\max J_i({\varvec{x}}) = -\min (-J_i({\varvec{x}}))\) could be applied.

  2. Available at: https://es.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/65145.

References

  1. Ali MMA, et al. Multi-objective Lyapunov-based controller design for nonlinear systems via genetic programming. Neural Comput Appl. 2021;34(2):1345–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Åström KJ, Hägglund T. Revisiting the Ziegler–Nichols step response method for pid control. J Process Control. 2004;14(6):635–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Böling JM, Seborg DE, Hespanha JP. Multi-model adaptive control of a simulated ph neutralization process. Control Eng Pract. 2007;15:663–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carrau JV, Reynoso-Meza G, García-Nieto S, Blasco X. Enhancing controllerś tuning reliability with multi-objective optimisation: from model in the loop to hardware in the loop. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2017;64:52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coello CAC, Lamont GB. Applications of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, vol. 1. Singapore: World Scientific; 2004.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Das S, Suganthan PN. Differential evolution: a survey of the state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2010;15:4–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Du J, Johansen TA. Integrated multimodel control of nonlinear systems based on gap metric and stability margin. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53:10206–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Du J, Johansen TA. Control-relevant nonlinearity measure and integrated multi-model control. J Process Control. 2017;57:127–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Du J, Song C, Li P. Application of gap metric to model bank determination in multilinear model approach. J Process Control. 2009;19:231–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Du J, Song C, Yao Y, Li P. Multilinear model decomposition of mimo nonlinear systems and its implication for multilinear model-based control. J Process Control. 2013;23:271–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Falcón-Cardona JG, Coello CAC. Indicator-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: a comprehensive survey. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR). 2020;53(2):1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Galán O, Romagnoli JA, Palazoglu A. Robust h\(\infty\) control of nonlinear plants based on multi-linear models: an application to a bench-scale ph neutralization reactor. Chem Eng Sci. 2000;55:4435–50.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Galan O, Romagnoli JA, Palazoglu A. Real-time implementation of multi-linear model-based control strategies–an application to a bench-scale ph neutralization reactor. J Process Control. 2004;14:571–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Galán O, Romagnoli JA, Palazoglu A, Arkun Y. Gap metric concept and implications for multilinear model-based controller design. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2003;42:2189–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Galán O, Romagnoli JA, Palazoğlu A, Arkun Y. Experimental verification of gap metric as a tool for model selection in multi-linear model-based control. IFAC Proc Volumes. 2004;37:257–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garpinger O, Hägglund T, Åström KJ. Performance and robustness trade-offs in PID control. J Process Control. 2014;24:568–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ge M, Chiu MS, Wang QG. Robust pid controller design via lmi approach. J Process Control. 2002;12:3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hlava J, Hubka L, Tuma L. Multi model predictive control of a power plant heat exchanger network based on gap metric. In: booktitle2012 16th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC); 2012. p. 1–6.

  19. Hosseini S, Fatehi A, Johansen TA, Sedigh AK. Multiple model bank selection based on nonlinearity measure and h-gap metric. J Process Control. 2012;22:1732–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu H, Xu L, Goodman ED, Zeng S. Nsga-ii-based nonlinear pid controller tuning of greenhouse climate for reducing costs and improving performances. Neural Comput Appl. 2014;24:927–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeyasenthil R, Nataraj P. A multiple model gap-metric based approach to nonlinear quantitative feedback theory. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2016;49:160–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marques T, Reynoso-Meza G. Applications of multi-objective optimisation for pid-like controller tuning: a 2015–2019 review and analysis. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2020;53:7933–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meza GR, Ferragud XB, Saez JS, Durá JMH. Controller Tuning with evolutionary multiobjective optimization: a holistic multiobjective optimization design procedure, vol. 85. Berlin: Springer; 2016.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Miettinen K. Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. In: International series in operations research and management science, vol. 12. Springer, New York, NY, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5563-6

  25. Murray-Smith R, Johansen T. Multiple model approaches to nonlinear modelling and control. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Perez J, Odloak D, Lima E. Multi-model mpc with output feedback. Braz J Chem Eng. 2014;31:131–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pourbabaee B, Meskin N, Khorasani K. Sensor fault detection, isolation, and identification using multiple-model-based hybrid Kalman filter for gas turbine engines. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2016;24:1184–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Puschke J, Zubov A, Kosek J, Mitsos A. Multi-model approach based on parametric sensitivities - a heuristic approximation for dynamic optimization of semi-batch processes with parametric uncertainties. Comput Chem Eng. 2017;98:161–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Reynoso-Meza G. Extended multi-objective differential evolution with spherical pruning, ¡ spmodex ¿ algorithm. 2018. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/65145. Accessed 1 Dec 2021

  30. Reynoso-Meza G, Sanchis J, Blasco X, García-Nieto S. Physical programming for preference driven evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Appl Soft Comput. 2014;24:341–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Reynoso-Meza G, Sanchis J, Blasco X, Martínez M. Controller tuning using evolutionary multi-objective optimisation: current trends and applications. Control Eng Pract. 2014;28:58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rodríguez-Molina A, Mezura-Montes E, Villarreal-Cervantes MG, Aldape-Pérez M. Multi-objective meta-heuristic optimization in intelligent control: a survey on the controller tuning problem. Appl Soft Comput. 2020;93: 106342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sánchez HS, Padula F, Visioli A, Vilanova R. Tuning rules for robust fopid controllers based on multi-objective optimization with fopdt models. ISA Trans. 2017;66:344–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shaghaghi D, Fatehi A, Khaki-Sedigh A. Multi-linear model set design based on the nonlinearity measure and h-gap metric. ISA Trans. 2017;68:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tan GT, Chiu MS. A multiple-model approach to decentralized internal model control design. Chem Eng Sci. 2001;56:6651–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Toscano R. A simple robust pi/pid controller design via numerical optimization approach. J Process Control. 2005;15:81–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vinnicombe G. Frequency domain uncertainty and the graph topology. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1993;38:1371–83.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang Q, Li H. Moea/d: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2007;11(6):712–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zitzler E, Thiele L, Laumanns M, Fonseca CM, Da Fonseca VG. Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2003;7(2):117–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zribi A, Chtourou M, Djemel M. Multiple model reduction approach using gap metric and stability margin for control nonlinear systems. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2017;15:267–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and the Fundação Araucária (FAPPR)—Brazil—Finance Codes: 310079/2019-5-PQ2, 4408164/2021-2-Univ and 51432/2018-PPP.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Gilberto Reynoso-Meza, Jesús Carrillo-Ahumada, Victor Henrique Alves Ribeiro and Tainara Marques contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. PPGEPS, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Imaculada Conceição 1155, Curitiba, PR, 80215-901, Brazil

    Gilberto Reynoso-Meza & Tainara Marques

  2. Universidad del Papaloapan, Circuito Central 200, Tuxtepec, 68301, Oaxaca, Mexico

    Jesús Carrillo-Ahumada

  3. Silex, Amazonas Marcondes 448, Curitiba, PR, 80035-230, Brazil

    Victor Henrique Alves Ribeiro

Authors
  1. Gilberto Reynoso-Meza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jesús Carrillo-Ahumada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Victor Henrique Alves Ribeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tainara Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilberto Reynoso-Meza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reynoso-Meza, G., Carrillo-Ahumada, J., Alves Ribeiro, V.H. et al. Multi-objective PID Controller Tuning for Multi-model Control of Nonlinear Systems. SN COMPUT. SCI. 3, 351 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01236-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01236-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation