Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is it possible to cure Internet addiction with the Internet?

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Significant technological advancements over the last two decades have led to enhanced accessibility to computing devices and the Internet. Our society is experiencing an ever-growing integration of the Internet into everyday lives, and this has transformed the way we obtain and exchange information, communicate and interact with one another as well as conduct business. However, the term ‘Internet addiction’ (IA) has emerged from problematic and excessive Internet usage which leads to the development of addictive cyber-behaviours, causing health and social problems. The most commonly used intervention treatments such as motivational interviewing, cognitive-behavioural therapy, and retreat or inpatient care mix a variety of psychotherapy theories to treat such addictive behaviour and try to address underlying psychosocial issues that are often coexistent with IA, but the efficacy of these approaches is not yet proved. The aim of this paper is to address the question of whether it is possible to cure IA with the Internet. After detailing the current state-of-the-art including various IA definitions, risk factors, assessment methods and IA treatments, we outline the main research challenges that need to be solved. Moreover, we propose an Internet-based IA Recovery Framework (IARF) which uses AI to closely observe, visualize and analyse patient’s Internet usage behaviour for possible staged intervention. The proposal to use smart Internet-based systems to control IA can be expected to be controversial. This paper is intended to stimulate further discussion and research in IA recovery through Internet-based frameworks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Sheibani S (2015) Internet addiction: a structured literature review and future research directions. Paper presented at the computer science, computer engineering, and social media (CSCESM), 2015 second international conference, Lodz, Poland, pp 175–181

  • Bernardi S, Pallanti S (2009) Internet addiction: a descriptive clinical study focusing on comorbidities and dissociative symptoms. Compr Psychiatry 50(6):510–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Oh JH (2012) The attention economy: measuring the value of free digital services on the internet. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on information systems, Orlando. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2012/proceedings/EconomicsValue/9/. Accessed 14 Feb 2018

  • Byun S, Ruffini C, Mills JE, Douglas AC, Niang M, Stepchenkova S, Lee SK, Loutfi J, Lee JK, Atallah M, Blanton M (2009) Internet addiction: metasynthesis of 1996–2006 quantitative research. CyberPsychol Behav 12(2):203–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli V, Durkee T, Wasserman D, Hadlaczky G, Despalins R, Kramarz E, Kaess M (2013) The association between pathological internet use and comorbid psychopathology: a systematic review. Psychopathology 46(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000337971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark LS (2011) Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Commun Theory 21(4):323–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong G, Lu Q, Zhou H, Zhao X (2010) Impulse inhibition in people with internet addiction disorder: electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study. Neurosci Lett 485:138–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas AC, Mills JE, Niang M, Stepchenkova S, Byun S, Ruffini C et al (2008) Internet addiction: meta-synthesis of qualitative research for the decade 1996–2006. Comput Hum Behav 24(6):3027–3044

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling-Witte S, Frank ML, Lester D (2007) Shyness, internet use, and personality. CyberPsychol Behav 10:713–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Filler A, Kowatsch T, Haug S, Wahle F, Staake T, Fleisch E (2015) MobileCoach: a novel open source platform for the design of evidence-based, scalable and low-cost behavioral health interventions: overview and preliminary evaluation in the public health context. Paper presented at the wireless telecommunications symposium (WTS), New York, NY, USA

  • Goldberg LR (1992) The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychol Assess 4(1):26–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie E, Tee MY (2007) Excessive internet use: the role of personality, loneliness and social support networks in internet addiction. Aust J Emerg Technol Soc 5:34–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug S (2013) Mobile phone text messaging to reduce alcohol and tobacco use in young people—a narrative review. Smart Homecare Technol TeleHealth 1:11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug S, Schaub MP, Venzin V, Meyer C, John U (2013) Efficacy of a text message-based smoking cessation intervention for young people: a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 15(8):e171

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug S, Castro RP, Filler A, Kowatsch T, Fleisch E, Schaub MP (2014) Efficacy of an Internet and SMS-based integrated smoking cessation and alcohol intervention for smoking cessation in young people: study protocol of a two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 14(1):1140

    Google Scholar 

  • Heo J, Oh J, Subramanian SV, Kim Y, Kawachi I (2014) Addictive internet use among Korean adolescents: a national survey. PloS One 9(2):e87819

    Google Scholar 

  • Karim AKMR, Nigar N (2014) The internet addiction test: assessing its psychometric properties in Bangladeshi culture. Asian J Psychiatry 10:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim DI, Chung YJ, Lee EA, Kim DM, Cho YM (2008) Development of internet addiction proneness scale-short form (KS scale). Korea J Couns 9(4):1703–1722

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim HJ, Shin KH, Swanger N (2009) Burnout and engagement: a comparative analysis using the Big Five personality dimensions. Int J Hosp Manag 28(1):96–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh Y-S (2015) The Korean national policy for internet addiction. In: Internet addiction. Springer, Berlin, pp 219–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut R, Kiesler S, Boneva B, Cummings J, Helgeson V, Crawford A (2002) Internet paradox revisited. J Soc Issues 58(1):49–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuss DJ, Van Rooij AJ, Shorter GW, Griffiths MD, van de Mheen D (2013) Internet addiction in adolescents: prevalence and risk factors. Comput Hum Behav 29(5):1987–1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Laconi S, Rodgers RF, Chabrol H (2014) The measurement of internet addiction: a critical review of existing scales and their psychometric properties. Comput Hum Behav 41:190–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao X-h (2011) Analysis of the feasibility of exercise intervention in university students’ internet addiction on exercise psychology. Paper presented at the human health and biomedical engineering (HHBE), 2011 international conference, Jilin, China, pp 740–743

  • Lim J-S, Bae Y-K, Kim S-S (2004) A learning system for internet addiction prevention. Paper presented at the advanced learning technologies, 2004. Proceedings. IEEE international conference, Joensuu, Finland, pp 836–837

  • Liu Y-h, Dan Y-j (2009) A research on psychological attribution to internet addiction and intervention from exercise psychological perspective. J Beijing Sport Univ 8:017

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Gao XP, Osunde I et al (2010) Increased regional homogeneity in internet addiction disorder a resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. China Med J 123:1904–1908

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie CL, Guitton MJ (2013) Internet addiction assessment tools: dimensional structure and methodological status. Addiction 108(7):1207–1216

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerkerk GJ, Van Den Eijnden RJJM, Vermulst AA, Garretsen HFL (2009) The compulsive internet use scale (CIUS): some psychometric properties. CyberPsychol Behav 12(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesch GS (2009) Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. CyberPsychol Behav 12(4):387–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Montag C, Kirsch P, Sauer C, Markett S, Reuter M (2012) The role of the CHRNA4 gene in internet addiction: a case-control study. J Addict Med 6:191–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Morahan-Martin J (1999) The relationship between loneliness and internet use and abuse. CyberPsychol Behav 2:431–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller KW, Dreier M, Beutel ME, Duven E, Giralt S, Wölfling K (2016) A hidden type of internet addiction? Intense and addictive use of social networking sites in adolescents. Comput Hum Behav 55:172–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlikowski M, Nader IW, Burger C, Stieger S, Brand M (2014) Pathological internet use—it is a multidimensional and not a unidimensional construct. Addict Theory Res. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2013.793313. Accessed 14 Feb 2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu EJ, Choi KS, Seo JS, Nam BW (2004) The relationships of internet addiction, depression, and suicidal ideation in adolescents. J Korean Acad Nurs 34:102–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Salicetia F (2015) Internet addiction disorder (IAD). Proced Soc Behav Sci 191:1372–1376

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro NA, Goldsmith TD, Keck PE et al (2000) Psychiatric evaluation of individuals with problematic internet use. J Affect Disord 57:267–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin W (2015) Parental socialization of children’s internet use: a qualitative approach. New Media Soc 17(5):649–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Škařupová K, Ólafsson K, Blinka L (2015) Excessive internet use and its association with negative experiences: quasi-validation of a short scale in 25 European countries. Comput Hum Behav 53:118–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SJ (1996) Internet connectivity: addiction and dependency study. Penn State McNair J 3(Summer):137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufail MW, Khan R, Saleem M (2015) A link between internet addiction and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in Pakistani undergraduates. J Psikol Malays 29(2):71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Turel O, Mouttapa M, Donato E (2015) Preventing problematic internet use through video-based interventions: a theoretical model and empirical test. Behav Inf Technol 34(4):349–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Aa N, Overbeek G, Engels RCME, Scholte RHJ, Meerkerk G-J, Van den Eijnden RJJ, M. (2009) Daily and compulsive internet use and well-being in adolescence: a diathesis-stress model based on big five personality traits. J Youth Adolesc 38(6):765

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermulst AA, Gerris JRM (2006) QBF. Quick Big Five persoonlijkheids-vragenlijst. Handleiding [Quick Big Five personality questionnaire. Guideline]. LDC, Leeuwarden

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartberg L, Petersen K-U, Kammerl R, Rosenkranz M, Thomasius R (2014) Psychometric validation of a German version of the compulsive internet use scale. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 17(2):99–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Weijia S, Wenyong W (2013) A method-based on real-name system about internet addiction assessment and control. Paper presented at the computer science and network technology (ICCSNT), 2013 3rd international conference, Dalian, China, pp 306–309

  • Whitty M (2005) The realness of cybercheating. Soc Sci Comput Rev 23:57–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Widyanto L, McMurran M (2004) The psychometric properties of the internet addiction test. CyberPsychol Behav 7(4):443–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Wölfling K, Müller K, Beutel M (2010) Diagnostic measures: scale for the Assessment of Internet and Computer game Addiction (AICA-S). In: Mücken D, Teske A, Rehbein F, te Wildt B (eds) Prevention, diagnostics, and therapy of computer game additcion. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich, pp 212–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiuqin H, Huimin Z, Mengchen L, Jinan W, Ying Z, Ran T (2010) Mental health, personality, and parental rearing styles of adolescents with Internet addiction disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 13(4):401–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen JY, Ko CH, Yen CF et al (2007) The comorbid psychiatric symptoms of internet addiction: attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, social phobia, and hostility. J Adolesc Health 41:93–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn S (2008) Parental influence and teens’ attitude toward online privacy protection. J Consum Aff 42(3):362–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Young KS (1996) Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. In: Paper presented at the 104th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, 11 Aug 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Young KS (1998) Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychol Behav 1(3):237–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Young KS (1999) The research and controversy surrounding internet addiction. CyberPsychol Behav 2(5):381. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1999.2.381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young KS (2004) Internet addiction: a new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. Am Behav Sci 48(4):402–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Young KS (2015) The evolution of Internet addiction disorder. In: Montag C, Reuter M (eds) Internet addiction. Springer, Cham, pp 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan K, Qin W, Liu Y, Tian J (2011) Internet addiction: neuroimaging findings. Commun Integr Biol 4(6):637–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Lin FC, Du YS et al (2011) Gray matter abnormalities in internet addiction: a voxel-based morphometry study. Eur J Radiol 79:92–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Zochil ML (2015) A literature review of internet addiction with a focus on university students. J Austr N Z Stud Serv Assoc (46):13–19

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Mirza, F., Narayanan, A. et al. Is it possible to cure Internet addiction with the Internet?. AI & Soc 35, 245–255 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0858-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0858-0

Keywords

Navigation