Abstract
Given the number of joints and muscles in the human body, there are typically an infinite number of ways to perform the same action, a feature of directed movements known as equifinality (Bernstein, The coordination and regulation of movements, Oxford, Pergamon, 1967). Here we present a new type of performance analysis based on the idea of a body-goal variability mapping. We show how this mapping arises naturally from the idea of a goal function that theoretically defines a task and, in the presence of equifinality, determines the set of all possible task solution strategies, the goal equivalent manifold (GEM). The approach also yields estimates of the sensitivity of goal-level errors to body-level perturbations, and we derive a general formula expressing the relationship between the two. We apply these ideas to the analysis of redundant kinematic data from subjects performing an aiming task carried out with and without a laser pointer. It is shown that in order to characterize performance one must consider two factors in addition to the body variability: first, the degree of alignment between body variability and the GEM; and second, the sensitivity parameters that control the degree to which goal-relevant body variability is amplified at the target. Both of these factors can be computed using the estimated body-goal mapping. We show that the performance for three conditions involving two different nominal postures and two different sensory conditions (laser/no laser) can be classified by examining the clustering of data in an orientation- sensitivity parameter plane associated with the map.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balasubramaniam R, Riley M, Turvey M (2000) Specificity of postural sway to the demands of a precision task. Gait Posture 11:12–24
Bernstein N (1967) The coordination and regulation of movements. Oxford, Pergamon
Chen Y, Ding, M, Kelso JAS (1997) Long memory processes (1/f type) in human coordination. Phys Rev Let 79:4501–4504
Danion F, Varraine E, Bonnard M, Pailhous J (2003) Stride variability in human gait: the effect of stride frequency and stride length. Gait Posture 18:69–77
Dingwell JB, Cusumano J (2000) Nonlinear time series analysis of normal and pathological human walking. Chaos 10:848–863
Domkin D, Laczko J, Jaric S, Johansson H, Latsh M (2002) Structure of joint variability in bimanual pointing task. Exp Brain Res 143:11–23
Duarte M, Zatsiorsky VM (2000) On the fractal properties of natural human standing. Neurosci Lett 283:173–176
Golub G, Van Loan C (1996) Matrix computations. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Marylands
Haggard P, Hutchinson K, Stein J (1995) Patterns of coordinated multi-joint movement. Exp Brain Res 107:254–266
Hausdorff J, Peng C, Ladin Z, Wei J, Goldberger A (1994) Is walking a random walk? Evidence for long-range correlations. J Appl Physiol 78:349–358
Jolliffe I (1986) Principal component analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Kelso JAS, Tuller B, Vatikoitis-Bateson E, Fowler C (1984) Functionally specific cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 10:812–832
Latash M (2000) There is no motor redundancy in human movements. There is motor abundance. Motor Control, 4:259–260
Mardia K, Kent J, Bibby J (1979) Multivariate analysis. Academic Press, London
Masani K, Kouzaki M, Fukunaga T (2002) Variability of ground reaction forces during treadmill walking. J Applied Physiol 92:1885–1890
Müller H, Sternad D (2003) A randomization method for the calculation of covariation of multiple non linear relations: illustrated with the example of goal-directed movements. Biol Cybern 89:22–33
Müller H, Sternad D (2004) Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: Three components of skill improvement. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30(1):212–233
Newell K, Corcos D (eds) (1993) Variability and motor control. Human Kinetics, Champaign IL
Newell KM, Vaillancourt DE (2001) Dimensional change in motor learning. Hum Mov Sci 20:695–715
Owings TM, Grabiner MD (2004) Variability of step kinematics in young and older adults. Gait Posture 20:26–29
Scholz J, Schöner G (1999) The uncontrolled manifold concept. Exp Brain Res 126:289–306
Scholz J, Schöner G, Latash M (2000) Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting. Exp Brain Res 135:382–404
Slifkin AB, Vaillancourt DE, Newell KM (2000) Intermittency in the control of continuous force production. J Neurophysiol 84:1708–1718
Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5:1226–1235
Vaillancourt D, Larsson L, Newell K (2003) Effects of aging on force variability, motor unit discharge patterns, and the structure of 10, 20, and 40 hz emg activity. Neurobiol Aging 24:25–35
Vereijken B, Emmerik R, Whiting H, Newell K (1992) Free(z)ing degrees of freedom in skill acquisition. J Motor Behav 24:133–142
Winter DA (1984) Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: variability and compensating effects. Hum Mov Sci 3:51–76
Yoshinaga H, Miyazima S, Mitake S (2000) Fluctuation of biological rhythm in finger tapping. Physica A 280:582–586
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cusumano, J.P., Cesari, P. Body-goal Variability Mapping in an Aiming Task. Biol Cybern 94, 367–379 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-006-0052-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-006-0052-1