Skip to main content
Log in

Improving vehicle performance using adaptive control techniques

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews a collaborative research programme aimed at improving vehicle performance using adaptive control techniques. Initially the design of active suspension systems is considered, and the benefits of using a non-linear controller model with an adaptive control scheme are discussed. Adaptive schemes for active roll control are then considered, and the merits of incorporating a Smith predictor to accommodate for system delays are high-lighted. Preliminary research in adaptive cruise control and collision avoidance is discussed and plans for further developments are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jurgen RK (1995) The electronic motorist. IEEE Spectrum, March, 37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharp RS, Crolla DA (1987) Road vehicle suspension design—a review. Vehicle Syst Dynamics 16:167–192

    Google Scholar 

  3. Williams RA (1997) Automotive active suspensions, Parts 1 and 2. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D 211:415–444

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paterson CA (1993) Computer controlled suspension systems. PhD Thesis, Coventry University

  5. Webb AC, Burnham KJ, James DJG, et al. (1995) A comparative study of passive and low bandwidth active suspension systems. J Syst Sci 21:27–41

    Google Scholar 

  6. Webb AC, Burnham KJ, James DJG, et al. (1996) On-line adaptive control of a low bandwidth active suspension system. Proceedings UKACC International Conference on Control '96, IEE Conference Publication No 427, pp 1154–1159

  7. Moulton AE, Best A (1979) Hydragas suspension. SAE 790374

  8. Williams RA, Best A, Crawford IL (1993) Refined low frequency active suspension. IMechE, C 446-028-93

  9. Williams RA, Burnham KJ, Webb AC (1996) Developments for oleo-pneumatic active suspension. Proceedings IEEE Symposium Computer Aided Control System Design, Dearborn, MI, pp 44–49

  10. Webb AC, Burnham KJ, James DJG, et al. (1996) Adaptive multimodal control of a low bandwidth active suspension system. Proceedings IFAC World Congress 96, San Francisco, Vol. Q, pp 255–260

  11. Webb AC (1986) Self-tuning low bandwidth active suspension systems. PhD Thesis, Conventry University

  12. Sharp RS, Pan D (1993) On the design of an active roll control system for a luxury car. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D, J Automobile Eng 207:275–284

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miller SA, Williams RA, Burnham KJ (1994) Active roll-control, simulation and experimentation. Proceedings 10th International Conference on Systems Engineering, Conventry University, UK, pp 851–860

  14. Warwick K, Rees D (1986) Industrial digital control systems. IEE Control Engineering Series, Peter Peregrinus Press

  15. Richardson M, Barber P, David L (1997) Knowledge based collision avoidance manoeuvres. Proceedings 12th International Conference on Systems Engineering, Coventry University, UK, pp 565–570

  16. Tribe RH, Young E, Conlong R (1992) Improved obstacle detection by sensor fusion. IEE Prometheus & Drive Colloquium, London

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. J. G. James.

About this article

Cite this article

James, D.J.G., Burnham, K.J., Richardson, M.J. et al. Improving vehicle performance using adaptive control techniques. Artif Life Robotics 3, 236–241 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481187

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481187

Key words

Navigation