Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On the industrialisation of biology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The times required to develop new drugs is growing continuously and most drugs fail in the development process because we lack the detailed knowledge of biology and physiology needed to understand the result of a proposed treatment. The problem is one of complexity—we do not know the full complexity of living organisms, neither does traditional biology have the language to capture and integrate complexity. As a result, the life sciences are undergoing a period of radical change as the technological and mathematical methods developed for the analysis of physical sciences are being adapted for use in understanding living systems. This introduction of quantitative mathematical methods to represent and understand a previously descriptive subject resembles the Newtonian revolution in physics and its subsequent impact upon industry and manufacture. And just as in the post-Newtonian developments, the new ways are being resisted as the traditional reductionist biologists argue against a system level analysis. The comparison between the industrial revolution and the emerging revolution in life sciences is so strong that it can be usefully employed to explain the current process—the industrialisation of biology—in a way that informs the traditionalist movement. In particular, we draw upon ideas from innovation cycles and the staging of change in science and industry to clarify the current change processes in life science. Using specific examples in technology development we outline lessons that can be learnt in order to smooth the process of change and make it a harmonious one, rather than one of conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angeli D, Sontag E (2003) Monotone control systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 48:1684–1698

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Babbage C (1832) On the economy of machinery and manufactures. Charles Knight, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Balen M (2003) A very english deceit. Fourth Estate

  • Barnett C (2001) The verdict of peace. MacMillan. Part of the pride and fall sequence

  • Belbin M (1993) Team roles at work. Butterworth, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendat JS, Piersol AG (1986) Random data: analysis and measurement procedures, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett S (1979) A history of control engineering 1800–1930. Peter Peregrinus, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Big Trouble for Merck. The Economist, November 4th 2004

  • Cantor CA, Smith CL (1999) Genomics: the science and technology behind the human genome project. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell JA (1984) James Nasmyth and the Steam Hammer. Trans Newcomen Soc 56:133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen CM (1997) The innovator’s dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen CM (2003) The innovator’s solution. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen CM (2004) Seeing what is next. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements P (1970) Marc Isambard Brunel. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham I (2003) Genome mapping and sequencing. Horizon Scientific Press, Norfolk

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall G (2002) Organizational conditions and levels of creativity. In: Miller KM (ed) Managing innovation and change, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, London, pp 125–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans FT (1994) The Maudsley Touch: Henry Maudsley, product of the past, maker of the future. Tran Newcomen Soc 66:153–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridson MS (1995) Confusions and delusions: Tulipmania, the South Sea Bubble and the Madness of Crowds. Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Gett AV, Hodgkin PD (2000) A cellular calculus for signal integration by T cells. Nat Immunol 1:239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill KS (1996) The foundations of human-centred systems. In Gill KS (ed) Human-machine-symbiosis. Springer, London, pp 1–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimpel J (1976) The medieval machine: the industrial revolution of the middle ages. Victor Gollanz, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribbin J (2002) Science a history 1543–2001. Penguin Books, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield C (1996) Canals of the West Midlands. David and Charles, Devon

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker S (1984) Not much of an engineer. Airlife, Shrewsbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter WA (1951) James Hargreaves and the invention of the Spinning Jenny. Trans Newcomen Soc 28:141–151 (Available from the Newcomen Society online archive)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter P (2005) IUPS physiome roadmap. Available from the IUPS Physiome Project website

  • Hyman A (1984) Charles Babbage: pioneer of the computer. OUP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamentsky MR, Melamed LA, Derman H (1965) New instrument for ultrarapid cell analysis. Science 150:630–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kansal AR, Trimmer J (2005) Application of predictive biosimulation within pharmaceutical clinical development. In: Doyle FJ (ed) Proceedings of foundations of systems biology in engineering, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, pp 5–12

  • Kondratieff JJ (1925) The long wave in economic life. Rev Econ Stat 17:105–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff RN, Schaller RR (2001) Science and technology roadmaps. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 48:132–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyranos J (2004) High throughput analysis for early drug discovery. Academic Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebler DC (2001) Introduction to proteomics. Humana Press, Clifton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey MC, Santillan M (2005) Mathematics, biology and physics: interactions and interdependence. Not Am Math Soc 53:832–840

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Merck to cut 7,000 jobs after the loss of Vioxx. The Guardian, November 30th 2005

  • Mesarovic MD (1968) Systems theory and biology: views of a theoretician. In Mesarovic MD (ed) Systems theory and biology, vol 351. Springer, Berlin, pp 59–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldavan A (1934) Photo-electric technique for the counting of microscopical cells. Science 80:188–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble D (2002) Modelling the heart: from genes to cells to the whole organ. Science 295:1678–1682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavord A (2000) The tulip. Bloomsbury Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Pears I (1997) An instance of the fingerpost. Vintage Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JP (2004) Flow cytometry. In: Encyclopedia of biomaterials and biomedical engineering, 1st ed. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 630–640

  • Rolt LTC (1962) The inland waterways of England. Allen and Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolt LTC (1986) Tools for the job. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office

  • Schlumpeter JA (1938) Business cycles: a theoretical and statistical analysis of the capitalist system. McGraw Hill, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro HM (1994) Practical flow cytometry. Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderstrom T, Stoica P (1989) System identification. Prentice Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag E (2005) Molecular systems biology and control. Eur J Control 11:1–40

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • The Drugs Industry. The Economist, March 17th 2005

  • Timmer J, Swameye I, Sandra O, Mnller TG, Faller D, Klingmnller U (2004) Tests for cycling in a signalling pathway. J R Stat Soc C: Appl Stat 53:557–568

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Uglow J (2002) The lunar men. Faber and Faber, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Grundy AB (1988) Techniques of structured problem solving. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Various Authors (2003) Special issue on systems biology. IEEE Control Syst Mag 23

  • Wolkenhauer O, Sreenath SN, Wellstead P, Ullar M, Cho K-H (2005) A systems and signal-oriented approach to intracellular dynamics. Biochem Soc Trans 33(3):505–515

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

In writing this article, L.T.C. Rolt’s writings on the history of engineering have been a constant source of stimulation and inspiration. In particular, I have used (Rolt 1986) as the primary source for the history of machine tools. In addition, the online archive of the Newcomen Society (http://www.newcomen.com)and the internet resources of the Purdue University cytometry laboratory (http://www.cyto.purdue.edu) have been of invaluable assistance. The Hamilton Institute systems biology team, together with Christopher Kellett and Rick Middleton, were constructive and helpful critics of this article. Figure 4 is taken from an original diagram created by Eric Bullinger of the Hamilton Institute. Finally, it is a great pleasure to acknowledge the support of Clayton Christensen and for his comments on the ideas described here.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Wellstead.

Additional information

This work was supported by Science Foundation Ireland under grant 03/RP1/I382.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wellstead, P. On the industrialisation of biology. AI & Soc 26, 21–33 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0232-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0232-3

Keywords

Navigation