Abstract
Action research has been extensively used world-wide for decision making related to policy due to its nature of involving the researcher and decision maker in the process. Following independence in India, one of the major revolutions was brought about in the dairy sector with regard to complete management systems. Most innovations and changes occurred in the line function while the staff function was more often neglected in the overall change. The authors undertook an action research study focusing on staff function and relayed improvements that can influence policy related to decision making. The authors have also developed the MPS model for staff function which can help a company or industry in appraising their own staff and functions which can thereby aid in utilising their potential.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris C (1980) Inner contradictions of rigorous research. Academic, New York
Argyris C, Schon D (1989) Participatory action research and action science compared. Am Behav Sci 9(5):612–623
Beckhard R (1969) Organization development: strategies and models. Addison-Wesley, Mass
Budhwar P, Budhwar L (1999) Research methods for business studies. Global Business Press, New Delhi, pp 69–79
Chanda N, Pathak K (2001) Study of supply chain of AMUL through a simulation based approach. IIMA
Chein I, Cook S, Harding J (1948) The field of action research. Am Psychol 3:43–50
Cooper D, Schindler P (1998) Business research methods, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, pp 55–83
Elden M, Chisholm RF (1993) Emerging varieties of action research. Hum Relat 46:121–142
Ferrance, E (2001) Action research cycle. http://www.phy.nau.edu/~danmac/actionrsch.html. Cited 13 May 2001
French WL, Bell CH (1999) Organization development — behavioral science interventions for organizational improvement, 6th edn. Pearson Education Asia, Delhi, p 130
George S (1994) A matter of people — co-operative dairying in India and Zimbabwe. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp 39–55
Gupta SL (1999) Sales and distribution management. Excel Books, New Delhi
Kemmis S, McTaggart R (1988) The action research planner 3rd ed. Deakin University Press, Victoria, Australia
Kotter J (1990) A force for change: How leadership differs from management. Free Press, New York, pp 4–5
Kotter J (1995) Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Bus Rev, March–April, p 61
Lees R, George S (1975) Action-research in community development. Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp 59–62, 188–191
Lewin K (1947) Frontiers in group dynamics. Hum Relat 1(2) pp 143–153
Mathur K, Sethi H (1983) Action research for development. Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi
McTaggart R (ed) (1997) Participatory action research: international contexts and consequences. State University of New York Press, Albany
Oja SN, Smulyan L (1989) Collaborative action research: a developmental approach. Falmer, New York
Patel SM, Thakur DS, Pandey MK (1975) Impact of milk co-operatives in Gujarat. Institute of Co-operative Management, Ahmedabad, pp 26–53
Peters M, Robinson V (1984) The origins and status of action research. J Appl Behav Sci 20(2):113–124
Rapoport R (1970) Three dilemmas in action research. Hum Relat 23:488–513
Shah T (1995) Making farmers co-operative work. Sage, New Delhi, pp 36–53
Singh K, Das MV (1984) The impact of operation flood at the village level. Institute of Rural Management Anand, Anand, pp 8–9
Singh, K (2000) Some issues in professionalising the management of agribusiness co-operative in India with special reference to dairy co-operatives. Annual Report of Amul, pp 77–90
Stoner J, Freeman R, Gilbert D (2000) Management, 6th edn. Prentice Hall of India, pp 353–54
Warmington A (1979) Action research: its methods and implications. Working Paper 48, Manchester Business School, England
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mehta, D., Pancholi, J. & Shukla, P. Action research in policy making: a case in the dairy industry in Gujarat, India. AI & Soc 18, 344–363 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-003-0288-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-003-0288-4