Abstract
We approach the subject of digital remains, understood as “online content of dead users,” from the perspective of computing professionals. Many scholars have argued for special ethical status of digital remains similar to the respect given to physical human remains. We propose a series of definitions including that of digital remains. These definitions emphasize the practical realities of managing computing systems. We posit that ideas of personhood and respect are both important when considering digital remains, but there are other concerns that challenge their special ethical status. We present three scenarios that illustrate important differences in how digital remains should be dealt with in different contexts. We conclude that due to environmental concerns, as well as practical and privacy considerations, absent any other overriding considerations, digital remains ought to be deleted. We also suggest that our notion of “abandoned digital artifacts” might provide a better conception of digital remains and be helpful in articulating accounts of personhood and personal identity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
We do not analyze or generate any datasets because our work proceeds within a theoretical approach.
Materials/Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. (2018). New York: Association for computing machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274591
Berkowitz, J. (2018). Black Mirror is obsessed with digital hell because we are living in it. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/40512450/black-mirror-is-obsessed-with-digital-hell-because-we-are-living-in-it
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1979). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press.
Bingaman, J. (2020). “Dude I’ve never felt this way towards a celebrity death”: Parasocial grieving and the collective mourning of Kobe Bryant on Reddit. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222820971531
Buitelaar, J. C. (2017). Post-mortem privacy and informational self-determination. Ethics and Information Technology, 19(2), 129–142.
Champney, T. H. (2016). The business of bodies: Ethical perspectives on for-profit body donation companies. Clinical Anatomy, 29(1), 25–29.
DeGroot, J. M., & Leith, A. P. (2018). RIP Kutner: Parasocial grief following the death of a television character. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 77(3), 199–216.
Eaton, M. M. (2008). Aesthetic obligations. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 66(1), 1–9.
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (EU). (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679
Fagone, J. (2021). The Jessica simulation: Love and loss in the age of A.I. https://www.sfchronicle.com/projects/2021/jessica-simulation-artificial-intelligence/. 23 Jul. Accessed Sept 2021.
Ghosh, S. K. (2020). The practice of ethics in the context of human dissection: Setting standards for future physicians. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger, 232, 151577.
Gibson, M. (2014). Digital objects of the dead: Negotiating electronic remains. In: Van Brussel L., Carpentier N. (eds) The Social Construction of Death. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137391919_12
Grodzinsky, F. S., Miller, K. W., & Wolf, M. J. (2015). Developing automated deceptions and the impact on trust. Philosophy & Technology, 28(1), 91–105.
Harbinja, E., & Pearce, H. (2020). Your data will never die, but you will: A comparative analysis of US and UK post-mortem data donation frameworks. Computer Law & Security Review, 36, 105403.
Lingel, J. (2013). The digital remains: Social media and practices of online grief. The Information Society, 29, 190–195.
Marmoy, C. A. F. (1958). The ‘Auto-Icon’ of Jeremy Bentham at University College. London. Medical History, 2(2), 77–86.
Meese, J., Nansen, B., Kohn, T., Arnold, M., & Gibbs, M. (2015). Posthumous personhood and the affordances of digital media. Mortality, 20(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2015.1083724
Mitchell, L. M., Stephenson, P. H., Cadell, S., & Macdonald, M. E. (2012). Death and grief on-line: Virtual memorialization and changing concepts of childhood death and parental bereavement on the Internet. Health Sociology Review, 21(4), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2012.21.4.413
Morse, T., & Birnhack, M. (2019) Digital remains: The users’ perspectives. Digital Afterlife: Death Matters in a Digital Age, 107–126.
Norlock, K. J. (2017). Real (and) imaginal relationships with the dead. J Value Inquiry, 51, 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-016-9573-6
Öhman, C., & Floridi, L. (2017). The political economy of death in the age of information: A critical approach to the digital afterlife industry. Minds & Machines, 27, 639–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9445-2
Olson, E. T. (2021). Personal identity. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), Edward N Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/identity-personal. Accessed Sept 2021.
Shoemaker, D. (2021). Personal identity and ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/identity-ethics. Accessed Sept 2021.
Skloot, R. (2017). The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. Broadway Paperbacks.
Snider, B. (2014). Who legally owns your Facebook posts?. Findlaw. https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/who-legally-ownsyour-facebook-posts/. Accessed September 2021.
Stokes, P. (2012). Ghosts in the Machine: Do the dead live on in Facebook? Philosophy & Technology, 25, 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-011-0050-7.
Tirosh, N. (2019). The dialectics of forgetting in Kafka’s writings and will. Memory Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698019894689
Ulgium, P. (2018). Digital remains made public: Sharing the dead online and our future digital mortuary landscape. AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology, 3:153–176.
Wolf, M. J., Miller, K. W., & Grodzinsky, F. S. (2017). Why we should have seen that coming. Orbit, 1, 49.
Wright, N. (2014). Death and the internet: The implications of the digital afterlife. First Monday, 19(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i6.4998
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. Alexis Elder for her insightful comments on personhood and to anonymous reviewers for their helpful critiques.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Each author contributed equally to the development of the ideas present in the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Not applicable.
Consent
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolf, M.J., Grodzinsky, F.S. & Miller, K.W. Ethical Reflections on Handling Digital Remains: Computing Professionals Picking Up Bones. DISO 1, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00004-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00004-4