Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An implementation of reinforcement learning based on spike timing dependent plasticity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An explanatory model is developed to show how synaptic learning mechanisms modeled through spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) can result in long-term adaptations consistent with reinforcement learning models. In particular, the reinforcement learning model known as temporal difference (TD) learning has been used to model neuronal behavior in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) of macaque monkey during reinforcement learning. While some research has observed, empirically, a connection between STDP and TD, there has not been an explanatory model directly connecting TD to STDP. Through analysis of the learning dynamics that results from a general form of a STDP learning rule, the connection between STDP and TD is explained. We further demonstrate that a STDP learning rule drives the spike probability of a reward predicting neuronal population to a stable equilibrium. The equilibrium solution has an increasing slope where the steepness of the slope predicts the probability of the reward, similar to the results from electrophysiological recordings suggesting a different slope that predicts the value of the anticipated reward of Montague and Berns [Neuron 36(2):265–284, 2002]. This connection begins to shed light into more recent data gathered from VTA and OFC which are not well modeled by TD. We suggest that STDP provides the underlying mechanism for explaining reinforcement learning and other higher level perceptual and cognitive function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bi Q, Mu-Ming P (1998) Precise spike timing determines the direction and extent of synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 18:10,464–10,472

    Google Scholar 

  • Daw ND, Dayan P (2004) Neuroscience. Matchmaking. Science 304(5678): 1753–1754

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman DE (2000) Timing-based LTP and LTD at vertical inputs to layer II/III—pyramids in rat cortex. Neuron 27: 45–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Froemke RC, Dan Y (2002) Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains. Nature 416(6879): 433–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houk J, Davis J, Beiser D (1995) Models of information processing in the basal ganglia. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Izhikevich EM (2007) Solving the distal reward problem through linkage of stdp and dopamine signaling. Cereb Cortex 17(10): 2443–2452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klopf A (1988) A neuronal model for classical conditioning. Psychobiology 16: 85–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosko B (l986) Differential Hebbian learning. In: Denker JS (ed) AIP Conference Proceedings 151: Neural Networks for Computing. American Institute of Physics, New York, pp 277–288

  • Markram H, Lübke J, Frotscher M, Sakmann B (1997) Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science 275: 213–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montague P, Berns G (2002) Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation. Neuron 36(2): 265–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montague PR, Dayan P, Sejnowski TJ (1996) A framework for mesencephalic dopamine systems based on predictive Hebbian learning. J Neurosci 16(5): 1936–1947

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morris G, Nevet A, Arkadir D, Vaadia E, Bergman H (2006) Midbrain dopamine neurons encode decisions for future action. Nat Neurosci 9: 1057–1063

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niv Y, Duff MO, Dayan P (2005) Dopamine, uncertainty and TD learning. Behav Brain Funct 1: 6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otani S, Daniel H, Roisin MP, Crepel F (2003) Dopaminergic modulation of long-term synaptic plasticity in rat prefrontal neurons. Cereb Cortex 13(11): 1251–1256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak V, Kerr J (2008) Dopamine receptor activation is required for corticostriatal spike-timing-dependent plasticity. J Neurosci 28(10): 2435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao RPN, Sejnowski TJ (2000) Predictive sequence learning in recurrent neocortical circuits. In: Solla SA, Leen TK, Muller KR(eds) Advances in neural information processing systems, vol 12. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 164–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts PD (1999) Computational consequences of temporally asymmetric learning rules: I. Differential Hebbian learning. J Compu Neurosci 7: 235–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts PD (2004) Recurrent biological neural networks: the weak and noisy limit. Phys Rev E 69: 031910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts PD, Bell CC (2000) Computational consequences of temporally asymmetric learning rules: II. Sensory image cancellation. J Compu Neurosci 9: 67–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR (1997) A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275: 1593–1598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song S, Miller KD, Abbott LF (1993) Competitive hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Nature Neurosci 3: 919–926

    Google Scholar 

  • Suri R, Schultz W (2001) Temporal difference model reproduces anticipatory neural activity. Neural Comput 13: 841–862

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998) Reinforcement learning: an introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay L, Schultz W (1999) Relative reward preference in primate orbitofrontal cortex. Nature 398(6729): 661–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waelti P, Dickinson A, Schultz W (2001) Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory. Nature 412: 43–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wörgötter F, Porr B (2005) Temporal sequence learning, prediction, and control: a review of different models and their relation to biological mechanisms. Neural Comput 17(2): 245–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick D. Roberts.

Additional information

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants No. IOB-0445648 (PDR) and DMS-0408334 (GL) and by a Career Support grant from Portland State University (GL).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, P.D., Santiago, R.A. & Lafferriere, G. An implementation of reinforcement learning based on spike timing dependent plasticity. Biol Cybern 99, 517–523 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-008-0265-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-008-0265-6

Keywords

Navigation