Skip to main content
Log in

Real-time tracking-with-detection for coping with viewpoint change

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Machine Vision and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider real-time visual tracking with targets undergoing viewpoint changes. The problem is evaluated on a new and extensive dataset of vehicles undergoing large viewpoint changes. We propose an evaluation method in which tracking accuracy is measured under real-time computational complexity constraints and find that state-of-the-art agnostic trackers, as well as class detectors, are still struggling with this task. We study tracking schemes fusing real-time agnostic trackers with a non-real-time class detector used for template update, with two dominating update strategies emerging. We rigorously analyze the template update latency and demonstrate that such methods significantly outperform stand-alone trackers and class detectors. Results are demonstrated using two different trackers and a state-of-the-art classifier, and at several operating points of algorithm/hardware computational speed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.eng.tau.ac.il/~oron/TWD/TWD.html.

References

  1. Andriluka, M., Roth, S., Schiele, B.: People-tracking-by-detection and people-detection-by-tracking. In: CVPR (2008)

  2. Avidan, S.: Support vector tracking. In: PAMI (2004)

  3. Avidan, S.: Ensemble tracking. In: CVPR (2005)

  4. Babenko, B., Yang, M., Belongie, S.: Visual tracking with online multiple instance learning. In: CVPR (2009)

  5. Bao, C., Wu, Y., Ling, H., Ji, H.: Real time robust l1 tracker using accelerated proximal gradient approach. In: CVPR (2012)

  6. Bar-Hillel, A., Levi, D., Krupka, E., Goldberg, C.: Part-based feature synthesis for human detection. In: ECCV (2010)

  7. Benenson, R., Mathias, M., Timofte, R., Van Gool, L.: Pedestrian detection at 100 frames per second. In: CVPR (2012)

  8. Bernardin, K., Stiefelhagen, R.: Evaluating multiple object tracking performance: the clear mot metrics. EURASIP J. Image Video Process. (2008)

  9. Cootes, T., Edwards, G., Taylor, C.: Active appearance models. In: TPAMI (2001)

  10. Dollár, P., Belongie, S., Perona, P.: The fastest pedestrian detector in the west. In: BMVC (2010)

  11. Ess, A., Leibe, B., Schindler, K., Van-Gool, L.: Robust multi-person tracking from a mobile platform. In: TPAMI (2009)

  12. Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C., Winn, J., Zisserman, A.: The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge 2011 (VOC2011) Results. http://www.pascal-network.org/challenges/VOC/voc2011/workshop/index.html

  13. Fan, J., Shen, X., Wu, Y.: What are we tracking: a unified approach of tracking and recognition. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(2), 549–560 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Felzenszwalb, P., Girshick, R., McAllester, D.: Discriminatively Trained Deformable Part Models, Release 4. http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/pff/latent-release4/

  15. Felzenszwalb, P., Girshick, R., McAllester, D.: Cascade object detection with deformable part models. In: CVPR (2010)

  16. Felzenszwalb, P., Girshick, R., McAllester, D., Ramanan, D.: Object detection with discriminatively trained part based models. In: TPAMI (2010)

  17. Felzenszwalb, P., Huttenlocher, D.: Pictorial structures for object recognition. In: IJCV 61(1) (2005)

  18. Geiger, A., Lenz, P., Urtasun, R.: Are we ready for autonomous driving? the kitti vision benchmark suite. In: CVPR (2012)

  19. Grabner, H., Grabner, M., Bischof, H.: Real-time tracking via online boosting. In: BMVC (2006)

  20. Hager, G., Belhumeur, P.: Efficient region tracking with parametric models of geometry and illumination. In: TPAMI (1998)

  21. Jia, X., Lu, H., Yang, M.: Visual tracking via adaptive structural local sparse appearance model. In: CVPR (2012)

  22. Kalal, Z., Mikolajczyk, K., Matas, J.: Tracking-learning-detection. In: TPAMI (2010)

  23. Kasturi, R., Goldgof, D., Manohar, S., Garofolo, J., Bowers, R., Boonstra, M., Korzhova, V., Zhang, J.: Framework for performance evaluation of face, text, and vehicle detection and tracking in video: data, metrics, and protocol. In: PAMI (2009)

  24. Kwon, J., Lee, K.: Visual tracking decomposition. In: CVPR (2010)

  25. Leibe, B., Schindler, K., Cornelis, N., Van-Gool, L.: Coupled object detection and tracking from static cameras and moving vehicles. In: TPAMI (2008)

  26. Leichter, I., Krupka, E.: Monotonicity and error type differentiability in performance measures for target detection and tracking in video. In: CVPR (2012)

  27. Lucas, B., Kanade, T.: An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. In: Proccedings of Imageing Understanding Workshop (1981)

  28. Matthews, I., Baker, S.: Lucas-kanade 20 years on: a unifying framework. In: IJCV (2004)

  29. Matthews, I., Ishikawa, T., Baker, S.: The template update problem. In: TPAMI (2004)

  30. Oron, S., Bar-Hillel, A., Levi, D., Avidan, S.: Locally orderless tracking. In: CVPR (2012)

  31. Panin, G., Klose, S., Knoll, A.: Real-time articulated hand detection and pose estimation. In: Advances in Visual Computing (2009)

  32. Papanikolopoulos, N., Khosla, P., Kanade, T.: Visual tracking of a moving target by a camera mounted on a robot: a combination of control and vision. In: IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation (1993)

  33. Ross, D., Lim, J., Lin, R., Yang, M.: Incremental learning for robust visual tracking. In: IJCV (2007)

  34. Santner, J., Leistner, C., Saffari, A., Pock, T., Bischof, H.: Prost:parallel robust online simple tracking. In: CVPR (2010)

  35. Shotton, J., Fitzgibbon, A., Cook, M., Sharp, T., Finocchio, M., Moore, R., Kipman, A., Blake, A.: Real-time human pose recognition in parts from a single depth image. In: CVPR (2011)

  36. Siebel, N., Maybank, S.: Fusion of multiple tracking algorithms for robust people tracking. In: ECCV (2002)

  37. Stalder, S., Grabner, H., van Gool, L.: Beyond semi-supervised tracking: tracking should be as simple as detection, but not simpler than recognition. In: ICCV Workshops (2009)

  38. Stauffer, C., Grimson, E.: Learning patterns of activity using real-time tracking. In: PAMI (2000)

  39. Thirteenth IEEE International Workshop On Performance Evaluation Of Tracking And Surveillance (Pets) (2010)

  40. Williams, O., Blake, A., Cipolla, R.: Sparse bayesian learning for efficient visual tracking. In: TPAMI (2005)

  41. Wu, Y., Lim, J., Yang, M.: Online object tracking: a benchmark. In: CVPR (2005)

  42. Yilmaz, A., Javed, O., Shah, M.: Object tracking: a survey. ACM Comp. Surv. 38(4) (2006)

  43. Zhang, K., Zhang, L., Yang, M.: Real-time compressive tracking. In: ECCV (2012)

  44. Zhong, W., Lu, H., Yang, M.: Robust object tracking via sparsity-based collaborative model. In: CVPR (2012)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaul Oron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oron, S., Bar-Hillel, A. & Avidan, S. Real-time tracking-with-detection for coping with viewpoint change. Machine Vision and Applications 26, 507–518 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-015-0676-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-015-0676-z

Keywords

Navigation