Skip to main content
Log in

Forcing notions in inner models

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a partial order \({\mathbb{P}}\) preserving stationary subsets of ω 1 and forcing that every partial order in the ground model V that collapses a sufficiently large ordinal to ω 1 over V also collapses ω 1 over \({V^{\mathbb{P}}}\) . The proof of this uses a coding of reals into ordinals by proper forcing discovered by Justin Moore and a symmetric extension of the universe in which the Axiom of Choice fails. Also, using one feature of the proof of the above result together with an argument involving the stationary tower it is shown that sometimes, after adding one Cohen real c, there are, for every real a in V[c], sets A and B such that c is Cohen generic over both L[A] and L[B] but a is constructible from A together with B.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feng Q., Jech T.: Projective stationary sets and a strong reflection principle. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 58(3), 271–283 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Foreman M., Magidor M.: Large cardinals and definable counterexamples to the continuum hypothesis. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 76, 47–97 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Foreman M., Magidor M., Shelah S.: Martin’s maximum, saturated ideals, and non-regular ultrafilters. Part I. Ann. Math. 127, 1–47 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Jech T.: The Axiom of Choice. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Jech T.: Set Theory The Third Millenium Edition. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Larson, P.: The stationary tower. Notes on a course. In: Woodin, W.H. (ed.) University Lecture Series, 32. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2004)

  7. Moore, J.: Set mapping reflection, J. Math. Logic 5 (2005), no. 1, 87–97. With a correction: Erratum: “Set mapping reflection”, J. Math. Logic 5(2):299

    Google Scholar 

  8. Veličković B.: Forcing axioms and stationary sets. Adv. Math. 94, 256–284 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Woodin, H.: The Axiom of Determinacy Forcing Axioms and the Nonstationary Ideal, De Gruyter Series in Logic and its Applications, Number 1. Berlin, New York (1999)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Asperó.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asperó, D. Forcing notions in inner models. Arch. Math. Logic 48, 643–651 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-009-0141-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-009-0141-7

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation