Abstract
The notion of informational basis in social choice can be broadened so as to cover not only the standard notions related to interpersonal utility comparisons, but also information about utilities or preferences at (ir)relevant alternatives, non-utility features of alternatives, personal responsibility, unconcerned subpopulations, and feasibility constraints. This paper proposes a unified conceptual framework for all these notions, and analyzes the kind of information retained in each case. This new framework yields a deeper understanding of the difficulties and possibilities of social choice. New welfarism theorems are also obtained.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I am indebted to W. Bossert, W. Gaertner, F. Gaspart, L. Gevers, N. Gravel, S. Kolm, M. Le Breton, Ph. Mongin, P. Hammond, K. Suzumura, K. Tadenuma, A. Trannoy and J. Weymark for many conversations on topics related to this paper. I have benefited from reactions of the audience at the conference in honor of Louis Gevers, Namur 1999, and at a seminar at the LSE, and from comments by two referees and the editor, F. Maniquet. None of them is responsible for the shortcomings of the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fleurbaey, M. On the informational basis of social choice. Soc Choice Welfare 21, 347–384 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-003-0263-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-003-0263-5