Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A SoC-Based Programmable Portable Ultrasound Scanning System for Point-of-Care Applications and Clinical Research Activities

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 14 July 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a programmable SoC-based hardware framework that can be used for developing a complete clinical portable ultrasound scanning (PUS) system for remote healthcare, point-of-care diagnostics and clinical research activities. The system is developed for 16 channel data acquisition and is provided with additional external interfaces like Ethernet, RS-232, HDMI, VGA and USB ports enabling the system for more reliable diagnostics in remote healthcare settings. To reduce the size of the ultrasound scanning system, the front-end signal processing hardware along with the external interfaces are integrated on an eight layered printed circuit board (PCB). The front-end processing, which includes analog signal conditioning and transmit beamforming are implemented on dedicated hardware, while the mid-end and back-end processing algorithms are implemented on the FPGA processor. The controlling and coordination between the entire processing modules are done using an onboard ARM processor. The developed PUS serves three main purposes: (1) it can be used to acquire RF data at different instances of the signal processing modules that can be used for testing new algorithms and developing computer-aided diagnostics, (2) provided with JTAG and UART ports that can be used for testing and debugging the algorithms while up-gradation, and (3) the proposed system can be interfaced with a smart phone to access the scanned data from the ultrasound board for display. The developed PUS have a dimension 235 mm \(\times \) 205 mm and weigh approximately 450 g.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Change history

References

  1. Zynq SoC. [online] https://www.xilinx.com/products/silicon-devices/soc/zynq-7000.html. 2020.

  2. Kang J, Kim P, Yoon C, Yoo Y, Song T-K. Efficient parallel-beamforming based on shared FIFO for ultra-compact ultrasound imaging systems. Access IEEE. 2020;8:80490–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Y, Demosthenous A. Integrated circuits for medical ultrasound applications: imaging and beyond. IEEE Trans Biomed Circ Syst. 2021;15:838–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoon C, Kim HH, Kirk Shung K. Development of a low-complexity, cost-effective digital beamformer architecture for high-frequency ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2017;64(6):1002–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ranganathan K, Santy MK, Blalock TN, Hossack JA, Walker WF. Direct sampled I/Q beamforming for compact and very low-cost ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004;51(9):1082–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Asl BM, Mahloojifar A. A low-complexity adaptive beamformer for ultrasound imaging using structured covariance matrix. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012;59:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dusa C, Rajalakshmi P, Puli S, Desai UB, Merchant SN. Low complex, programmable FPGA based 8-channel ultrasound transmitter for medical imaging researches. In: e-Health networking, applications and services (Healthcom), 2014 IEEE 16th international conference on pp 252–256. 2014.

  8. Karaman M, Li P-C, O’Donnell M. Synthetic aperture imaging for small scale systems. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1995;42(3):429–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bharath R, Kumar P, Dusa C, Akkala V, Puli S, Ponduri H, Divya Krishna K, et al. FPGA-based portable ultrasound scanning system with automatic kidney detection. J Imaging. 2015;1(1):193–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deylami AM, Asl BM. Low complex subspace minimum variance beamformer for medical ultrasound imaging. Ultrasonics. 2016;66:43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Asl BM, Deylami AM. A low complexity minimum variance beamformer for ultrasound imaging using dominant mode rejection. Ultrasonics. 2018;2018:4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kang J, Yoon C, Lee J, Kye S-B, Lee Y, Chang JH, Kim G-D, Yoo Y, Song T. A system-on-chip solution for point-of-care ultrasound imaging systems: architecture and ASIC implementation. IEEE Trans Biomed Circ Syst. 2016;10(2):412–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tang H-Y, Seo D, Singhal U, Li X, Maharbiz MM, Alon E, Boser BE. Miniaturizing ultrasonic system for portable health care and fitness. IEEE Trans Biomed Circ Syst. 2015;9(6):767–76.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gi-Duck K, Changhan Y, Sang-Bum K, Youngbae L, Jeeun K, Yangmo Y, Tai-Kyong S. A single FPGA-based portable ultrasound imaging system for point-of-care applications. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012;59:7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stawicki SP, Paul BD. Modern sonology and the bedside practitioner: evolution of ultrasound from curious novelty to essential clinical tool. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015;2015:457–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stawicki SP, et al. Portable ultrasonography in mass casualty incidents: the CAVEAT examination. World J Orthopedics. 2010;11:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(8):749–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nelson BP, Chason K. Use of ultrasound by emergency medical services: a review. Int J Emerg Med. 2008;1(4):253–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schneider FK, Agarwal A, Yoo YM, Fukuoka T, Kim Y. A fully programmable computing architecture for medical ultrasound machines. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2010;14(2):538–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim Y, Kim JH, Basoglu C, Winter TC. Programmable ultrasound imaging using multimedia technologies: a next-generation ultrasound machine. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 1997;1(1):19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shamdasani V, Managuli R, Sikdar S, Kim Y. Ultrasound color-flow imaging on a programmable system. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2004;8(2):191–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goceri E, Shah ZK, Layman R, Jiang X, Gurcan MN. Quantification of liver fat: a comprehensive review. Comput Biol Med. 2016;71:174–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bharti P, Mittal D, Ananthasivan R. Computer-aided characterization and diagnosis of diffuse liver diseases based on ultrasound imaging: a review. Ultrason Imaging. 2017;39(1):33–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liao Y-Y, Yang K-C, Lee M-J, Huang K-C, Chen J-D, Yeh C-K. Multifeature analysis of an ultrasound quantitative diagnostic index for classifying nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci Rep. 2016;2016:6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Granchi S, Vannacci E, Biagi E, Masotti L. Multidimensional spectral analysis of the ultrasonic radiofrequency signal for characterization of media. Ultrasonics. 2016;68:89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moradi M, Abolmaesumi P, Isotalo PA, Siemens DR, Sauerbrei EE, Mousavi P. Detection of prostate cancer from RF ultrasound echo signals using fractal analysis. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2006. EMBS’06. 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, pp. 2400–2403. 2006.

  27. Wilson T, Zagzebski J, Varghese T, Chen Q, Rao M. The ultrasonix 500RP: a commercial ultrasound research interface. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2006;53:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tortoli P, Bassi L, Boni E, Dallai A, Guidi F, Ricci S. ULA-OP: An advanced open platform for ultrasound research. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009;56(10):2207–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hemmsen MC, Nikolov SI, Pedersen MM, Pihl MJ, Enevoldsen MS, Hansen JM, Jensen JA. Implementation of a versatile research data acquisition system using a commercially available medical ultrasound scanner. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012;59:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheung CCP, Alfred CH, Salimi N, Yiu BYS, Tsang IKH, Kerby B, Zahiri AR, Dickie K. Multi-channel pre-beamformed data acquisition system for research on advanced ultrasound imaging methods. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012;59(2):243–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hoskins PR, Martin K, Thrush A. Diagnostic ultrasound: physics and equipment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Stergiopoulos S. Advanced signal processing handbook: theory and implementation for radar, sonar, and medical imaging real time systems. Hoboken: CRC Press; 2000.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Tomov BG, Jensen JA. Compact FPGA-based beamformer using oversampled 1-bit A/D converters. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005;52(5):870–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Matrone G, Stuart SA, Caliano G, Magenes G. The delay multiply and sum beamforming algorithm in ultrasound B-mode medical imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34(4):940–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schneider FK, Yoo YM, Agarwal A, Koh LM, Kim Y. New demodulation filter in digital phase rotation beamforming. Ultrasonics. 2006;44(3):265–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Agarwal A, Yoo YM, Schneider FK, Gao C, Koh LM, Kim Y. New demodulation method for efficient phase-rotation-based beamforming. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2007;54:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Akkala V, Rajalakshmi P, Kumar P, Desai UB. FPGA based ultrasound backend system with image enhancement technique. In: Biosignals and Biorobotics Conference (2014): biosignals and robotics for better and safer living (BRC), 5th ISSNIP-IEEE; pp. 1–5. 2014.

  38. Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW. Discrete-time signal processing. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Andraka R. A survey of CORDIC algorithms for FPGA based computers. In :Proceedings of the 1998 ACM/SIGDA sixth international symposium on Field programmable gate arrays, pp. 191—200. ACM; 1998.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Mathematics, Defence Institute of Advanced Technology, Girinagar, Pune, 411025, Maharashtra, India

    R. Bharath

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Sangareddy, Hyderabad, 402285, Telangana, India

    D. Santhosh Reddy & P. Rajalakshmi

Authors
  1. R. Bharath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Santhosh Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Rajalakshmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Bharath.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “Innovative AI in Medical Applications” guest edited by Lydia Bouzar-Benlabiod, Stuart H. Rubin and Edwige Pissaloux.

The original online version of this article was revised due to incorrect affiliation of the author P. Rajalakshmi. Now, it has been corrected.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bharath, R., Santhosh Reddy, D. & Rajalakshmi, P. A SoC-Based Programmable Portable Ultrasound Scanning System for Point-of-Care Applications and Clinical Research Activities. SN COMPUT. SCI. 3, 349 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01241-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01241-7

Keywords