Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ensemble Feature Extraction with Classification Integrated with Mask RCNN Architecture in Breast Cancer Detection Based on Deep Learning Techniques

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among several cancer types, most common cancer is breast cancer diagnosed in women and automatic classification of breast cancer images is a crucial task using computer-aided analysis. From the statistical analysis, it is observed that the rate of breast cancer is nearly 12% of all cancer types worldwide. Moreover, around 25% of women are affected with breast cancer. Hence, there is a high demand for rapid and appropriate analysis of breast cancer images. In the current situation, DL approaches are mostly preferred for this purpose. The most important concept to choose deep learning method for diagnosis of breast cancer medical images is that more accurate results can be quickly obtained compared to other conventional machine learning techniques. This research work comes up with an innovative deep learning move toward based on (CNN) integrated with encoder and UNet. Improved performance measure and classification accuracy rate was obtained for the proposed DT-KNN 5, RF-KNN 5, DT-KNN 6, RF-KNN 6 models. The overall structure of the EfficientNet model is an endurable architecture constructed with attention components. Every image is processed one by one with the use of augmentation methods before transferring it as an input to the EfficientNet model. With constant number of images and every image features are modified with augmentation methods like shift, flip, rotation, and brightness using ensemble classifiers such as K-Means Nearest Neighbor, Random Forest, and Decision Tree. This proposed model has produced better success rate than EfficientNet-B3, ResNet50, and DenseNet121 models for the same dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data are available in the manuscript. The experimental dataset description is explained in detail.

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schreer I. Dense breast tissue as an important risk factor for breast cancer and implications for early detection. Breast Care. 2009;4:89–92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000211954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kerlikowske K, Carney PA, Geller B, Mandelson MT, Taplin SH, Malvin K, Ernster V, Urban N, Cutter G, Rosenberg R, Ballard-Barbash R. Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:855–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521:436–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. LeCun Y, Kavukcuoglu K, Farabet C. Convolutional networks and applications in vision. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems, 2010. pp. 253–256. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2010.5537907

  6. Rahim R, Murugan S, Mostafa RR, Dubey AK, Regin R, Kulkarni V, Dhanalakshmi KS. Detecting the phishing attack using collaborative approach and secure login through dynamic virtual passwords. Webology. 2020;17(2):524–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heath M, Bowyer K, Kopans D, Moore R, Kegelmeyer WP. The digital database for screening mammography. In: Proceedings of 5th international workshop on digital mammography, Medical Physics Publishing, 2000. pp. 212–218

  8. Peng W, Mayorga RV, Hussein EMA. An automated confirmatory system for analysis of mammograms. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016;125:134–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Srivastava N, Hinton GE, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res. 2014;15:1929–58.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee RS, Gimenez F, Hoogi A, Miyake KK, Gorovoy M, Rubin DL. A curated mammography data set for use in computer-aided detection and diagnosis research. Sci Data. 2017;4:170177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin A-M, Weber BL. Genetic and hormonal risk factors in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(14):1126–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdel-Zaher AM, Eldeib AM. Breast cancer classification using deep belief networks. Expert Syst Appl. 2016;46:139–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun W, (Bill) Tseng TL, Zhang J, Qian W. Enhancing deep convolutional neural network scheme for breast cancer diagnosis with unlabeled data. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2017;57:4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Desai M, Shah M. An anatomization on breast cancer detection and diagnosis employing multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLP) and convolutional neural network (CNN). Clin eHealth. 2020;1:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sun W, Tseng TLB, Zhang J, Qian W. Enhancing deep convolutional neural network scheme for breast cancer diagnosis with unlabeled data. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2017;57:4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fogel DB, Wasson EC III, Boughton EM. Evolving neural networks for detecting breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015;96(1):49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Z, Liu C, Cheng D, Wang L, Yang X, Cheng KT. Automated detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in mp-MRI images based on an end-to-end deep neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018;37(5):1127–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Y, Lei B, Elazab A, Tan EL, Wang W, Huang F, et al. Breast cancer image classification via multi-network features and dual-network orthogonal low-rank learning. IEEE Access. 2020;8:27779–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang P, Hu X, Li Y, Liu Q, Zhu X. Automatic cell nuclei segmentation and classification of breast cancer histopathology images. Signal Process. 2016;122:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016. pp. 770–778.

  21. Zheng Y, Jiang Z, Zhang H, Xie F, Ma Y, Shi H, Zhao Y. Histopathological whole slide image analysis using context-based CBIR. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2018;37(7):1641–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sudharshan PJ, Petitjean C, Spanhol F, Oliveira LE, Heutte L, Honeine P. Multiple instance learning for histopathological breast cancer image classification. Expert Syst Appl. 2019;117:103–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prasath Alias Surendhar S, Vasuki R. Breast cancer detection using mark RCNN segmentation and ensemble classification with feature extraction. Indian J Comput Sci Eng. 2021;12(1):239–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Prasath Alias Surendhar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest to declare. On behalf of all co-authors, the corresponding Author shall bear full responsibility for the submission.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “Industrial IoT and Cyber-Physical Systems” guest edited by Arun K Somani, Seeram Ramakrishnan, Anil Chaudhary and Mehul Mahrishi.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prasath Alias Surendhar, S., Kanna, R.K. & Indumathi, R. Ensemble Feature Extraction with Classification Integrated with Mask RCNN Architecture in Breast Cancer Detection Based on Deep Learning Techniques. SN COMPUT. SCI. 4, 618 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-01893-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-01893-z

Keywords

Navigation