Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The Effectiveness of a Blended Learning-Based Life Design Course: Implications of Instruction and Application of Technology

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021 in Taiwan, we have adapted the face-to-face Life Design course to a blended learning approach with educational technology to cope with the problem of cross-generational confusion and anxiety towards later life from learners.

The objectives of this study are to.

  1. 1.

    evaluate learners’ reactions after attending the Life Design course including their level of satisfaction, engagement (Level 1), and the applicability of courses in their life.

  2. 2.

    evaluate their learning outcomes after attending the Life Design course, such as their acquisition of knowledge, skills, attitudes, confidence, commitment (Level 2), and behavioral changes (Level 3).

  3. 3.

    explore the factors that enable and prevent students from transferring their learning in this course to the action taking and making behavioral changes.

  4. 4.

    explore how the application of educational technology can enhance the teaching and learning in the Life Design course.

Methods

This study used an action research method to solve two main problems we identified in practice: students’ confusion about their future life and the shortcomings of traditional teaching methods, which cannot meet the learning needs of this type of course due to the requirement of intensive personal reflection and self-disclosure. Participants were 36 master’s students who completed the Life Design course. Based on this course's design, implementation, and evaluation, we used the new Kirkpatrick Learning Assessment Model (Kirkpatrick J, Kirkpatrick WK. An introduction to the new world Kirkpatrick Model. Kirkpatrick Partners, 2021) to analyze the learning effectiveness on the Reaction, Learning, and Behavioral levels.

Results

To facilitate learners to overcome the cross-generational confusion of their life design and solve the shortage of face-to-face teaching methods, we took biographical learning as the core theme for this Life Design course and designed online and offline learning activities. The blended learning approach with educational technology allowed us to go beyond time and location constraints and provide a holistic and inseparable learning experience in both formats. The result of the evaluation shows that students who took the Life Design course were highly satisfied with the overall course design, topics, and the suitability of a blended learning approach, which motivated them to extend their learning outside the classroom and helped them benefit from a more trusted, personal and hybrid interaction with teachers and their peers both online and offline. On the learning level, students not only learned the correct knowledge of age perspectives, changed their views of career and personal development, and acquired skills for life design, but were also confident and committed to applying what they have learned in their future life. After the course, many students applied and integrated the learning into behavioral changes in their life. In terms of the difficulties and hindrances encountered in action taking, many students mentioned the lack of peers’ support and constraints from their busy daily life. Many suggested providing extra support after the course with regular impulse, follow-ups, and individual feedback from teachers and peers in an online learning community. This indicates how educational technology can better support these elements in continuous learning and the transfer of learning.

Conclusion

Based on these results, we affirm that implementing this Life Design course with a blended learning approach is indeed better than a fully physical course. However, the focus of a blended learning approach should be on learners from a pedagogical perspective rather than technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Albiladi WS, Alshareef KK. Blended learning in English teaching and learning: a review of the current literature. J Lang Teach Res. 2019;10(2):232–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alheit P. Biographieorientierung und Bildungstheorie. Müssen wir "Leben" lernen? In: Forschungsinstitut für Arbeiterbildung (Hrsg.): Jahrbuch Arbeit, Bildung, Kultur. (10). Recklinghausen, 1992;S. 4–47.

  3. Ali MN. Elderly acceptance using mobile web base application in blended learning environment. https://doi.org/10.13140/Rg.2.2.14790.80962/1. 2021.

  4. Alsaadat K. The impact of social media technologies on adult learning. Int J Electr Comput Eng (IJECE). 2018;8(5):3747–3755.

  5. Alsalamah A, Callinan C. The Kirkpatrick model for training evaluation: bibliometric analysis after 60 years (1959–2020). Ind Commer Train. 2022;54(1):36–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-12-2020-0115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Biesta G, Tedder M. Agency and learning in the life course: Towards an ecological perspective. Stud Educ Adults Spec Issue 2007;39(2):132.

  7. Braun S. Biographisches Lernen als Methode in der Erwachsenenbildung. In: Faulstich-Wieland HN, Siebert H, Weinberg J (eds) Biographieforschung Literatur- und Forschungsreport Weiterbildung (37), S. 1996, 109–115.

  8. Chang JS. Dictionary of education—blended learning. https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678942/; 2012.

  9. Chung PJ. A first look at the new version of the Koch learning assessment model. Assess Bimon. 2017;68:34–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dausien B, Alheit P. Biographieorientierung und Didaktik: Überlegungen zur Begleitung biographischen Lernens in der Erwachsenenbildung. report: Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung 2005;28(3):S.27–36.

  11. Engle M. Little old ladies are much maligned: Diversity reconsidered. Educ Gerontol. 1990;16(4):339–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eryilmaz, M. The effectiveness of blended learning environments. Contemporary Issues Educ Res (CIER). 2015;8(4):251–56. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v8i4.9433.

  13. Geraldine Torrisi-Steele & Steve Drew. The literature landscape of blended learning in higher education: the need for better understanding of academic blended practice. Int J Acad Dev. 2013;18(4):371–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.786720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kade S. Individualisierung und Älterwerden / hrsg. von Sylvia Kade. Bad Heilbrunn: Bad Heilbrunn : Klinkhardt; 1994.

  15. Kade S. Altersbildung. Lebenssituation und Lernbedarf (2. Aufl. Frankfurt am Main: DIE, Deutsches Institut für Erwachsenenbildung, Pädagogische Arbeitsstelle des Deutschen Volksschul- Verbandes; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kan HJ. Education dictionary—action research in teaching. https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1310217/. 2000.

  17. Kirkpatrick J, Kirkpatrick WK. An introduction to the new world Kirkpatrick Model. Kirkpatrick Partners, LLC; 2021.

  18. Kirkpatrick JD, Kirkpatrick WK. Kirkpatrick's four levels of training evaluation. Association for Talent Development. 2016.

  19. Kokol P, Stiglic G, “PRIMER ICT: A new blended learning paradigm for teaching ICT skills to older people,”,. 24th international symposium on computer-based medical systems (CBMS). Bristol, UK. 2011;2011:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2011.5999119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li A, Wei H. Adult and lifelong education in the context of 100 years of life: new directions for adult education research in a changing society. J Adult Lifelong Educ. 2019;32:65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang F, Hu R, Li Y, Yan W. The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(1): e4807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McNiff J. Action research: Principles and practice. London: Routledge; 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Baki M. The effectiveness of online and blended learning: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teach Coll Rec. 2013;115(3):1–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. National Development Council. Population projections for the Republic of China (2020–2070). Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/308umph. 2020.

  25. Oishi LN. Enhancing career development agency in emerging adulthood: an intervention using design thinking. Doctoral dissertation. Graduate School of Education, Stanford University. 2012.

  26. Poulova P, Simonova I. Blended learning as means of support within the elderly people education. In: Cheung S, Kwok LF, Ma W, Lee LK, Yang H (eds) Blended learning. New challenges and innovative practices. ICBL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10309. Springer, Cham. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59360-9_1.

  27. Raspopovic M, Cvetanovic S, Medan I, Ljubojevic D. The effects of integrating social learning environment with online learning. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2017;18(1):142–60.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Reilly TS. Designing Life: Studies of emerging adults development. doctoral dissertation. Graduate School of Education, Stanford University. 2013.

  29. Renner D, Laumer S, Weitzel T. Effectiveness and efficiency of blended learning—A literature review. 2014.

  30. Salmon G, Ross B, Pechenkina E, Chase A-M. The space for social media in structured online learning. Res Learn Technol. 2015;23. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.28507.

  31. Shi MY. Challenges and design of blended learning. Bimon Rev. 2014;50:34–6.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wei H, Wang M. Leling’s happiness lesson: Designing the second half of your life. Taipei: Four Pieces of Jade Cultural and Creative. 2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Adult and Continuing Education, Aging and Education Research Center, Center for Innovative Research On Aging Society, National Chung Cheng University, 168, University Road, Ming Hsiung, Chia-Yi, 621, Taiwan

    Hui-Chuan Wei

  2. Adult Education, Department of Adult and Continuing Education, National Chung Cheng University, Chia-Yi, Taiwan

    Yi-Hsuan Lin

  3. Adult Education and Lifelong Learning, Institute of Educational Sciences, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Li-Hsien Chang

Authors
  1. Hui-Chuan Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi-Hsuan Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li-Hsien Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Hsien Chang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors must disclose financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “Open and Innovative Learning with Technology 2022” guest edited by Billy Tak-ming Wong, Jiyou Jia, Pedro Isaias and Maximus Gorky Sembiring.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, HC., Lin, YH. & Chang, LH. The Effectiveness of a Blended Learning-Based Life Design Course: Implications of Instruction and Application of Technology. SN COMPUT. SCI. 4, 360 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-01730-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-01730-3

Keywords