Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Jaime Garretón’s cybernetic theory of the city and its system: a missing link in contemporary urban theory

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Garretón’s “Una teoría cibernética de la ciudad y su sistema” (A cybernetic theory of the city and its system) was published in 1975 by Nueva Visión publishing house in Buenos Aires, a moment when the seminal criticisms against the modernist urban theory of the sixties led by Team 10 were becoming concrete proposals for updating and eventually overcoming its shortcomings. Yet, despite remaining unpublished in English and hence relatively unknown worldwide, few publications in the field compare in scope to Garreton’s cybernetic theory. The reason is straightforward: like Shannon’s mathematical theory, this work amounts to a general theory of the city. Thoroughly informed by system thinking, whose trademark rule of thumb was described by Luhmann as “drawing distinctions” to guarantee the autopoiesis of a determined system, Garretón’s chief objective was to draw distinctions that would guarantee the autopoiesis of the urban system. In doing so, he discovered three fundamental urban laws, namely: the law of urban communication, the law of urban attraction, and the law of urban circulation. This, in turn, allowed him to clearly distinguish a universe that had thus far remained undetected by urbanists and that he called the non-city Universe: the human-made universe that nevertheless does not belong in the urban universe. This paper argues that this allowed him to rediscover and update the ancient and lost art of city-making: not an art of making buildings, roads, and infrastructure in general but rather, the art of building, knitting, fostering, and sustaining communities and whole societies by means of or with the aid of buildings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source: Garretón (1975), p. 18

Fig. 3

Source: Garretón (1975), p. 19

Fig. 4

Source: Garretón (1975)

Fig. 5

Source: Fanny Fay-Sallois, Desclee de Brouwer (2002)

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Due to its idiosyncratic character, it is worth mentioning that this took place seventeen years before Marc Auge introduced the notion of Non-Place into mainstream academy.

  2. With the exception of Ludwig von Bertalanfy, neither second order cyberneticians nor phenomenologists have paid open homage to Goethe.

  3. Autopoiesis can be understood as the circular or recursive elemental operation that allows and makes possible the existence of any system for a certain amount of time without succumbing to the entropic effects of gravity.

  4. Where ‘x’ is the maximum distance for face-to-face communication to be possible.

  5. Adapted idealized noiseless model after Claude Shannon’s mathematical model.

  6. They are all linked and coordinated by the Communicative System, a system to which Garretón devoted an in-depth study, crucial for a clear distinction between direct (including artistic communication) and mediated communication.

  7. The landscape that has emerged along London’s M25 ring motorway and its techno-corridors between cities, such as the M11 and M4 are good and highly differentiated contemporary examples.

References

  • Araneda C, Gatica B (2017) Mapping the crowd from within. An immersive strategy for the recording and management of visual information in the shape of people as a complement to syntactic spatial analysis. In: Proceedings of the ninth international space syntax symposium, 77, pp 1–17

  • Garretón J (1975) Una teoría cibernética de la ciudad y sus sistema. Nueva Visión, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Garretón J (1979) Hacia y desde la ciudad. Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago

    Google Scholar 

  • Garretón J (1985) De ciudades y sistemas de ciudades. ODEPLAN, Santiago

    Google Scholar 

  • Garretón J (1993) La no-ciudad, complemento de la ciudad. Arquitecturas del Sur 20.

  • Garretón J (2000) Theory of the city and the non-city. (Unpublished)

  • Garretón J (2002) Espacio, Devenir y el Rescate del Tiempo. CESOC, Santiago

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl J (2001) Life between buildings. Using Public Space. The Danish Architectural Press, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl J (2010) Cities for people. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl J (2013) How to study public life. Island Press, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall ET (1959) The silent language. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall ET (1969) The hidden dimension. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B (1996) Space is the machine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B, Hanson J (1984) The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B et al (1993) Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environ Plann B Plann Des 20(1):29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. The failure of town planning. Penguin Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee N (ed) (2019) The transhumanism handbook. Springer Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (2000) Art as a social system. Stanford University Press, California

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maertens H (1877) Der optische-maassstab oder die theorie und praxis des ästhetischen sehens in den bildenden künsten. Auf grund der lehre der physiologischen optik. Cohen, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana H, Varela F (1979) Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratti C (2004) Space syntax. Some inconsistencies. Environ Plan B Plan Des 31(4):487–499. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seamon D, Zajonc A (eds) (1998) Goethe’s way of science. A phenomenology of nature. SUNY, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon C (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Illinois

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Soren B, Glanville R (eds) (2003) Heinz Von Foerster 1911–2002 (cybernetics & human knowing). Imprint Academic, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Soria y Puig (ed) (1999) Cerda. The five bases of the general theory of urbanization. Gyngko Press, Barcelona

  • Varela F, Rosch E, Thompson E (1993) The embodied mind. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener N (1950) The human use of human beings. Da Capo Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Araneda.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Araneda, C. Jaime Garretón’s cybernetic theory of the city and its system: a missing link in contemporary urban theory. AI & Soc 37, 1179–1189 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01349-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01349-z

Keywords

Navigation