Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transmission-Efficient Grid-Based Synchronized Model for Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Bayesian Compressive Sensing

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of compressed sensing in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) involves the existence of only a small number of compressible signals that possess adequate information for the retrieval of the initial sensed data. While compressed sensing (CS) has been recognized as a valuable framework for enhancing the performance of wireless sensor networks (WSNs), further enhancements are still required to improve the effectiveness of data aggregation at the sink node. This work presents a framework named grid-based synchronized routing using Bayesian compressive sensing (GSR-BCS) for the purpose of enhancing transmission efficiency. The field of grid-based synchronized routing investigates the correlation between various forms of sensed data, such as pressure, fluid, and temperature, within a network. In addition, it explores the impact of different grid sizes on this relationship. The identification of an ideal grid size based on sensed data plays a crucial role in enhancing transmission efficiency in terms of data size or transmission rate. This, in turn, leads to an extension of the lifespan of the network. The application of grid-based synchronized route Bayesian compressive sensing is utilized to achieve efficient data aggregation at the sink. The primary objective is to enhance the data aggregation rate, also known as accuracy, by mitigating ambiguity through the implementation of Bayesian compressed data aggregation. In this work, the Bayesian compressive grid approximation method is introduced as a promising approach for reducing the number of transmissions and minimizing transmission time. Simulations are additionally performed to corroborate the theoretical findings across several scenarios utilizing the MATLAB/SIMULINK software. Based on the simulated results produced, it can be observed that the suggested framework exhibits a noteworthy enhancement in transmission efficiency across diverse scenarios, as evidenced by improvements in data size, accuracy, and transmission time. Upon experimental analysis, it has been determined that the GSR-BCS framework has the capability to enhance data aggregation accuracy by 16.93% and extend network lifetime by 22.9% when compared to existing state-of-the-art methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data samples have been reasonably requested.

Code Availability

The relevant code with the manuscript is also available and would be available, if will be asked to do so later.

References

  1. Kirubasri G, Sankar S, Pandey D, Pandey BK, Nassa VK, Dadheech P. Software-defined networking-based Ad hoc networks routing protocols. In: Software defined networking for Ad Hoc networks. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 95–123.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Muniandi B et al (2019) A 97% maximum efficiency fully automated control turbo boost topology for battery chargers. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I: Regul Pap 66(11):4516–4527. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2019.2925374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pal V, Singh G, Yadav RP, Pal P. Energy efficient clustering scheme for wireless sensor networks: a survey. J Wireless Netw Commun. 2012;2(6):168–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Perumal M, Dhandapani S (2015) Modeling and simulation of a novel relay node based secure routing protocol using multiple mobile sink for wireless sensor networks. Sci World J., 2015.

  5. Arroyo-Valles R, Marques AG, Cid-Sueiro J. Optimal selective forwarding for energy saving in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun. 2010;10(1):164–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Banerjee I, Madhumathy P. QoS enhanced energy efficient cluster based routing protocol realized using stochastic modeling to increase lifetime of green wireless sensor network. Wireless Netw. 2023;29(2):489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pandey D, Pandey BK, Wairya S. Hybrid deep neural network with adaptive galactic swarm optimization for text extraction from scene images. Soft Comput. 2021;25:1563–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou X, Ganti RK, Andrews JG. Secure wireless network connectivity with multi-antenna transmission. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun. 2010;10(2):425–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Torabi M, Mohammadi N, Nerguizian C. Performance analysis of an asymmetric two-hop amplify-and-forward relaying RF–FSO system in a cognitive radio with partial relay selection. Opt Commun. 2022;505: 127478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pandey BK, Pandey D. Parametric optimization and prediction of enhanced thermoelectric performance in co-doped CaMnO3 using response surface methodology and neural network. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 2023;34(21):1589.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Devasenapathy D, Kannan K (2015) An energy-efficient cluster-based vehicle detection on road network using intention numeration method. Sci World J. 2015.

  12. Jayapoorani S, Pandey D, Sasirekha NS, Anand R, Pandey BK. Systolic optimized adaptive filter architecture designs for ECG noise cancellation by Vertex-5. Aerospace Syst. 2023;6(1):163–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Subahi AF, Alotaibi Y, Khalaf OI, Ajesh F (2021) Packet drop battling mechanism for energy aware detection in wireless networks. Comput Mater Continua 66(2).

  14. Ruhrup S, Kalosha H, Nayak A, Stojmenovic I. Message-efficient beaconless georouting with guaranteed delivery in wireless sensor, ad hoc, and actuator networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Networking. 2009;18(1):95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dai R, Wang P, Akyildiz IF. Correlation-aware QoS routing with differential coding for wireless video sensor networks. IEEE Trans Multimedia. 2012;14(5):1469–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhorkar A, Naghshvar AA, Javidi MT, Rao BD (2009) An adaptive opportunistic routing scheme for wireless ad-hoc networks. In: 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (pp. 2838–2842). IEEE.

  17. Suma MR, Madhumathy P, Suma MR, Madhumathy P Brakerski‐Gentry‐Vaikuntanathan fully homomorphic encryption cryptography for privacy preserved data access in cloud assisted Internet of Things services using glow‐worm swarm optimization. Trans Emerging Telecommun Technol, 2022; 33(12):e4641

  18. Das S, Barani S, Wagh S, Sonavane SS (2017) Optimal clustering and routing for wireless sensor network based on cuckoo search. International Journal of Advanced Smart Sensor Network Systems (IJASSN), 7(2).

  19. Arfath DY, Kavitha KR. Tour planning for mobile data-gathering mechanisms in wireless sensor networks. Int J Innov Res Comput Commun Eng. 2014;2:2786–91.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lam SS, Qian C. Geographic routing in $ d $-dimensional spaces with guaranteed delivery and low stretch. IEEE/ACM Trans Networking. 2012;21(2):663–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Darby PJD III, Tzeng NF. Decentralized QoS-aware checkpointing arrangement in mobile grid computing. IEEE Trans Mob Comput. 2010;9(8):1173–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Madhumathy P, Pandey D. Deep learning based photo acoustic imaging for non-invasive imaging. Multimedia Tools Appl. 2022;81(5):7501–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamdaoui B, Shin KG. Maximum achievable throughput in multiband multiantenna wireless mesh networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput. 2010;9(6):838–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Najjar-Ghabel S, Farzinvash L, Razavi SN. Mobile sink-based data gathering in wireless sensor networks with obstacles using artificial intelligence algorithms. Ad Hoc Netw. 2020;106: 102243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vinodhini V, Kumar MS, Sankar S, Pandey D, Pandey BK, Nassa VK. IoT-based early forest fire detection using MLP and AROC method. Int J Global Warming. 2022;27(1):55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Anand R, Singh J, Pandey D, Pandey BK, Nassa VK, Pramanik S. Modern technique for interactive communication in LEACH-based ad hoc wireless sensor network. In: Software Defined Networking for Ad Hoc Networks. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 55–73.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Pandey D, Wairya S, Sharma M, Kumar Gupta A, Kakkar R, Kumar Pandey B (2022) An approach for object tracking, categorization, and autopilot guidance for passive homing missiles. Aerospace Syst 5(4): 553–566.

  28. Sengupta R, Sengupta D, Pandey D, Pandey BK, Nassa VK, Dadeech P (2021) A Systematic Review of 5G Opportunities, Architecture and Challenges. Future Trends in 5G and G, 6, 247.

  29. Pandey JK, Jain R, Dilip R, Kumbhkar M, Jaiswal S, Pandey BK, Pandey D (2022) Investigating role of iot in the development of smart application for security enhancement. In: IoT Based Smart Applications (pp. 219–243). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  30. Gupta AK, Sharma R, Pandey D, Nassa VK, Pandey BK, George AS, Dadheech P (2023) Performance analysis of eight-channel WDM optical network with different optical amplifiers for industry 4.0. In; Innovation and Competitiveness in Industry 4.0 Based on Intelligent Systems (pp. 197–212). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  31. Kirubasri G, Sankar S, Pandey D, Pandey BK, Singh H, Anand R (2021) A recent survey on 6G vehicular technology, applications and challenges. In: 2021 9th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  32. Iyyanar P, Anand R, Shanthi T, Nassa VK, Pandey BK, George AS, Pandey D (2023) A real-time smart sewage cleaning UAV assistance system using IoT. In: Handbook of Research on Data-Driven Mathematical Modeling in Smart Cities (pp. 24–39). IGI Global.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express gratitude to Department of Technical Education and Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Landran, Punjab India. The authors would also like to thank to Vice Chancellor, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, and Uttar Pradesh, India

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Florida Gulf Coast University U A Whitaker College of Engineering, Fort Myers, USA

    Deepa Devasenapathy

  2. RV Institute of Technology and Management, Bangalore, India

    P. Madhumathy

  3. Department of ECE, Loyola-ICAM College of Engineering and Technology Loyola, Campus Nungambakkam, Chennai, India

    R. Umamaheshwari

  4. Department of Information Technology, College of Technology, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, U S Nagar, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India

    Binay Kumar Pandey

  5. Department of Technical Education Uttar Pradesh, Kanpur, India

    Digvijay Pandey

Authors
  1. Deepa Devasenapathy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Madhumathy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Umamaheshwari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Binay Kumar Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Digvijay Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Binay Kumar Pandey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have ‘no known conflict of interests or personal relationships’ that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethics Declarations

Not applicable.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable (as the results of studies do not involve any human or animal).

Consent to Participate

Not applicable (as the results of studies do not involve any human or animal).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “Wireless Networks and Mobile Systems” guest edited by Jaime Lloret Mauri and Joel Rodrigues.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Devasenapathy, D., Madhumathy, P., Umamaheshwari, R. et al. Transmission-Efficient Grid-Based Synchronized Model for Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Bayesian Compressive Sensing. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 128 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02410-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02410-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation