Skip to main content
Log in

Advocating an ethical memory model for artificial companions from a human-centred perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the ethical implications of applying three major ethical theories to the memory structure of an artificial companion that might have different embodiments such as a physical robot or a graphical character on a hand-held device. We start by proposing an ethical memory model and then make use of an action-centric framework to evaluate its ethical implications. The case that we discuss is that of digital artefacts that autonomously record and store user data, where this data are used as a resource for future interaction with users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ++http://www.tamagotchieurope.com/.

References

  • Allen C, Wallach W, Smit I (2006) Why machine ethics? IEEE Intel Sys 21(4):12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann EM, Gray WD (2000) Managing attention by preparing to forget. Int J Cogn Ergon 1(4):152–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambo P (2007) Mechanical love, a film directed by Phie Ambo

  • Anderson JR (2007) Kogniotive psychologie. Eine Einführung (6th edn) Heidelberg

  • Anderson SL (2008) Asimov’s “three laws of robotics” and machine metaethics. AI Soc 22(4):477–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkin RC (2009) Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots. CRC Press

  • Asimov I (1950) I robot. Doubleday and Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brom C, Lukavsky J (2009) Towards virtual characters with a full episodic memory II: the episodic memory strikes back”, AAMAS, pp 1–8

  • Brom C, Peskova K, Lukavskyz J (2007) What does your actor remember? Towards characters with a full episodic memory. In: Cavazza M, Donikian S (eds): ICVS. vol 4871 of lecture notes in computer science, Springer, 89–101

  • CHRIS (2008) The CHRIS project, http://www.chrisfp7.eu/index.html

  • Clarke R (1993) Asimov’s laws of robotics: implications for information technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Companions (2007) Companions project, http://www.companions-project.org/

  • Denning T, Matuszek C, Koscher K, Smith JR, Kohno T (2009) A spotlight on security and privacy risks with future household robots: attacks and lessons. In Proceedings of the UbiComp 09, 30 sept–3 Oct 2009

  • Endo Y (2007) Anticipatory robot control for a partially observable environment using episodic memories. Georgia Tech Mobile Robot Lab Tech Rep, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernaeus Y, Tholander J, Jonsson M (2008) Beyond representations: towards an action-centric perspective on tangible interaction. Int J Arts Technol 1(3/4):249–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernaeus Y, Jacobsson M, Ljungblad S, Holmquist LE (2009) Are we living in a robot cargo cult? In: 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction, 9–13 March 2009, La Jolla, California, USA

  • Friedman B (ed) (1997) Human values and the design of computer technology, Cambridge P

  • Gert B (1988) Morality: a new justification of the moral rules. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Gips J (1995) Towards the ethical robot. In: Ford K, Glymour C, Hayes P (eds) Android epstemology. MIT Press, cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold PE (1992) A proposed neurobiological basis for regulating memory storage for significant events. In: Winograd E, Neisser U (eds) Affect and accuracy in recall: studies of “flashbulb” memories Vol 4. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 141–161

  • Halpern S (2008) Can’t remember what i forgot: the good news from the front lines of memory research. Harmony Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho WC, Lim M, Vargas PA, Enz S, Dautenhahn K, Aylett R (2009) An initial memory model for virtual and robot companions supporting migration and long-term interaction. In the 18th IEEE ROMAN’2009, Japan, pp 277–284

  • Ishikawa M (1996) Structural learning with forgetting. Neural Netw 9(3):509–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson M (2009) Play, belief and stories about robots: a case study of a pleo blogging community In proceedings of Ro-Man: IEEE

  • Kaplan F (2004) Everyday robotics: robots as everyday objects. In proceedings of joint sOc-EUSAI conference, pp 59–64

  • Kelley JF (1983) An empirical methodology for writing user-friendly natural language computer applications. In proceedings of ACM, pp 193–196 ACM

  • Klemmer SR, Hartmann B, Takayama L (2006) How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. In proceedings of DIS ‘06. ACM Press. 140–149

  • Koychev I (2000) Gradual forgetting for adaptation to concept drift. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2000 workshop current issues in spatio-temporal reasoning, Berlin

  • Lim M, Aylett R, Ho WC, Enz S, Vargas PA (2009) A socially-aware memory for companion agents. IVA’2009, Amsterdan, pp 20–26

  • LIREC (2008) The LIREC project, http://www.lirec.org/

  • Mirza N, Nehaniv C, Dautenhahn D, te Boekhorst R (2006) Interaction histories: from experience to action and back again. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE international conference on development and learning (ICDL), 2006

  • Mirza N, Nehaniv C, Dautenhahn D, te Boekhorst R (2007) Grounded sensorimotor interaction histories in an information theoretic metric space for robot ontogeny. Adapt Behav 15(2):167–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy R, Woods DD (2009) Beyond Asimov: the three laws of responsible robotics. IEEE Intel Syst 24(4):14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolfi S, Floreano D (2000) Evolutionary robotics: the biology, intelligence, and technology of self-organizing machines. MIT Press

  • Nuxoll A, Laird J (2004) A cognitive model of episodic memory integrated with a general cognitive architecture. In: International conference on cognitive modeling

  • Ogino M, Ooide T, Watanabe A, Asada M (2007) Acquiring peekaboo communication: early communication model based on reward prediction. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference in development and learning (ICDL)

  • Schank RC, Abelson R (1995) Knowledge and memory: the real story. In: Robert S, Wyer Jr (eds) Knowledge and memory: the real story. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 1–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow R (2002) The march of the robot dogs. Centre for applied philosophy and public ethics, The University of Melbourne

  • Sparrow R (2006) Killer Robots. J Appl Philos 24(1):62–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syrdal DS, Walters ML,Otero NR, Koay KL, Datenhahn K (2007) He knows when you are —privacy and the personal robot. AAAI-07

  • Tecuci D, Porter B (2007) A generic memory module for events. In proceedings of the 20th Florida Artificial intelligence research society conference

  • Vargas PA, Ho WC, Lim M, Enz S, Aylett R (2009) To forget or not to forget: towards a roboethical memory control, to appear at the AISB social understanding of AI workshop, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp 18–23

  • Vargas PA, Freitas AA, Lim M, Ho W, Enz S, Ayllet R. (2010) Forgetting and generalisation in a memory model for robot companions: a data mining approach. In the proceedings of the AISB2010 convention, De Montfort University, UK

  • Veruggio G (2005) The birth of roboethics,” ICRA 2005, IEEE international conference on robotics and automation workshop on Robo-Ethics, Barcelona

  • Veruggio G, Operto F (2006) Roboethics: a bottom-up interdisciplinary discourse in the field of applied ethics in robotics. International review of information ethics, vol 6, pp 3–8

  • Wallach W, Allen C (2009) Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia A. Vargas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vargas, P.A., Fernaeus, Y., Lim, M.Y. et al. Advocating an ethical memory model for artificial companions from a human-centred perspective. AI & Soc 26, 329–337 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0313-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0313-3

Keywords

Navigation