Skip to main content
Log in

Posterior Information-Based Image Measurement Matrix Optimization

  • Published:
Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to enhance the robustness of image compression sensing system and reduce the mutual coherence between measurement matrix and sparse basis, this paper proposes an image measurement matrix optimization algorithm based on posterior information. Based on the traditional measurement matrix optimization model, the proposed algorithm considers the image reconstruction error from the OMP algorithm and uses it as a regular term. Matrix F-norm expansion and singular value decomposition are used to reduce the computational complexity and ensure the convergence of algorithm. Besides, the gradient matrix method is used to iteratively solve the measurement matrix. The proposed measurement matrix optimization model makes full use of the reconstruction error information of the image itself, not only improves the robustness of image compression sensing system, but also reduces the mutual coherence between the measurement matrix and the sparse basis. Experiments results show that compared with the state-of-the-art measurement matrix optimization algorithms, the proposed algorithm can reduce the average correlation coefficient more effectively, and the peak signal-to-noise ratio of the image can be increased by up to 1.2 dB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. V. Abolghasemi, S. Ferdowsi, S. Sanei, A gradient-based alternating minimization approach for optimization of the measurement matrix in compressive sensing. Signal Process. 92(4), 999–1009 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R.G. Baraniuk, Compressive sensing [lecture notes]. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 24(4), 118–121 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E.J. Candes, M.B. Wakin, An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 25(2), 21–30 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Cohen, W. Dahmen, R. Devore, Compressed sensing and best k-term approximation. J Ame Math Soc. 22(1), 211–231 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. E.J. Candes, T. Tao, Decoding by linear programming. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 51(12), 4203–4215 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. S.S. Chen, D.M.A. Saunders, Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM Rev. 43(1), 129–159 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. D.L. Donoho, Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52(4), 1289–1306 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. D.L. Donoho, X. Huo, Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 47(7), 2845–2862 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. E.M. Eksioglu, O. Bayir, K-SVD meets transform learning: transform K-SVD. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 21(3), 347–351 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Elad, Optimized projections for compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 55(12), 5695–5702 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Hong, H. Bai, S. Li, Z. Zhu, An efficient algorithm for designing projection matrix in compressive sensing based on alternating optimization. Signal Process. 125(2), 9–20 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Hong, Z. Zhu, Online learning sensing matrix and sparsifying dictionary simultaneously for compressive sensing. Signal Process. 153(12), 188–196 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Hong, Z. Zhu, An efficient method for robust projection matrix design. Signal Process. 143(3), 200–210 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Jiajun, B. Donghai, W. Qingpei, A novel multi-dictionary framework with global sensing matrix design for compressed sensing. Signal Process. 152, 69–78 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Q. Jiang, S. Li, H. Bai, R.C. Lamare, X. He, Gradient-based algorithm for designing sensing matrix considering real mutual coherence for compressed sensing systems. IET Signal Proc. 11(4), 356–363 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Li, X. Li, S. Li, H. Bai, Q. Jiang, X. He, Designing robust sensing matrix for image compression. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24(12), 5389–5400 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Li, Z. Zhu, D. Yang, L. Chang, H. Bai, On projection matrix optimization for compressive sensing systems. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 61(11), 2887–2898 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. G. Li, Z. Zhu, X. Wu, On joint optimization of sensing matrix and sparsifying dictionary for robust compressed sensing systems. Digit Signal Process. 73(3), 62–71 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Russell, A. Torralba, W.T. Freeman, C. Labelme. The Open Annotation Tool, MIT. [Online]. Available: https://labelme2.csail.mit.edu//Release3.0/browserTools/php/dataset.php (2008).

  20. C. Rusu, N. Gonzalez-Prelcic, Designing incoherent frames through convex techniques for optimized compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 64(9), 2334–2344 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. T. Strohmer, R.W. Heath, Grassmannian frames with applications to coding and communication. Appl Comput Harmon Anal. 14(3), 257–275 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. J.A. Tropp, Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 50(10), 2231–2242 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Tropp, A.C. Gilbert, Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 53(12), 4655–4666 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Xu, Y. Pi, Z. Cao, Optimized projection matrix for compressive sensing. Eurasip J Adv Signal Process. 43(2), 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Zibulevsky, M. Elad, L1–L2 Optimization in signal and image processing. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 27(3), 76–88 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61671095). The authors also would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Zhao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Huang, C., Sun, C. et al. Posterior Information-Based Image Measurement Matrix Optimization. Circuits Syst Signal Process 40, 2361–2375 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-020-01573-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-020-01573-w

Keywords

Navigation