Skip to main content
Log in

Deep emulational semi-supervised knowledge probability imaging method for plate structural health monitoring using guided waves

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deep networks can obtain the structural state features and optimize the parameters of the feature layer according to the training labels. The training data including the damage signals are quite helpful for detection model training, but sometimes the industrial damage signals are difficult to obtain, especially in airplane skin and other large structures. In this paper, a deep emulational semi-supervised probability imaging algorithm is proposed to present the damage state in the absence of damage samples. A promising signal generation method for simulated damage was implemented through signal encoding, ReLU activation and reconstruction with disturbance, and its effectiveness was verified in metal plate structures and anisotropic composite plate structures. The experiment results illustrate that the proposed method can detect the damage only using normal state signals, presents a good materials generalization in both aluminium plate and composite plate, and has better performance than other state-of-art methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chua CA, Cawley P, Nagy PB (2019) Scattering of the fundamental shear guided wave from a surface-breaking crack in plate-like structures. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 66(12):1887–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitra M, Gopalakrishnan S (2016) Guided wave based structural health monitoring: a review. Smart Mater Struct 25(5):053001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moll J, Kathol J, Fritzen CP et al (2019) Open guided waves: online platform for ultrasonic guided wave measurements. Struct Health Monit 18(5–6):1903–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen G, Guo Y, Katagiri T et al (2021) Multivariate probability of detection (POD) analysis considering the defect location for long-range, non-destructive pipe inspection using electromagnetic guided wave testing. NDT and E Int 124:102539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mei H, James R, Haider MF, Giurgiutiu V (2020) Multimode guided wave detection for various composite damage types. Appl Sci 10(2):484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong M, Mao Z, Todd MD, Su Z (2017) Uncertainty quantification for acoustic nonlinearity parameter in Lamb wave-based prediction of barely visible impact damage in composites. Mech Syst Signal Process 82:448–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan A, Kim N, Shin JK et al (2019) Damage assessment of smart composite structures via machine learning: a review. JMST Adv 1(1):107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mardanshahi A, Nasir V, Kazemirad S et al (2020) Detection and classification of matrix cracking in laminated composites using guided wave propagation and artificial neural networks. Compos Struct 246(112403):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Z, Huang S, Shen G et al (2022) High resolution tomography of pipeline using multi-helical Lamb wave based on compressed sensing. Constr Build Mater 317:125628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peng Z, Jian J, Wen H et al (2020) Distributed fiber sensor and machine learning data analytics for pipeline protection against extrinsic intrusions and intrinsic corrosions. Opt Express 28(19):27277–27292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiménez AA, Zhang L, Muñoz CQG et al (2020) Maintenance management based on Machine Learning and nonlinear features in wind turbines. Renewable Energy 146:316–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harley JB, Alguri KS, Tetali HV et al (2019) Learning guided wave dispersion curves from multi-path reflections with compressive sensing. Struct Health Monit. https://doi.org/10.12783/shm2019/32388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu ZH, Peng QL, Li X et al (2020) Acoustic emission source localization with generalized regression neural network based on time difference mapping method. Exp Mech 60(5):679–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ebrahimkhanlou A, Salamone S (2018) Single-sensor acoustic emission source localization in plate-like structures using deep learning. Aerospace 5(50):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xu L, Yuan S, Chen J et al (2019) Guided wave-convolutional neural network based fatigue crack diagnosis of aircraft structures. Sensors 19(3567):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  16. Alguri KS, Chia CC, Harley JB (2021) Sim-to-Real: Employing ultrasonic guided wave digital surrogates and transfer learning for damage visualization. Ultrasonics 111:106338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Su C, Jiang M, Lv S et al (2019) Improved damage localization and quantification of CFRP using Lamb waves and convolution neural network. IEEE Sens J 19(14):5784–5791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang B, Hong X, Liu Y (2021) Distribution adaptation deep transfer learning method for cross-structure health monitoring using guided waves. Struct Health Monit 21:14759217211010708

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mao J, Wang H, Spencer BF Jr (2020) Toward data anomaly detection for automated structural health monitoring: Exploiting generative adversarial nets and autoencoders. Struct Health Monit 1475921720924601:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lei X, Sun L, Xia Y (2020) Lost data reconstruction for structural health monitoring using deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. Struct Health Monit 1475921720959226:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xiong J, Chen J (2019) A generative adversarial network model for simulating various types of human-induced loads. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 19(08):1950092 (1-21)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang B, Hong X, Liu Y (2020) Multi-task deep transfer learning method for guided wave-based integrated health monitoring using piezoelectric transducers. IEEE Sens J 20(23):14391–14400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huthwaite P, Simonetti F (2013) High-resolution guided wave tomography. Wave Motion 50(5):979–993

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Hay TR, Royer RL, Gao H (2006) A comparison of embedded sensor Lamb wave ultrasonic tomography approaches for material loss detection. Smart Mater Struct 15(4):946–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Prasad SM, Balasubramaniam K, Krishnamurthy CV (2004) Structural health monitoring of composite structures using Lamb wave tomography. Smart Mater Struct 13(5):N73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khodaei ZS, Aliabadi MH (2014) Assessment of delay-and-sum algorithms for damage detection in aluminium and composite plates. Smart Mater Struct 23(7):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen Z, He G, Li J et al (2020) Domain adversarial transfer network for cross-domain fault diagnosis of rotary machinery. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 69(11):8702–8712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang R, Li J, Liao Y et al (2020) Deep adversarial capsule network for compound fault diagnosis of machinery toward multidomain generalization task. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 70:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liao Y, Huang R, Li J et al (2020) Deep semi-supervised domain generalization network for rotary machinery fault diagnosis under variable speed. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 69(10):8064–8075

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li J, Huang R, He G et al (2020) A two-stage transfer adversarial network for intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery with multiple new faults. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 26:1591–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu Y, Hong X, Zhang B (2020) A novel velocity anisotropy probability imaging method using ultrasonic guided waves for composite plates. Measurement 166:108087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang B, Hong X, Liu Y (2021) Deep convolutional neural network probability imaging for plate structural health monitoring using guided waves. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 70(2510610):1–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51975220, the National key Research and development program under Grant No. 2019YFB1804200, Guangdong Province Science & Technology project under Grant no. 2018B010109005 and Guangdong Outstanding Youth Fund under Grant No. 2019B151502057, the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities project under Grant No. 2019ZD23.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaobin Hong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial or non-financial interests that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, B., Yang, D., Hong, X. et al. Deep emulational semi-supervised knowledge probability imaging method for plate structural health monitoring using guided waves. Engineering with Computers 38, 4151–4166 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01711-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01711-9

Keywords

Navigation