Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hypotrochoid spiral optimization approach for sizing and layout optimization of truss structures with multiple frequency constraints

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary aim of this article is to present a new improved version of the spiral optimization algorithm (SPO) for shape and size optimization of truss structures under multiple frequency constraints. In the proposed method, which is named as hypotrochoid spiral optimization algorithm (HSPO), the movement operation of search points is redesigned, and mechanisms are utilized to boost the potency of the method in escaping from local optima and improving the accuracy of the results. Furthermore, a meta-optimization approach is developed by hybridizing the particle swarm optimization and the proposed technique for finding optimal parameter settings of the presented method. Thereafter, exploration and exploitation abilities of HSPO and SPO are compared by solving five benchmark design problems. Numerical results indicate that the convergence speed is enhanced, especially in the exploitation phase of the HSPO. The optimum designs found by the improved version are highly competitive with the best solutions reported in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grandhi R (1993) Structural optimization with frequency constraints—a review. AIAA J 31(12):2296–2303. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11928

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Gomes HM (2011) Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using a particle swarm algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 38(1):957–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2012) Truss optimization with natural frequency constraints using a hybridized CSS-BBBC algorithm with trap recognition capability. Comput Struct 102–103:14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lingyun W, Mei Z, Guangming W, Guang M (2005) Truss optimization on shape and sizing with frequency constraints based on genetic algorithm. Comput Mech 35(5):361–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-004-0623-8

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei L, Tang T, Xie X, Shen W (2011) Truss optimization on shape and sizing with frequency constraints based on parallel genetic algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(5):665–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0600-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2011) Shape and size optimization of truss structures with frequency constraints using enhanced charged system search algorithm. Asian J Civ Eng (Build Hous) 12(4):487–509

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2014) Comparison of nine meta-heuristic algorithms for optimal design of truss structures with frequency constraints. Adv Eng Softw 76:9–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lieu QX, Do DT, Lee J (2018) An adaptive hybrid evolutionary firefly algorithm for shape and size optimization of truss structures with frequency constraints. Comput Struct 195:99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dede T, Ayvaz Y (2015) Combined size and shape optimization of structures with a new meta-heuristic algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 28:250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaveh A, Javadi S (2014) Shape and size optimization of trusses with multiple frequency constraints using harmony search and ray optimizer for enhancing the particle swarm optimization algorithm. Acta Mech 225(6):1595–1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-013-1006-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tejani GG, Savsani VJ, Patel VK (2016) Adaptive symbiotic organisms search (SOS) algorithm for structural design optimization. J Comput Des Eng 3(3):226–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2016.02.003

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miguel LFF, Fadel Miguel LF (2012) Shape and size optimization of truss structures considering dynamic constraints through modern metaheuristic algorithms. Expert Syst Appl 39(10):9458–9467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaveh A, Ilchi Ghazaan M (2015) Hybridized optimization algorithms for design of trusses with multiple natural frequency constraints. Adv Eng Softw 79:137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Farshchin M, Camp CV, Maniat M (2016) Multi-class teaching–learning-based optimization for truss design with frequency constraints. Eng Struct 106:355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mortazavi A, Toğan V (2017) Sizing and layout design of truss structures under dynamic and static constraints with an integrated particle swarm optimization algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 51:239–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.11.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tejani GG, Savsani VJ, Bureerat S, Patel VK, Savsani P (2018) Topology optimization of truss subjected to static and dynamic constraints by integrating simulated annealing into passing vehicle search algorithms. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0612-8

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ho-Huu V, Nguyen-Thoi T, Truong-Khac T, Le-Anh L, Vo-Duy T (2018) An improved differential evolution based on roulette wheel selection for shape and size optimization of truss structures with frequency constraints. Neural Comput Appl 29(1):167–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2426-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheng M-Y, Prayogo D (2017) A novel fuzzy adaptive teaching–learning-based optimization (FATLBO) for solving structural optimization problems. Eng Comput 33(1):55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-016-0456-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamura K, Yasuda K (2011) Primary study of spiral dynamics inspired optimization. IEEJ Trans Electr Electron Eng 6:98–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/tee.20628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tamura K, Yasuda K (2011) Spiral dynamics inspired optimization. J Adv Comput Intell Intell Inform 15(8):1116–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tamura K, Yasuda K (2017) The spiral optimization algorithm: convergence conditions and settings. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2017.2695577

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaveh A, Mahdavi VR (2015) A hybrid CBO–PSO algorithm for optimal design of truss structures with dynamic constraints. Appl Soft Comput 34:260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nasir A, Tokhi MO (2015) An improved spiral dynamic optimization algorithm with engineering application. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 45(6):943–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tamura K, Yasuda K (2014) A parameter setting method for spiral optimization from stability analysis of dynamic equilibrium point. SICE J Control Meas Syst Integr 7(3):173–182. https://doi.org/10.9746/jcmsi.7.173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nasir A, Tokhi M (2013) A novel hybrid spiral-dynamics randomchemotaxis optimization algorithm with application to modelling of a flexible robot manipulator. In: Waldron KJ, Tokhi MO, Virk GS (eds) Nature-inspired mobile robotics. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 667–674. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814525534_0084

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Suzuki K, Tamura K, Yasuda K (2014) Study on cluster-structured spiral optimization. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC), 5–8 October 2014, pp 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2014.6973890

  27. Sidarto KA, Kania A (2015) Finding all solutions of systems of nonlinear equations using spiral dynamics inspired optimization with clustering. JACIII 19(5):697–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ouadi A, Bentarzi H, Recioui A (2013) Optimal multiobjective design of digital filters using spiral optimization technique. SpringerPlus 2(1):461. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Benasla L, Belmadani A, Rahli M (2014) Spiral optimization algorithm for solving combined economic and emission dispatch. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 62:163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.04.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Talbi E-G (2009) Metaheuristics: from design to implementation, vol 74. Wiley, New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470496916

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Eberhart R, Kennedy J A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Micro machine and human science, 1995. MHS’95. Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on, 1995. IEEE, pp 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MHS.1995.494215

  32. Bartz-Beielstein T, Preuss M Experimental research in evolutionary computation. In: Proceedings of the 9th annual conference companion on genetic and evolutionary computation, 2007. ACM, pp 3001–3020

  33. Wang D, Zhang WH, Jiang JS (2004) Truss optimization on shape and sizing with frequency constraints. AIAA J 42(3):622–630. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tejani GG, Savsani VJ, Patel VK, Mirjalili S (2018) Truss optimization with natural frequency bounds using improved symbiotic organisms search. Knowl Based Syst 143:162–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lin J, Che W, Yu Y (1982) Structural optimization on geometrical configuration and element sizing with statical and dynamical constraints. Comput Struct 15(5):507–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(82)90002-5

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2017) Truss shape and size optimization with frequency constraints using tug of war optimization. Asian J Civ Eng (Build Hous) 18(2):311–333

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kaveh A, Ilchi Ghazaan M (2015) Enhanced colliding bodies algorithm for truss optimization with frequency constraints. J Comput Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000445

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, P.O. Box 16846-13114, Tehran, Iran

    A. Kaveh & S. Mahjoubi

Authors
  1. A. Kaveh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Mahjoubi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kaveh.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaveh, A., Mahjoubi, S. Hypotrochoid spiral optimization approach for sizing and layout optimization of truss structures with multiple frequency constraints. Engineering with Computers 35, 1443–1462 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0675-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0675-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation