Skip to main content
Log in

On a variant of Rado’s selection lemma and its equivalence with the Boolean prime ideal theorem

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We establish that, in ZF (i.e., Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory minus the Axiom of Choice AC), the statement

RLT: Given a set I and a non-empty set \({\mathcal{F}}\) of non-empty elementary closed subsets of 2I satisfying the fip, if \({\mathcal{F}}\) has a choice function, then \({\bigcap\mathcal{F} \ne \emptyset}\),

which was introduced in Morillon (Arch Math Logic 51(7–8):739–749, 2012), is equivalent to the Boolean Prime Ideal Theorem (see Sect. 1 for terminology). The result provides, on one hand, an affirmative answer to Morillon’s corresponding question in Morillon (2012) and, on the other hand, a negative answer—in the setting of ZFA (i.e., ZF with the axiom of extensionality weakened to permit the existence of atoms)—to the question in Morillon (2012) of whether RLT is equivalent to Rado’s selection lemma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gottschalk W.: Choice functions and Tychonoff’s theorem. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2, 172 (1951)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Hall E.J., Keremedis K., Tachtsis E.: The existence of free ultrafilters on ω does not imply the extension of filters on ω to ultrafilters. Math. Logic Q. 59(4–5), 258–267 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Howard P.E.: Rado’s selection lemma does not imply the boolean prime ideal theorem. Zeitschr. f. math. Logik und Grundlagen d. Math. 30, 129–132 (1984)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Howard, P., Rubin, J.E.: Consequences of the Axiom of Choice. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 59. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1998). (http://www.consequences.emich.edu/conseq.htm is the website of the AC project)

  5. Jech, T.: The Axiom of Choice, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 75. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1973)

  6. Keremedis K.: Tychonoff products of two-element sets and some weakenings of the boolean prime ideal theorem. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Math. 53(4), 349–359 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Morillon M.: Some consequences of Rado’s selection lemma. Arch. Math. Logic 51(7–8), 739–749 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Mycielski J.: Two remarks on Tychonoff’s product Theorem. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. XII(8),439–441 (1964)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Rado R.: Axiomatic treatment of rank in infinite sets. Can. J. Math. 1, 337–343 (1949)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Rav Y.: Variants of Rado’s selection lemma and their applications. Math. Nachr. 79, 145–165 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Rice N.: A general selection principle with applications in analysis and algebra. Can. Math. Bull. 11, 573–584 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolk E.S.: On theorems of Tychonoff, Alexander, and R. Rado. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 18, 113–115 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleftherios Tachtsis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Howard, P., Tachtsis, E. On a variant of Rado’s selection lemma and its equivalence with the Boolean prime ideal theorem. Arch. Math. Logic 53, 825–833 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-014-0390-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-014-0390-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation