Skip to main content
Log in

Consistency results on Newmark methods for dynamical contact problems

  • Published:
Numerische Mathematik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper considers the time integration of frictionless dynamical contact problems between viscoelastic bodies in the frame of the Signorini condition. Among the numerical integrators, interest focuses on the classical Newmark method, the improved energy dissipative version due to Kane et al., and the contact-stabilized Newmark method recently suggested by Deuflhard et al. In the absence of contact, any such variant is equivalent to the Störmer–Verlet scheme, which is well-known to have consistency order 2. In the presence of contact, however, the classical approach to discretization errors would not show consistency at all because of the discontinuity at the contact. Surprisingly, the question of consistency in the constrained situation has not been solved yet. The present paper fills this gap by means of a novel proof technique using specific norms based on earlier perturbation results due to the authors. The corresponding estimation of the local discretization error requires the bounded total variation of the solution. The results have consequences for the construction of an adaptive timestep control, which will be worked out subsequently in a forthcoming paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams R.A., Fournier J.J.F.: Sobolev Spaces. Academic Press, New York (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn, J., Stewart, D.E.: Dynamic frictionless contact in linear viscoelasticity. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 1–29 (2008)

  3. Deuflhard P., Bornemann F.: Scientific Computing with Ordinary Differential Equations. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Deuflhard P., Krause R., Ertel S.: A contact-stabilized Newmark method for dynamical contact problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 73(9), 1274–1290 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Duvaut G., Lions J.L.: Inequalities in Mechanics and Physics. Springer, Berlin (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Eck, C.: Existenz und Regularität der Lösungen für Kontaktprobleme mit Reibung. PhD thesis, Universität Stuttgart (1996)

  7. Ekeland I., Temam R.: Convex Analysis and Variational Problems. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hairer, E., Lubich, C., Wanner, G.: Geometric Numerical Integration. Structure–Preserving Algorithms for Ordinary Differential Equations. Computational Mathematics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2006)

  9. Kane C., Repetto E.A., Ortiz M., Marsden J.E.: Finite element analysis of nonsmooth contact. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 180, 1–26 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Khenous H.B., Laborde P., Renard Y.: On the discretization of contact problems in elastodynamics. Lect. Notes Appl. Comp. Mech. 27(5), 31–38 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kikuchi N., Oden J.T.: Contact Problems in Elasticity. SIAM, Philadelphia (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Klapproth C., Deuflhard P., Schiela A.: A perturbation result for dynamical contact problems. Numer. Math. Theor. Meth. Appl. 2(3), 237–257 (2009)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kornhuber R., Krause R.: Adaptive multilevel methods for Signorini’s problem in linear elasticity. Comput. Vis. Sci. 4, 9–20 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kornhuber R., Krause R., Sander O., Deuflhard P., Ertel S.: A monotone multigrid solver for two body contact problems in biomechanics. Comput. Vis. Sci. 11(1), 3–15 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Laursen T.A.: Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Panagiotopoulos P.D.: Inequality Problems in Mechanics and Applications. Birkhäuser, Basel (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Schechter E.: Handbook of Analysis and Its Foundations. Academic Press, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zeidler E.: Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Applications II A/B. Springer, Berlin (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corinna Klapproth.

Additional information

Supported by the DFG Research Center Matheon, “Mathematics for key technologies: modelling, simulation, and optimization of real-world processes”, Berlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klapproth, C., Schiela, A. & Deuflhard, P. Consistency results on Newmark methods for dynamical contact problems. Numer. Math. 116, 65–94 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-010-0300-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-010-0300-0

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation