Abstract
Due to the massive growth in global data traffic, next-generation wireless communication technologies must meet the demands of emerging applications and services by providing enhanced Quality-of-Service (QoS) levels to end-users, by enabling a ubiquitous cellular coverage, characterized by ultra-high reliability and minimal latency. Notably, most cellular network traffic comes from densely populated urban areas, where dense infrastructure and high user demands lead to interference-limited conditions and competition for radio resources, resulting in degraded QoS levels for mobile User Equipment (UE). This work proposed a Quality-of-Experience (QoE)-driven framework for defining UE types according to defined QoS requirements, with application-specific diverse value-oriented services. The proposed framework primarily focuses on assessing cellular network performance with a user-centric approach via subjective metrics like end-user satisfaction, rather than solely on traditional communication-centric metrics. The proposed scheduling framework integrates a theoretical approach to guarantee QoS for various mobile UE types by dynamically allocating the necessary bandwidth resources. This also ensures guaranteed optimal performance for UEs, along with the minimal impact on the operational efficiency of UEs without specific service requirements.











Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not Applicable.
References
“IMT Traffic estimates for the years 2020 to 2030,” https://www.itu.int/pub/R-REP-M.2370.
Kumar A, Dhanagopal R, Albreem MA, Le D-N. A comprehensive study on the role of advanced technologies in 5G based smart hospital. Alexandria Eng J. 2021;60(6):5527–36.
Na M, Lee J, Choi G, Yu T, Choi J, Lee J, Bahk S. Operator’s Perspective on 6G: 6G Services, Vision, and Spectrum. IEEE Commun Mag. 2024;62(8):178–84.
Wang X, Mei J, Cui S, Wang C-X, Shen XS. Realizing 6G: The Operational Goals, Enabling Technologies of Future Networks, and Value-Oriented Intelligent Multi-Dimensional Multiple Access. IEEE Netw. 2023;37(1):10–7.
Minopoulos G, Psannis KE. Opportunities and Challenges of Tangible XR Applications for 5G Networks and Beyond. IEEE Consumer Elec Mag. 2023;12(6):9–19.
Murroni M, Anedda M, Fadda M, Ruiu P, Popescu V, Zaharia C, Giusto D. 6G—enabling the new smart city: a survey. Sensors. 2023;23(17):7528.
Singh PR, Singh VK, Yadav R, Chaurasia SN. 6G networks for artificial intelligence-enabled smart cities applications: a scoping review. Tele Infor Rep. 2023;9: 100044.
Rabnawaz R, Abid MKAMK, Aslam N, Bukhari F. “Exploring 6G Wireless Communication: Application Technologies, Challenges and Future Direction,” Intern. J. of Info. Syst. and Comp. Techn., 2023;2(2):26–43.
“Ericsson Mobility Report June 2023;” https://www.ericsson.com/49ddb2/assets/local/reports-papers/mobility-report/documents/2023/emr-june-2023-traffic-article.pdf.
Chiroma H, Nickolas P, Faruk N, Alozie E, Olayinka I-FY, Adewole KS, Abdulkarim A, Oloyede AA, Sowande OA, Garba S, et al. Large scale survey for radio propagation in developing machine learning model for path losses in communication systems. Sci African. 2023;19: e01550.
Ullah Y, Roslee MB, Mitani SM, Khan SA, Jusoh MH. A survey on handover and mobility management in 5G HetNets: current state, challenges, and future directions. Sensors. 2023;23(11):5081.
Elechi P, Orike S, Obinwanne TC. “Minimization of Co-Channel Interference in a Heterogeneous Network Environment,” Covenant Jour: of Engg: Tech:, 2023;
Baraković S, Skorin-Kapov L, et al. “Survey and challenges of QoE management issues in wireless networks,” J. of Comp. Netw. and Commun., 2013; vol. 2013, .
Liu Y, Zhu D, Ma W, Qian L. “A QoE-oriented scheduling scheme for HTTP streaming service in LTE system,” in IEEE Symp. on Comp. and Commun., 2015; pp. 889–894.
Alfayly A, Mkwawa I-H, Sun L, Ifeachor E. “QoE-based performance evaluation of scheduling algorithms over LTE,” in IEEE Globecom Worksh., 2012; pp. 1362–1366.
Granelli F, Sacchi C. “An OFDMA RRM strategy based on QoE maximization and radio resource redistribution,” in IEEE Aerospace Conf., 2012; pp. 1–9.
Hori T, Ohtsuki T. “QoE and throughput aware radio resource allocation algorithm in LTE network with users using different applications,” in IEEE Intern. Symp. on Pers., Ind., and Mob. Rad. Commun., 2016; pp. 1–6.
Khan MA. “A Technical and Economic Framework for End-to-End Realization of the User-Centric Telecommunication Paradigm,” Ph.D. dissertation, Berlin Institute of Technology, 2011
Wang C, Fang S-H, Wu H-C, Chiou S-M, Kuo W-H, Lin P-C. Novel user-placement ushering mechanism to improve quality-of-service for femtocell networks. IEEE Syst J. 2018;12(2):1993–2004.
Bosk M, Gajić M, Schwarzmann S, Lange S, Trivisonno R, Marquezan C, Zinner T. “Using 5G QoS Mechanisms to Achieve QoE-Aware Resource Allocation,” in Intern. Conf. on Netw. and Serv. Manag., 2021; pp. 283–291.
3GPP; TSG RAN; Services and System Aspects; Service requirements for video, imaging and audio for professional applications (VIAPA), Rel: 18, March 2024
3GPP; Tech: Spec: Group RAN Services and System Aspects; Enhancement of 3GPP support for V2X scenarios, Rel: 18, March 2024
3GPP; Tech: Spec: Group RAN Services and System Aspects; Study on enhancement of 3GPP support for 5G V2X scenarios, Rel: 16, Dec. 2018
5G: Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz, 3GPP, Tech. Rep. 38.901, v16.1.0,” Nov, 2020
5G NR; Physical layer measurements (Rel. 16), 3GPP, TS 38.215, v16.2.0,” July, 2020
Report ITU-R M.2412, Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-2020, Oct, 2017
Mogensen P, Na W, Kovacs IZ, Frederiksen F, Pokhariyal A, Pedersen KI, Kolding T, Hugl K, Kuusela M. LTE capacity compared to the shannon bound, in IEEE Trans. on Veh. Techn., April, 2007; pp. 1234–1238.
Baumgarten J, Kuerner T. LTE Downlink Link-Level Abstraction for System-Level Simulations, in European Wirel. Conf., 2014; pp. 1–5.
3GPP; TSG RAN; System performance evaluations on FeICIC, Rep. R1-114298, Ericsson, ST-Ericsson, Nov, 2011
Funding
This research is partially supported by the ASPIRE Award for Research Excellence (grant number: AARE20-368).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Author notes
Co-author Manzoor Ahmed Khan collaborated on this work while at UAE University.
- Manzoor Ahmed Khan
Contributions
All authors were involved in Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing in the original draft and review/editing of the paper draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Not Applicable.
Research Involving Humans or Animals
Not Applicable.
Informed Consent
Not Applicable.
AI tools
While preparing this work, the authors used the ChatGPT Tool cautiously to improve grammar, language and readability. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and took full responsibility for the publication’s content.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ullah, I., Dowhuszko, A.A., El-Sayed, H. et al. QoE-Driven Resource Management Framework for Next-Generation Mobile Networks. SN COMPUT. SCI. 6, 158 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-025-03711-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-025-03711-0