Skip to main content
Log in

Market Segmentation Using Brand Strategy Research: Bayesian Inference with Respect to Mixtures of Log-Linear Models

  • Published:
Journal of Classification Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a Bayesian model based clustering approach for dichotomous item responses that deals with issues often encountered in model based clustering like missing data, large data sets and within cluster dependencies. The approach proposed will be illustrated using an example concerning Brand Strategy Research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AGRESTI, A. (2002), Categorical Data Analysis, New York: John Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • BANFIELD, J.D., and RAFTERY, A.E. (1993), “Model-based Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Clustering”, Biometrics 49, 803–821.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • BENSMAIL, H., CELEUX, G., RAFTERY, A.E., and ROBERT, C.P. (1997), “Inference in Model Based Clustering”, Statistics and Computing 7, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRETHOUWER, W., LAMME, A., RODENBURG, J., DU CHATINIER, H., and SMIT, M. (1995), Quality Planning toegepast (Dutch), Amsterdam: Janssen Offset.

    Google Scholar 

  • CALLEBAUT, J., JANSSENS, M., OP DE BEECK, D., LORRÉ, D., and HENDRICKX, H. (1999), Motivational Marketing Research Revisited, Leuven: Garant Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • COWLES, M.K., and CARLIN, B.P. (1996), “Markov Chain Monte Carlo Convergence Diagnostics: A Comparative Review”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 91, 833–904.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • DEMPSTER,A.P., LAIRD,N.M., and RUBIN,D.B. (1977), “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM algorithm”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39, 1–38.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • EVERITT, B.S. (1988), “AMonte Carlo Investigation of the Likelihood Ratio Test for Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis”, Multivariate Behavioral Research 23, 531–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FRALEY, C., and RAFTERY,A.E. (1998), “HowMany Clusters? Which ClusteringMethod? Answers via Model-Based Cluster Analysis”, Technical Report No. 329, Department of Statistics, University of Washington.

  • GELMAN, A., MENG, X., and STERN, H.S. (1996), “Posterior Predictive Assessment of Model Fitness via Realized Discrepancies (With Discussion)”, Statistica Sinica 6, 733–807.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • GELMAN, A., CARLIN,J.B., STERN, H.S., and RUBIN, D.B. (2000), Bayesian Data Analysis, London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAGENAARS, J.A. (1988), “Latent Structure Models with Direct Effects between Indicators: Local Dependence Models”, Sociological Methods and Research 16, 379–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAGENAARS, J.A., and MCCUTHEON, A.L. (2002), Applied Latent Class Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • HAIR, J.F., ANDERSON, R.E., TATHAM, R.L., and BLACK, W.C. (1984). Multivariate Data Analysis, London: Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOIJTINK, H. (1998), “Constrained latent Class Analysis Using the Gibbs Sampler and Posterior Predictive P-values: Applications to Educational Testing”, Statistica Sinica 8, 691–711.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • HOIJTINK, H. (2000), “Posterior Inference in the Random Intercept Model Based on Samples Obtained with Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods”, Computational Statistics 15, 315–336.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • HOIJTINK, H.(2001), “Confirmatory Latent Class Analysis: Model Selection Using Bayes Factors and (Pseudo) Likelihood Ratio Statistics”, Multivariate Behavioral Research 36, 563–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HOIJTINK, H., and NOTENBOOM, A. (2004), “Model Based Clustering of Large Data Sets: Tracing the Development of Spelling Ability”, Psychometrika 69, 481–498.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • LIN, T.H., and DAYTON, C.M. (1997), “Model Selection Information Criteria for Nonnested Latent Class Models”, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 22, 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • LITTLE, R.J., and RUBIN, D.B. (2002), Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, NewYork: John Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • MACLACHLAN, D.L. and MULHERN, M. ( 2004), “Segment Optimization. An Empirical Comparison”, ESOMAR 2004 Conference Proceedings ESOMAR: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 289–308.

  • MENG, X.L. (1994), “Posterior Predictive P-values”, The Annals of Statistics 22, 1142–1160.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • NARAYANAN, A. (1990), “Computer Generation of Dirichlet Random Vectors”, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 36, 19–30.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • NEWCOMB, S. (1886), “A Generalized Theory of the Combination of Observations So As To Obtain the Best Result”, American Journal of Mathematics 8, 343–366.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • OPPENHUISEN, J. (2000), Een schaap in de bus? Een onderzoek naar waarden van de Nederlander (Dutch), Amsterdam: Grafische Producties.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEARSON, K. (1894), “Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Evolution”, Philosophical Transactions A185, 71–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • RICHARDSON, S., and GREEN, P.J. (1997), “On Bayesian Analysis of Mixtures with an Unknown Number of Components”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 59, 731–792.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • RUBIN, D.B. (1987), Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys, New York: John Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SCHAFER, J.L. (1997), Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data, London: Chapman and Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • SCHAFER, J.L., and GRAHAM, J.W. (2002), “Missing Data: Our View of the State of the Art”, Psychological Methods 7, 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STEVENS, M. (2000), “Dealing with Label Switching in Mixture Models”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 62, 795–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TER BRAAK, C.J.F., HOIJTINK, H., AKKERMANS, W., and VERDONSCHOT, P.F.M. (2003), “Bayesian Model-based Cluster Analysis for Predicting Macrofaunal Communities”, Ecological Modeling 160, 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VERMUNT, J.K., and MAGIDSON J. (2000), Latent Gold, Belmont: Statistical Innovations Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEDEL, M., and KAMAKURA, W.A. (2000), Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations”. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZEGER, S.L., and KARIM, M.R. (1991), “Generalized Linear Models with Random Effects: A Gibbs Sampling Approach”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 86, 79–86.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal van Hattum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Hattum, P., Hoijtink, H. Market Segmentation Using Brand Strategy Research: Bayesian Inference with Respect to Mixtures of Log-Linear Models. J Classif 26, 297–328 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-009-9040-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-009-9040-1

Key words

Navigation