Abstract
Interconnecting distinct electricity markets by adding a new transmission line affects the outcomes in these markets in a complicated way when there is uncertainty in demand or participant behaviour. We use market distribution functions to examine the effects of interconnection using a single transmission line under the assumption that this line has a differentiable loss function and agents in each of the interconnected markets do not change their behaviour in response to the interconnection. We also show how the case with capacity constraints on flows can be represented with appropriately formulated loss functions. We give analytical formulae for computing market outcomes when the uncertain events in the markets being connected are statistically independent, and show by example how to compute these outcomes when these events are correlated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvey T., Goodwin D., Ma X., Streiffert D., Sun D. (1998) A security-constrained bid-clearing system for the New Zealand wholesale electricity market. IEEE Trans.Power Syst. 13, 340–346 (1998)
Anderson E.J., Philpott A.B.: Optimal offer construction in electricity markets. Math. Oper. Res., 27, 82–100
Anderson, E.J., Philpott, A.B.: Using supply functions for offering generation into an electricity market. Oper. Res, 50 477–489
Baldick R., Grant R., Kahn E. (2004) Theory and application of linear supply function equilibrium in electricity markets. J. Regul. Econ. 25, 143–167
Berry C.A., Hobbs B.F., Meroney W.A., O’Neill R.P., Stewart W.R. (1999) Understanding how market power can arise in network competition: a game theoretic approach. Util. Policy 8, 139–158
Borenstein S., Bushnell J., Stoft S. (2000) The competitive effects of transmission capacity in a deregulated electricity industy. RAND J. Econ 31, 294–325
Cardell J.B., Hitt C.C., Hogan W.W. (1997) Market power and strategic interaction in electricity networks.Resour. Energy Econ. 19, 109–137
Chao H., Peck S. (1996) A market mechanism for electric power transmission. J. Regul. Econo. 10, 25–59
Day C.J., Hobbs B.F., Pang J.-S. (2002) Oligopolistic competition in power networks: A conjectured supply function approach. IEEE Transact. Power Syst. 17, 597–607
Green R., Newbery D. (1992) Competition in the British electric spot market. J. Polit. Econ 100, 929–953
Hobbs B.F. (2001) Linear complementarity models of Nash–Cournot competition in bilateral and POOLCO power markets. IEEE Transact. Power Syst 16, 194–202
Joskow, P.L., Tirole, J.: Merchant transmission investment. NBER Working Paper 9534 (2003)
Klemperer P.R., Meyer M.A. (1989) Supply function equilibria. Econometrica 57, 1243–1277
Wei J-Y, Smeers Y. (1999) Spatial oligopolistic electricity market models with Cournot generators and regulated transmission prices. Oper. Res 47, 102–112
Wilson R. (2002) Architecture of power markets. Econometrica 70, 1299–1340
Wolak, F.A.: Market design and price behaviour in restructured electricity markets: an international comparison. POWER report PWP-051, UCEI, Berkeley (1997)
Wood A.J., Wollenberg B.F. (1996) Power Generation, Operation and Control, 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, E.J., Philpott, A.B. & Xu, H. Modelling the effects of interconnection between electricity markets subject to uncertainty. Math Meth Oper Res 65, 1–26 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-006-0061-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-006-0061-9