Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A hybrid sufficient performance measure approach to improve robustness and efficiency of reliability-based design optimization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stable convergence and efficiency of reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) using performance measure approach (PMA) are the major issue to develop the reliability methods based on modified chaos control (MCC), hybrid chaos control (HCC) and finite-step length adjustment (FSL). However, these methods may be inefficient for RBDO problems with convex and concave probabilistic constraints. In this paper, an adaptive modified chaos control (AMC) is proposed to provide the robust and efficient results in RBDO. The proposed AMC is adjusted using dynamical chaos control factor, which is extracted using sufficient descent condition for PMA. Using sufficient criterion, the proposed AMC is adaptively combined with advanced mean value (AMV) to improve the performance of PMA, named as hybrid adaptive modified chaos control (HAMC). Considering the robustness and efficiency, the proposed HAMC is compared with several existing reliability methods by three nonlinear structural/mathematical performance functions and two RBDO problems. The results indicate that the proposed HAMC with sufficient descent condition provides superior convergences in terms of both robustness and efficiency, compared to existing PMA methods using AMV, MCC, HCC and FSL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhu S-P, Hao Y-Z, Liao D (2019) Probabilistic modeling and simulation of multiple surface crack propagation and coalescence. Appl Math Model 78:383–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.09.045

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhu S, Liu Q, Zhou J, Yu Z (2018) Fatigue reliability assessment of turbine discs under multi-source uncertainties. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 41(6):1291–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang J, Xiao M, Gao L, Chu S (2019) A combined projection-outline-based active learning Kriging and adaptive importance sampling method for hybrid reliability analysis with small failure probabilities. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 344:13–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.003

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Koduru SD, Haukaas T (2010) Feasibility of FORM in finite element reliability analysis. Struct Saf 32(2):145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ping Y, Zuo Z (2016) Step length adjustment iterative algorithm for inverse reliability analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(4):1–11

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Keshtegar B, Zhu S-P (2019) Three-term conjugate approach for structural reliability analysis. Appl Math Model 76:428–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.06.022

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang J, Xiao M, Gao L, Fu J (2018) A novel projection outline based active learning method and its combination with Kriging metamodel for hybrid reliability analysis with random and interval variables. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 341:32–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.06.032

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Meng Z, Yang D, Zhou H, Yu B (2018) An accurate and efficient reliability-based design optimization using the second order reliability method and improved stability transformation method. Eng Optim 50(5):749–765

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Meng Z, Zhou H, Hu H, Keshtegar B (2018) Enhanced sequential approximate programming using second order reliability method for accurate and efficient structural reliability-based design optimization. Appl Math Model 62:562–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.06.018

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee I, Noh Y, Yoo D (2012) A novel second-order reliability method (SORM) using noncentral or generalized Chi squared distributions. J Mech Des 134(10):89. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Valdebenito MA, Schuëller GI (2010) A survey on approaches for reliability-based optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(5):645–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0518-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Du X, Chen W (2003) Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. J Mech Des 126(2):871–880

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zeng M, Zhou H (2018) New target performance approach for a super parametric convex model of non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 339:644–662

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang C, Qiu H, Li X, Chen Z, Gao L, Li P (2019) Iterative reliable design space approach for efficient reliability-based design optimization. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-00691-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi SH, Lee G, Lee I (2018) Adaptive single-loop reliability-based design optimization and post optimization using constraint boundary sampling. J Mech Sci Technol 32(7):3249–3262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fan L, Wu T, Badiru A, Hu M, Soni S (2013) A single-loop deterministic method for reliability-based design optimization. Eng Optim 45(4):435–458

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Keshtegar B, Hao P (2018) Enhanced single-loop method for efficient reliability-based design optimization with complex constraints. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57:1731–1747

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Liang J, Mourelatos ZP, Tu J (2008) A single-loop method for reliability-based design optimization. Int J Prod Dev 5(1/2):76–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shan S, Wang GG (2017) Reliable design space and complete single-loop reliability-based design optimization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(8):1218–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hao P, Ma R, Wang Y, Feng S, Wang B, Li G, Xing H, Yang F (2019) An augmented step size adjustment method for the performance measure approach: toward general structural reliability-based design optimization. Struct Saf 80:32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Keshtegar B (2017) A modified mean value of performance measure approach for reliability-based design optimization. Arab J Sci Eng 42(3):1093–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2322-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Youn BD, Choi KK, Du L (2005) Adaptive probability analysis using an enhanced hybrid mean value method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 29(2):134–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Peng H, Wang Y, Chen L, Bo W, Hao W (2017) A novel non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization algorithm using enhanced chaos control method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 318:572–593

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng G, Lin XU, Jiang L (2006) A sequential approximate programming strategy for reliability-based structural optimization. Comput Struct 84(21):1353–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang ZL, Jiang C, Zhou YS, Luo Z, Zhang Z (2016) An incremental shifting vector approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(3):523–543

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang ZL, Jiang C, Zhou YS, Zheng J, Long XY (2017) Reliability-based design optimization for problems with interval distribution parameters. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(2):1–16

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Li F, Liu J, Wen G, Rong J (2019) Extending SORA method for reliability-based design optimization using probability and convex set mixed models. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59(4):1163–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2120-2

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Gang L, Zeng M, Hao H (2015) An adaptive hybrid approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(5):1051–1065

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang C, Qiu H, Gao L, Cai X, Li P (2017) An adaptive hybrid single-loop method for reliability-based design optimization using iterative control strategy. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(6):1271–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1719-z

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Jeong SB, Park GJ (2016) Single loop single vector approach using the conjugate gradient in reliability based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(4):1329–1344

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Meng Z, Keshtegar B (2019) Adaptive conjugate single-loop method for efficient reliability-based design and topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 344:95–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.009

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Meng Z, Yang D, Zhou H, Wang BP (2018) Convergence control of single loop approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(3):1079–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1796-z

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Li X, Meng Z, Chen G, Yang D (2019) A hybrid self-adjusted single-loop approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 60(5):1867–1885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02291-x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Du X, Sudjianto A, Wei C (2004) An integrated framework for optimization under uncertainty using inverse reliability strategy. J Mech Des 126(4):562–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang D (2014) Stability analysis and convergence control of iterative algorithms for reliability analysis and design optimization. J Mech Des 135(3):034501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zeng M, Gang L, Bo PW, Peng H (2015) A hybrid chaos control approach of the performance measure functions for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 146:32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Keshtegar B, Baharom S, El-Shafie A (2018) Self-adaptive conjugate method for a robust and efficient performance measure approach for reliability-based design optimization. Eng Comput 34(1):187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0529-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Keshtegar B, Chakraborty S (2018) Dynamical accelerated performance measure approach for efficient reliability-based design optimization with highly nonlinear probabilistic constraints. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 178:69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.05.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hao P, Wang Y, Ma R, Liu H, Wang B, Li G (2019) A new reliability-based design optimization framework using isogeometric analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 345:476–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.008

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Keshtegar B, Hao P (2017) A hybrid self-adjusted mean value method for reliability-based design optimization using sufficient descent condition. Appl Math Model 41:257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.08.031

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Keshtegar B, Hao P (2018) Enriched self-adjusted performance measure approach for reliability-based design optimization of complex engineering problems. Appl Math Model 57:37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.12.030

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Keshtegar B, Lee I (2016) Relaxed performance measure approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(6):1439–1454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1561-8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhu S-P, Keshtegar B, Trung N-T, Yaseen ZM, Bui DT (2019) Reliability-based structural design optimization: hybridized conjugate mean value approach. Eng Comput https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00829-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Meng D, Li Y, Zhu S-P, Lv G, Correia J, Jesus Ad (2019) An enhanced reliability index method and its application in reliability-based collaborative design and optimization. Math Probl Eng 4536906:10

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Keshtegar B (2016) Stability iterative method for structural reliability analysis using a chaotic conjugate map. Nonlinear Dyn 84(4):2161–2174

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Keshtegar B (2017) A hybrid conjugate finite-step length method for robust and efficient reliability analysis. Appl Math Model 45:226–237

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Keshtegar B (2016) Chaotic conjugate stability transformation method for structural reliability analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 310:866–885

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Yaseen ZM, Keshtegar B (2019) Limited descent-based mean value method for inverse reliability analysis. Eng Comput 35(4):1237–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0661-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang J, Xiao M, Gao L, Qiu H, Yang Z (2018) An improved two-stage framework of evidence-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58(4):1673–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1991-6

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Keshtegar B, Kisi O (2018) RM5Tree: radial basis M5 model tree for accurate structural reliability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 180:49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.06.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhu S-P, Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang X-C (2018) Computational–experimental approaches for fatigue reliability assessment of turbine bladed disks. Int J Mech Sci 142:502–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Keshtegar B (2018) Enriched FR conjugate search directions for robust and efficient structural reliability analysis. Eng Comput 34(1):117–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0524-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Keshtegar B, Bagheri M (2018) Fuzzy relaxed-finite step size method to enhance the instability of the fuzzy first-order reliability method using conjugate discrete map. Nonlinear Dyn 91(3):1443–1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3957-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lee J-O, Yang Y-S, Ruy W-S (2002) A comparative study on reliability-index and target-performance-based probabilistic structural design optimization. Comput Struct 80(3):257–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00006-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Keshtegar B, Hao P (2018) A hybrid descent mean value for accurate and efficient performance measure approach of reliability-based design optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 336:237–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.03.006

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Keshtegar B, Peng H, Zeng M (2017) A self-adaptive modified chaos control method for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(1):63–75

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mi Xiao or Dieu Tien Bui.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keshtegar, B., Meng, D., Ben Seghier, M.E. et al. A hybrid sufficient performance measure approach to improve robustness and efficiency of reliability-based design optimization. Engineering with Computers 37, 1695–1708 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00907-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00907-w

Keywords

Navigation