Skip to main content
Log in

Meinungsanalyse in Onlinenetzwerken mittels Schwarmintelligenz

  • HAUPTBEITRAG
  • SCHWARMINTELLIGENZ
  • Published:
Informatik-Spektrum Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Im Internet bilden sich immer mehr Onlinecommunities, in denen Mitglieder Freundschaften pflegen, Interessengruppen beitreten und miteinander diskutieren. Die Vernetzung versetzt die Communitymitglieder in die Lage, sich ohne zentrale Steuerung selbstständig durch einfache Kommunikation und Interaktion zu organisieren. Das kollektiv intelligente Verhalten führt dazu, dass Meinungen nicht mehr hauptsächlich durch Massenmedien sondern durch Netzwerkbeziehungen geprägt werden. Für Unternehmen stellt die Analyse der Meinungsbildung in Netzwerken ein mächtiges Marktforschungsinstrument dar. In diesem Beitrag wird ein Ansatz vorgestellt, der es ermöglicht, durch die Kombination von Methoden aus den Bereichen Text-Mining und Schwarmintelligenz Meinungen einzelner Communitymitglieder auf Basis ihrer Netzwerkbeziehungen zu erklären und zu prognostizieren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Abraham A, Grosan C, Ramos V (2006) Swarm Intelligence in Data Mining. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Adamic L, Buyukkokten O, Adar E (2003) A social network caught in the Web. First Monday 8(6)

  3. Backstrom L, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Lan X (2006) Group Formation in Large Social Networks: Membership, Growth, and Evolution. In: Proc. of the Twelfth Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Philadelphia, ACM, 2006

  4. Blum C, Li X (2008) Swarm Intelligence in Optimization. In: Blum C, Merkle D (eds) Swarm Intelligence – Introduction and Applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 43–86

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonabeau E, Dorgio M, Theraulaz G (1999) Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems. Oxford University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Brandes U (2001) A Faster Algorithm for Betweenness Centrality. J Math Sociol 25:163–177

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu Rev Psychol 55:591–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support vector networks. Mach Learn 20:273–297

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dave K, Lawrence S, Pennock D (2003) Mining the Peanut Gallery: Opinion Extraction and Semantic Classification of Product Reviews. In: Proc. of the Twelfth Int. Conf. on World Wide Web, Budapest, ACM Press 2003, pp 519–528

  10. Deutsch M, Gerard HB (1955) A study of normative and informative social influences upon individual judgment. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 51:629–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dwyer C, Hiltz S, Passerini K (2007) Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace. In: Proc. of the Thirteenth American Conf. on Information Systems, Colorado 2007

  12. Glance M, Hurst M, Nigam K, Siegler M, Stockton R, Tomokiyo T (2005) Analyzing online discussion for marketing intelligence. In: Proc. of the 14th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web, Chib, 2005, pp 1172–1173

  13. Goldstone RL, Jones A, Roberts ME (2006) Group path formation. IEEE Transact Syst Man Cybernetics 36:611–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen R (2006) Performing Feature Selection with ACO. In: Swarm Intelligence in Data Mining. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keller EB, Berry J (2003) The Influentials. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kolbitsch J, Maurer H (2006) The transformation of the web: how emerging communities shape the information we consume. J Univers Comput Sci 12(2):187–121

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lampe C, Ellison N, Steinfield C (2007) A Familiar Face(book): Profile Elements as Signals in an Online Social Network. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, ACM 2007

  18. Liu B, Hu M, Cheng J (2005) Opinion Observer: Analyzing and Comparing Opinions on the Web. In: Proc. of the 14th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web, New York, ACM Press, pp 342–351

  19. Martens D (2006) Ants constructing rule-based classifiers. Stud Comput Intell 34:21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martens D, Li X (2008) Swarm Intelligence in Optimization, Swarm Intelligence – Introduction and Applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 21–44

    Google Scholar 

  21. Morik K, Worbel S, Joachims T (2000) Maschinelles Lernen und Data Mining. In: Görz G, Rollinger C, Schneeberger J (Hrsg) Handbuch der Künstlichen Intelligenz, 3. Aufl. Oldenbourg, München, S 517–598

  22. Parpinelli R, Lopes H, Freitas A (2002) Data mining with an ant colony optimization algorithm. IEEE Transact Evol Comput 6(4):321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Palotai Z, Mandusitz S, Lörincz A (2006) Computer study of the evolution of “news foragers” on the Internet. In: Swarm Intelligence in Data Mining. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  24. Popescu A, Etzioni O (2007) Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. In: Kao A, Poteet S (eds) Natural Language Processing and Text Mining. Springer, London, pp 9–28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramos V, Abraham A (2003) Web Usage Mining Using Artificial Ant Colony Clustering and Genetic Programming. In: Proc. of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Canberra 2003

  26. Scott J (2000) Social Network Analysis – A Handbook. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Watts DJ, Dodds PS (2007) Influentials, networks and public opinion formation. J Consumer Res 34:441–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Weiss S, Indurkhya N, Zhang T, Damerau F (2005) Text Mining – Predictive Methods for Analyzing unstructured Information. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Wippermann P, Schelske A (2006) Schwarm-Intelligenz – Vernetz mich. In: Lippert W (Hrsg) Jahrbuch Annual Multimedia. Metropolitan, München

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolin Kaiser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaiser, C., Kröckel, J. Meinungsanalyse in Onlinenetzwerken mittels Schwarmintelligenz. Informatik Spektrum 34, 355–363 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-010-0444-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-010-0444-4

Navigation