Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comments on: Hierarchical Inference for genome-wide association studies: a view on methodology with software by Paulo C. Rodrigues and Vanda M. Lourenço

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Rejoinder to this article was published on 08 January 2020

The Original Article was published on 06 January 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Buzdugan L, Kalisch M, Navarro A, Schunk D, Fehr E, Bühlmann P (2016) Assessing statistical significance in multivariable genome wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 32:1990–2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgington ES (1972) An additive method for combining probability values from independent experiments. J Psychol 80:351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1934) Statistical methods for research workers, 4th edn. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heard NA, Rubin-Delanchy P (2018) Choosing between methods of combining p-values. Biometrika 105:239–246

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Klasen J, Barbez E, Meier L et al (2016) A multi-marker association method for genome-wide association studies without the need for population structure correction. Nat Commun 7:13299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinshausen N (2008) Hierarchical testing of variable importance. Biometrika 95:265–278

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mudholkar G, George E (1979) The logit method for combining probabilities. In: Rustagi J (ed) Symposium on optimizing methods in statistics. Academic Press, New York, pp 345–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K (1933) On a method of determining whether a sample of size n supposed to have been drawn from a parent population having a known probability integral has probably been drawn at random. Biometrika 25:379–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson CB, Bogomolov M, Benjamini Y, Sabatti C (2016) Many phenotypes without many false discoveries: error controlling strategies for multitrait association studies. Genet Epidemiol 40:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil

    Paulo C. Rodrigues

  2. NOVA University of Lisbon and CMA, Lisbon, Portugal

    Vanda M. Lourenço

Authors
  1. Paulo C. Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vanda M. Lourenço
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo C. Rodrigues.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodrigues, P.C., Lourenço, V.M. Comments on: Hierarchical Inference for genome-wide association studies: a view on methodology with software by Paulo C. Rodrigues and Vanda M. Lourenço. Comput Stat 35, 57–58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-019-00941-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-019-00941-8

Search

Navigation