Abstract
We study the behavior of the random arrival rule in claims problems with a large number of claimants. We assume that the amount to divide is not too “small” compared with total claims, and each claim is not too “large” compared with any other positive claims. Then, the random arrival rule behaves like the proportional rule as the number of claimants increases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aumann R, Maschler M (1985) Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud. J Econ Theory 36:195–213
Chun Y (1988) The proportional solution for rights problems. Math Soc Sci 15:231–246
Chun Y (1999) Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems. Int J Game Theory 28:511–520
Chun Y, Thomson W (2005) Convergence under replication of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims. Games Econ Behav 50:129–142
Debreu G, Scarf H (1963) A limit theorem on the core of an economy. Int Econ Rev 4:235–246
Moulin H (1987) Equal or proportional division of a surplus and other methods. Int J Game Theory 16: 161–186
O’Neill B (1982) A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Math Soc Sci 2:345–371
Shapley LS (1953) A value for n-person games. In: Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (eds) Contributions to the theory of games II, annals of mathematics studies no 28. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 307–317
Thomson W (1988) A study of choice correspondences in economies with a variable number of agents. J Econ Theory 46:237–254
Thomson W (2003) Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey. Math Soc Sci 45:249–297
Young HP (1987) On dividing an amount according to individual claims or liabilities. Math Oper Res 12:398–414
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We are grateful to Yuki Funaki, William Thomson, and three referees for their comments. This work was supported by the Brain Korea 21 Project in 2003
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chun, Y., Lee, J. On the convergence of the random arrival rule in large claims problems. Int J Game Theory 36, 259–273 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-007-0075-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-007-0075-4