Abstract
While hopping, 12 subjects experienced a sudden step down of 5 or 10 cm. Results revealed that the hopping style was “terrain following”. It means that the subjects pursued to keep the distance between maximum hopping height (apex) and ground profile constant. The spring-loaded inverse pendulum (SLIP) model, however, which is currently considered as template for stable legged locomotion would predict apex-preserving hopping, by which the absolute maximal hopping height is kept constant regardless of changes of the ground level. To get more insight into the physics of hopping, we outlined two concepts of energy management: “constant energy supply”, by which in each bounce—regardless of perturbations—the same amount of mechanical energy is injected, and “lost energy supply”, by which the mechanical energy that is going to be dissipated in the current cycle is assessed and replenished. When tested by simulations and on a robot testbed capable of hopping, constant energy supply generated stable and robust terrain following hopping, whereas lost energy supply led to something like apex-preserving hopping, which, however, lacks stability as well as robustness. Comparing simulated and machine hopping with human hopping suggests that constant energy supply has a good chance to be used by humans to generate hopping.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altendorfer R, Saranli U, Komsuoglu H, Koditschek D, Brown H, Buehler M, Moore N, McMordie D, Full R (2001) Evidence for spring loaded inverted pendulum running in a hexapod robot. Exp Robot 20(VII):291–302
Andrews B, Miller B, Schmitt J, Clark JE (2011) Running over unknown rough terrain with a one-legged planar robot. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 6(2):026009. doi:10.1088/1748-3182/6/2/026009
Blickhan R (1989) The spring-mass model for running and hopping. J Biomech 22(11–12): 1217–1227
Blickhan R, Seyfarth A, Geyer H, Grimmer S, Wagner H, Günther M (2007) Intelligence by mechanics. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1850): 199–220
Buschmann T, Lohmeier S, Ulbrich H (2009) Humanoid robot lola: design and walking control. J Physiol 103(3–5): 141–148
Cham J, Bailey S, Cutkosky M (2000) Robust dynamic locomotion through feedforward–preflex interaction. ASME IMECE Proceedings, Orlando
Dempster W (1955) Space requirements of the seated operator. WADC Technical Report 55159 (WADC-55-159, AD-087-892), pp 55–159
Full R, Koditschek D (1999) Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land. J Exp Biol 202(23): 3325–3332
Gerritsen K, van den Bogert A, Hulliger M, Zernicke R et al (1998) Intrinsic muscle properties facilitate locomotor control—a computer simulation study. Motor Control 2(3): 206–220
Geyer H, Seyfarth A, Blickhan R (2003) Positive force feedback in bouncing gaits. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 270(1529): 2173
Guckenheimer J, Holmes P (1990) Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields vol 42. Springer, New York
Haeufle D, Grimmer S, Seyfarth A (2010) The role of intrinsic muscle properties for stable hopping: stability is achieved by the force–velocity relation. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 5: 016004
Hirose M, Ogawa K (2007) Honda humanoid robots development. Philos Trans R Soc A 365(1850): 11–19
Kalveram K (1991) Pattern generating and reflex-like processes controlling aiming movements in the presence of inertia, damping and gravity. Biol Cybern 64(5): 413–419
Kalveram K, Seyfarth A (2009) Inverse biomimetics: how robots can help to verify concepts concerning sensorimotor control of human arm and leg movements. J Physiol 103(3–5): 232–243
Kalveram K, Schinauer T, Beirle S, Richter S, Jansen-Osmann P (2005) Threading neural feedforward into a mechanical spring: how biology exploits physics in limb control. Biol Cybern 92(4): 229–240
Maus H, Lipfert S, Gross M, Rummel J, Seyfarth A (2010) Upright human gait did not provide a major mechanical challenge for our ancestors. Nat Commun 1: 70
Maus H, Seyfarth A, Grimmer S (2011) Combining forces and kinematics for calculating consistent centre of mass trajectories. J Exp Biol 214(21): 3511–3517
Mittelstaedt H (1957) Recent advantages in invertebrate physiology—a symposium. Chap: Prey capture in Mantida. University of Oregon Publications, Eugene, pp 51–71
Mittelstaedt H (1990) The perception and control of self-motion. Chap: Basic solutions to the problem of head-centric visual localization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 267–286
Paul C (2006) Morphological computation: a basis for the analysis of morphology and control requirements. Robot Auton Syst 54(8): 619–630
Pelc E, Daley M, Ferris D (2008) Resonant hopping of a robot controlled by an artificial neural oscillator. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 3:026001
Pfeifer R, Iida F (2004) Embodied artificial intelligence: trends and challenges. In: Iida F et al. (eds) Embodied artificial intelligence, LNCS/AI vol 3139. Springer, pp 1–26
Pfeiffer F (2007) The tum walking machines. Philos Trans R Soc A 365(1850): 109–131
Poincaré H (1892) Les méthodes nouvelles de la mécanique céleste, vol I. Gauthier-villars, Paris (English translation: Goroff DL (ed) New methods in celestial mechanics, 1993)
Rad H, Gregorio P, Buehler M (1993) Design, modeling and control of a hopping robot. In: Intelligent Robots and Systems’ 93, IROS’93. In: Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE/RSJ international conference, vol 3, pp 1778–1785
Raibert MH (1984) Hopping in legged systems—modeling and simulation for the two-dimensional one-legged case. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 14(3): 451–463
Rummel J, Seyfarth A (2008) Stable running with segmented legs. Int J Robot Res 27(8): 919–934
Saranlı U, Arslan Ö, Ankaralı M, Morgül Ö (2010) Approximate analytic solutions to non-symmetric stance trajectories of the passive spring-loaded inverted pendulum with damping. Nonlinear Dyn 62(4): 729–742
Schmitt J, Clark JE (2009) Modeling posture-dependent leg actuation in sagittal plane locomotion. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 4(4):46005
Sciavicco L, Siciliano B (2000) Modelling and control of robot manipulators. Springer, London
Seipel J, Holmes P (2005) Running in three dimensions: analysis of a point-mass sprung-leg model. Int J Robot Res 24(8): 657–674
Seyfarth A, Kalveram K, Geyer H (2007) Simulating muscle-reflex dynamics in a simple hopping robot. In: Berns K, Luksch T (eds) Autonome Mobile Systeme. Springer, Berlin, pp 294–300
van Soest A, Bobbert M (1993) The contribution of muscle properties in the control of explosive movements. Biol Cybern 69(3): 195–204
Wagner H, Blickhan R (1999) Stabilizing function of skeletal muscles: an analytical investigation. J Theor Biol 199(2): 163–179
Winter D (2009) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Wiley, New York
Winters J (1990) Multiple muscle systems: biomechanics and movement organization. Chap Hill-based muscle models: a systems engineering perspective. Springer, New York, pp 69–93
Winters J (1995) An improved muscle-reflex actuator for use in large-scale neuromusculoskeletal models. Ann Biomed Eng 23(4): 359–374
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalveram, K.T., Haeufle, D.F.B., Seyfarth, A. et al. Energy management that generates terrain following versus apex-preserving hopping in man and machine. Biol Cybern 106, 1–13 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-012-0476-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-012-0476-8