Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Automated Classification of Cancer using Heuristic Class Topper Optimization based Naïve Bayes Classifier

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cancer is a complicated illness that is caused by numerous gene mutations or deregulation of gene interactions. This study, on the other hand, proposes a unique method for cancer categorization. Cancer is the major reason of death in this era. Appropriate methods are required to diagnose it as early as possible so that accurate treatment should be started to save human lives. Heuristic Class Topper Optimization describes a vital role in the detection of cancer for classification. A large dataset of tumors has been taken and Naive Bayes classifier exported to categorize them. The Heuristic Class Topper Optimization method (HCTO) is planted to extract the features. The optimization technique is based on the intelligent learning of pupils in a classroom. Weak students are learning from the class topper. There are various class toppers based upon the number of sections. Thus, the characteristics are refined with the aid of HCTO. The HCTO algorithm is a novel artificial intelligence technology that is rapidly converging. The HCTO-NB technique is simple, less complex, accurate, and has a low error rate, all of which are important characteristics in cancer categorization. The recommended method’s achieved parameters are accuracy of 97.6%, precision of 98.4, error rate decreased by 3% on 1000 iterations, and classification efficacy are all demonstrated. The results are also compared to the KNN classifier, which has been used to classify cancer by a number of studies in the past. Experiments on a range of datasets demonstrated that this novel method was more accurate and dependable by ~ 14% compared to KNN. The findings shows that the suggested approach is both rapid and accurate, making it a great alternative for cancer diagnosis in the real world. In this paper 4 types of cancers datasets with relevant features like age, Gender, Tumor size, Tumor area and smoker or non-smoker etc. have been used for real time validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data

The data used to support the study will be made available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Botlagunta M, Botlagunta MD, Myneni MB, et al. Classification and diagnostic prediction of breast cancer metastasis on clinical data using machine learning algorithms. Sci Rep. 2023;13:485. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27548-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Durgadevi P, Vijayalakshmi S, Munish S. Fetal Brain Abnormality Detection through PSO (Particle Swarm Optimization) and Volume Estimation. Ann RSCB, 2021;2700–2714.

  3. Liu J-C, Pan S-N, Zhao H, Wang F, Luo G-H, Lei H, Peng F, Ren Q-P, Chen W, Wu Y-F, Yin L-C. Assessment of structural brain changes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using the MRI-based brain atrophy and lesion index. Neural Regen Res. 2022;17(3):618. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.320996. (Medknow).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lowry KP, Trentham-Dietz A, Schechter CB, Alagoz O, Barlow WE, Burnside ES, Conant EF, Hampton JM, Huang H, Kerlikowske K, Lee SJ, Miglioretti DL, Sprague BL, Tosteson ANA, Yaffe MJ, Stout NK. Long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;112(6):582–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djz184. (Oxford University Press (OUP)).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. George SA. Barriers to breast cancer screening: an integrative review. Health Care Women Int. 2000;21(1):53–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/073993300245401. (Informa UK Limited).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hallquist Viale, RN, MS, CNS, ANP, P. The American Cancer Society’s Facts & Figures: 2020 Edition. In: Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology (Vol. 11, Issue 2). Harborside Press, LLC; 2020. https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2020.11.2.1

  7. Zhou J, Luo L, Dou Q, Chen H, Chen C, Li G, Jiang Z, Heng P. Weakly supervised 3D deep learning for breast cancer classification and localization of the lesions in MR images. J Magn Resonance Imaging. 2019;50(4):1144–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26721. (Wiley).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Soomro BA, Lakhan GR, Mangi S, Shah N. Predicting entrepreneurial intention among business students of public sector universities of Pakistan: an application of the entrepreneurial event model. World J Entrepreneurship Manag Sustain Dev. 2020;16(3):219–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/wjemsd-11-2019-0092. (Emerald).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liang X, Cai Z, Wang M, Zhao X, Chen H, Li C. Chaotic oppositional sine–cosine method for solving global optimization problems. Eng Comput. 2020;38(2):1223–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01083-y. (Springer Science and Business Media LLC).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou W, Wang P, Heidari AA, Wang M, Zhao X, Chen H. Multi-core sine cosine optimization: methods and inclusive analysis. Expert Syst Appl. 2021;164:113974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113974. (Elsevier BV).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tu J, Lin A, Chen H, Li Y, Li C. Predict the entrepreneurial intention of fresh graduate students based on an adaptive support vector machine framework. Math Probl Eng. 2019;2019:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2039872. (Hindawi Limited).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wei Y, Ni N, Liu D, Chen H, Wang M, Li Q, Cui X, Ye H. An improved grey wolf optimization strategy enhanced SVM and its application in predicting the second major. Math Problems Eng. 2017;2017:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y, Liu R, Heidari AA, Wang X, Chen Y, Wang M, Chen H. Towards augmented kernel extreme learning models for bankruptcy prediction: Algorithmic behavior and comprehensive analysis. Neurocomputing. 2021;430:185–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao H, Guo H, Jin X, Shen J, Mao X, Liu J. Parallel and efficient approximate nearest patch matching for image editing applications. Neurocomputing. 2018;305:39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gu N, Fan M, Du L, Ren D. Efficient sequential feature selection based on adaptive eigenspace model. Neurocomputing. 2015;161:199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lotter W, Diab AR, Haslam B, Kim JG, Grisot G, Wu E, Wu K, Onieva JO, Boxerman JL, Wang M, Bandler M, Vijayaraghavan G, Sorensen AG. Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using annotation-efficient deep learning approach (Version 2). arXiv; 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1912.11027

  17. Zhang Q, Yang LT, Chen Z, Li P. A survey on deep learning for big data. Inf Fusion. 2018;42:146–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.10.006. (Elsevier BV).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiss K, Khoshgoftaar TM, Wang D. A survey of transfer learning. J Big Data. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-016-0043-6. (Springer Science and Business Media LLC).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Samala RK, Chan H-P, Hadjiiski LM, Helvie MA, Cha KH, Richter CD. Multi-task transfer learning deep convolutional neural network: application to computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer on mammograms. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62(23):8894–908. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa93d4. (IOP Publishing).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ting FF, Tan YJ, Sim KS. Convolutional neural network improvement for breast cancer classification. Expert Syst Appl. 2019;120:103–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Toğaçar M, Özkurt KB, Ergen B, Cömert Z. BreastNet: a novel convolutional neural network model through histopathological images for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Phys A Stat Mech Appl. 2020;545:123592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.123592. (Elsevier BV).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abbas Q. DeepCAD: a computer-aided diagnosis system for mammographic masses using deep invariant features. Computers. 2016;5(4):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers5040028. (MDPI AG).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sha Z, Hu L, Rouyendegh BD. Deep learning and optimization algorithms for automatic breast cancer detection. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 2020;30(2):495–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22400. (Wiley).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Charan S, Khan MJ, Khurshid K. Breast cancer detection in mammograms using convolutional neural network. In: 2018 international conference on computing, mathematics and engineering technologies (iCoMET). IEEE; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/icomet.2018.8346384

  25. Wahab N, Khan A, Lee YS. Transfer learning based deep CNN for segmentation and detection of mitoses in breast cancer histopathological images. Microscopy. 2019;68(3):216–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmicro/dfz002. (Oxford University Press (OUP)).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lotter W, Diab AR, Haslam B, Kim JG, Grisot G, Wu E, Wu K, Onieva JO, Boyer Y, Boxerman JL, Wang M, Bandler M, Vijayaraghavan GR, Gregory Sorensen A. Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using an annotation-efficient deep learning approach. Nat Med. 2021;27(2):244–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-01174-9. (Springer Science and Business Media LLC).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang F, Liu H, Yu S, Xie Y. Breast mass lesion classification in mammograms by transfer learning. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology. ICBCB ’17: 2017 5th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology. ACM; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3035012.3035022

  28. Khan S, Islam N, Jan Z, Ud Din I, Rodrigues JJPC. A novel deep learning based framework for the detection and classification of breast cancer using transfer learning. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2019;125:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2019.03.022. (Elsevier BV).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cao H, Bernard S, Heutte L, Sabourin R. Improve the performance of transfer learning without fine-tuning using dissimilarity-based multi-view learning for breast cancer histology images. In: Campilho A, Karray F, ter Haar Romeny B (eds) Image Analysis and Recognition. ICIAR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10882. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93000-8_88

  30. Deniz E, Şengür A, Kadiroğlu Z, Guo Y, Bajaj V, Budak Ü. Transfer learning based histopathologic image classification for breast cancer detection. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13755-018-0057-x. (Springer Science and Business Media LLC).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Celik Y, Talo M, Yildirim O, Karabatak M, Acharya UR. Automated invasive ductal carcinoma detection based using deep transfer learning with whole-slide images. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2020;133:32–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2020.03.011. (Elsevier BV).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang X, Chen H, Gan C, Lin H, Dou Q, Tsougenis E, Huang Q, Cai M, Heng P-A. Weakly supervised deep learning for whole slide lung cancer image analysis. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2020;50(9):3950–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2019.2935141. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen Y, Wang Y, Hu F, Feng L, Zhou T, Zheng C. LDNNET: towards robust classification of lung nodule and cancer using lung dense neural network. IEEE Access. 2021;9:50301–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3068896. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang W, Huang J, Chen HN, Elahe MdF, Jin M. A cancer diagnosis method combining miRNA-lncRNA interaction pairs and class weight competition. In IEEE Access. 2020;8:67059–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2985405. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li M, Ma X, Chen C, Yuan Y, Zhang S, Yan Z, Chen C, Chen F, Bai Y, Zhou P, Lv X, Ma M. Research on the auxiliary classification and diagnosis of lung cancer subtypes based on histopathological images. IEEE Access. 2021;9:53687–707. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3071057. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu J, Wu P, Chen Y, Meng Q, Dawood H, Khan MM. A novel deep flexible neural forest model for classification of cancer subtypes based on gene expression data. IEEE Access. 2019;7:22086–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2898723. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun C, Xu A, Liu D, Xiong Z, Zhao F, Ding W. Deep learning-based classification of liver cancer histopathology images using only global labels. In IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020;24(6):1643–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2019.2949837. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Khushi M, Shaukat K, Alam TM, Hameed IA, Uddin S, Luo S, Yang X, Reyes MC. A comparative performance analysis of data resampling methods on imbalance medical data. In IEEE Access. 2021;9:109960–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3102399. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ogino M, Li Z, Shimizu A. Augmented radiology: feature space transfer model for prostate cancer stage prediction. In IEEE Access. 2021;9:102559–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3098038. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen Z, Sun X, Shen L. An effective tumor classification with deep forest and self-training. IEEE Access. 2021;9:100944–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3096241. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Soto-Ayala LC, Cantoral-Ceballos JA. Automatic blood-cell classification via convolutional neural networks and transfer learning. IEEE Latin Am Trans. 2021;19(12):2028–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/tla.2021.9480144. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pham TD. From raw pixels to recurrence image for deep learning of benign and malignant mediastinal lymph nodes on computed tomography. In IEEE Access. 2021;9:96267–78. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3094577. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Haney K, Tandon P, Divi R, Ossandon MR, Baker H, Pearlman PC. The role of affordable, point-of-care technologies for cancer care in low- and middle-income countries: a review and commentary. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2017;5:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/jtehm.2017.2761764. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Islam MT, Tasciotti E, Righetti R. Non-invasive imaging of normalized solid stress in cancers in vivo. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2019;7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/jtehm.2019.2932059. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Saribudak A, Kucharavy H, Hubbard K, Uyar MU. Spatial heterogeneity analysis in evaluation of cell viability and apoptosis for colorectal cancer cells. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2016;4:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/jtehm.2016.2578331. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Masood A, Yang P, Sheng B, Li H, Li P, Qin J, Lanfranchi V, Kim J, Feng DD. Cloud-based automated clinical decision support system for detection and diagnosis of lung cancer in chest CT. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2020;8:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/jtehm.2019.2955458. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Das P, Das DK, Dey S. A new class topper optimization algorithm with an application to data clustering. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/tetc.2018.2812927. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gupta PK, Kumar Das D, Rai A, Srivastava A. Solving economic load dispatch problem using class topper optimization algorithm. In: 2019 innovations in power and advanced computing technologies (i-PACT). IEEE; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/i-pact44901.2019.8960028.

  49. Uddin S, Haque I, Lu H, et al. Comparative performance analysis of K-nearest neighbour (KNN) algorithm and its different variants for disease prediction. Sci Rep. 2022;12:6256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10358-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SCSE, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 203201, India

    Sonia Kukreja & Alok Katiyar

  2. IILM University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 203201, India

    Munish Sabharwal

  3. School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, SR University, Warangal, Telangana, 506371, India

    D. S. Gill

Authors
  1. Sonia Kukreja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Munish Sabharwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alok Katiyar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. S. Gill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors have participated in writing the manuscript and have revised the final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonia Kukreja.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interests. This manuscript has not been submitted to, nor is under review at, another journal or other publishing venue.

Research Involving Human and /or Animals

This article does not contain any studies involving human or animal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “Security for Communication and Computing Application” guest edited by Karan Singh, Ali Ahmadian, Ahmed Mohamed Aziz Ismail, R S Yadav, Md. Akbar Hossain, D. K. Lobiyal, Mohamed Abdel-Basset, Soheil Salahshour, Anura P. Jayasumana, Satya P. Singh, Walid Osamy, Mehdi Salimi and Norazak Senu.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kukreja, S., Sabharwal, M., Katiyar, A. et al. Automated Classification of Cancer using Heuristic Class Topper Optimization based Naïve Bayes Classifier. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 264 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02586-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02586-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation