Abstract
We study the classical real option problem in which an agent faces the decision if and when to invest optimally into a project. The investment is assumed to be irreversible. This problem has been studied by Myers and Majd (Adv Futures Options Res 4:1–21, 1990) for the case of a complete market, in which the risk can be perfectly hedged with an appropriate spanning asset, by McDonald and Siegel (Q J Econ, 101:707–727, 1986), who include the incomplete case but assume that the agent is risk neutral toward idiosyncratic risk, and later by Henderson (Valuing the option to invest in an incomplete market, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=569865, 2006) who studies the incomplete case with risk aversion toward idiosyncratic risk under the assumption that the project value follows a geometric Brownian motion. We take up Henderson’s utility based approach but assume as suggested by Dixit and Pindyck (Investment under uncertainty, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994) as well as others, that the project value follows a geometric mean reverting process. The mean reverting structure of the project value process makes our model richer and economically more meaningful. By using techniques from optimal control theory we derive analytic expressions for the value and the optimal exercise time of the option to invest.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1972) Handbook of mathematical functions. Dover Books on Advanced Mathematics
Alos E, Ewald C-O (2007) Malliavin differentiability of the Heston volatility and applications to option pricing. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=986316
Bjoerk T (2004) Arbitrage theory in continuous time. Oxford University Press,
Dixit A, Pindyck R (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press,
Ewald C-O (2005) Local volatility in the Heston stochastic volatility model. J Appl Math Stochastic Anal 2005(3): 307–322
Ewald C-O (2005) Optimal logarithmic utility and optimal portfolios for an insider in a stochastic volatility model. Int J Theor Appl Financ 8(3): 301–319
Ewald C-O, Zhang A (2006) A new technique for calibrating stochastic volatility models: the Malliavin gradient method. Quantitat Financ 6(2): 147–158
Ewald C-O, Yang ZJ (2007) Geometric mean reversion: formulas for the equilibrium density and analytic moment matching (preprint). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=999561
Epstein M, Schonbucher W, Wilmott P (1998) The valuation of a firm advertising optimally. Q Rev Econ Financ 38(2): 149–
Fleming WH, Rishel RW (1975) Deterministic and stochastic optimal control. Appl Math Springer
Henderson V (2002) Valuation of claims on non-tradable asset using utility maximization. Math Financ 12(4): 351–
Henderson V (2006) Valuing the option to invest in an incomplete market. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=569865
Henderson V, Hobson D (2002) Real options with constant relative risk aversion. J Econ Dyn Control 27(2): 329–
Henderson V, Hobson D (2007) Horizon unbiased utility functions. Stochastic Processes Appl 117(11): 1621–
Hobson D (2003) Real options, non-tradable assets and utility indifference prices. University of Bath, UK (preprint)
Metcalf G, Hasset K (1995) Investment under alternative return assumptions comparing random walk and mean reversion. J Econ Dyn Control 19: 1471–
McDonald R, Siegel DR (1986) The value of waiting to invest. Q J Econ 101: 707–
Myers SC (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financ Econ 5(2): 147–
Myers SC, Majd S (1990) Abandonment value and project life. Adv Futures Options Res 4: 1–
Oksendal B, Sulem A (2007) Applied stochastic control of jump diffusions. Springer, Berlin
Pindyck S (2000) Irreversibilities and the timing of environmental policy. Resour Energy Econ 22: 233–
Yang ZJ, Huang LH (2005) Maximizing expected utility from terminal wealth under the case of different rates between borrowing and saving. Chin J Manage Sci 8(5): 50–
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ewald, CO., Yang, Z. Utility based pricing and exercising of real options under geometric mean reversion and risk aversion toward idiosyncratic risk. Math Meth Oper Res 68, 97–123 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-007-0190-9
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-007-0190-9