Skip to main content
Log in

Limit computable integer parts

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 28 February 2015

Abstract

Let R be a real closed field. An integer part I for R is a discretely ordered subring such that for every \({r \in R}\) , there exists an \({i \in I}\) so that ir < i + 1. Mourgues and Ressayre (J Symb Logic 58:641–647, 1993) showed that every real closed field has an integer part. The procedure of Mourgues and Ressayre appears to be quite complicated. We would like to know whether there is a simple procedure, yielding an integer part that is \({\Delta^0_2(R)}\) —limit computable relative to R. We show that there is a maximal Z-ring \({I \subseteq R}\) which is \({\Delta^0_2(R)}\) . However, this I may not be an integer part for R. By a result of Wilkie (Logic Colloquium ’77), any Z-ring can be extended to an integer part for some real closed field. Using Wilkie’s ideas, we produce a real closed field R with a Z-ring \({I \subseteq R}\) such that I does not extend to an integer part for R. For a computable real closed field, we do not know whether there must be an integer part in the class \({\Delta^0_2}\) . We know that certain subclasses of \({\Delta^0_2}\) are not sufficient. We show that for each \({n \in \omega}\) , there is a computable real closed field with no n-c.e. integer part. In fact, there is a computable real closed field with no n-c.e. integer part for any n.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asatryan, G.: On ordered fields with infinitely many integer parts, preprint (2008)

  2. Ash C.J., Knight J.F.: Computable Structures and the Hyperarithmetical Hierarchy, Stud. Logic Found. Math, vol. 144. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berarducci A., Otero M.: A recursive nonstandard model of normal Open induction. J. Symb. Logic 61, 1228–1241 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. D’Aquino P., Knight J.F., Starchenko S.: Real closed fields and models of Peano arithmetic. J. Symb. Logic 75, 1–11 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ershov, Yu.: A certain hierarchy of sets I, II, III, algebra and Logic, #1, vol. 7, pp. 47–74 (1968); #4, vol. 7, pp.15–47 (1968); #1, vol. 9, pp. 34–51 (1970)

  6. Knight, J.F., Lange, K.: Countable real closed fields and developments of bounded length. preprint (2011)

  7. Kuhlmann S.: Ordered Exponential Fields, Fields Insititute Monographs. AMS, Providence, RI (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moniri M., Moniri M.: Some weak fragments of HA and certain closure properties. J. Symb. Log 67, 91–103 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Mourgues M.H., Ressayre J.-P.: Every real closed field has an integer part. J. Symb. Logic 58, 641–647 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Shepherdson J.: A non-standard model for the free variable fragment of number theory. Bulletin de l’Academie Polonaise Des Sciences 12, 79–86 (1964)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Tarski, A.: A decision method for elementary algebra and geometry, US Air Force Project Rand Report R-109, (1948). Republished: Tarski, A. A Decision Method for Elementary Algebra and Geometry, 2nd edn., University of California Press, (1951)

  12. Wilkie, A.: Some results and problems on weak systems of arithmetic. In: Logic Colloquium ’77. North Holland (1978)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Lange.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00153-015-0418-y.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

D’Aquino, P., Knight, J. & Lange, K. Limit computable integer parts. Arch. Math. Logic 50, 681–695 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-011-0241-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-011-0241-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation