Abstract
In this paper, we present a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method for evaluating a set of fashion oriented industrial products in order to design new products meeting specific market requirements. Human perceptions at two levels (basic product perception and complex fashion perception), evaluated by a group of evaluators, have been integrated into the related evaluation procedure. For a specific product, the three first fuzzy evaluation criteria are its conformity degrees related to the specific consumer’s requirement in fashion themes, basic product perception and functional properties. The degree of conformity between the basic product perception and the complex fashion perception, and the price of the product constitute the two remaining evaluation criteria. The previous conformity degrees are formalized according to the measures of dissimilarity between products as well as dissimilarity and inclusion between different fashion themes. The weights of the evaluation criteria are linguistic variables generated from the results of market classification obtained by a parametric identification method. These weights can effectively characterize the relationship between sales volumes of products and their components (price, fashion style, physical features, and basic perception). Finally, the set of all existing products can be evaluated and ranked by aggregating the previous fuzzy evaluation criteria with linguistic weights. The proposed fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation method has been applied to select the most relevant industrial products for different markets. Moreover, as the general aggregated evaluation criterion can be considered as a quality function of design parameters (functional properties, basic and fashion complex perceptions) for a specific market, we can estimate this function by evaluating all existing products in order to design new consumer oriented products.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belliveau P, Griffin A, Somermeyer S (2004) PDMA ToolBook 2 for new product development. Wiley, New York
Chang HC, Dong L, Liu FX, Lu WF (2000) Indexing and retrieval in machining process planning using case-based reasoning. Artif Intell Eng 14:1–13
Cheng CB (2003) A fuzzy inference system for similarity assessment in case-based reasoning systems: an application to product design. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 385–394
Chiu Y, Chen B, Shyu J, Tzeng G (2006) An evaluation model of new product launch strategy. Technovation 26:1244–1252
Goldstone RL, Steyvers M, Spencer-Smith J, Kersten A (2000) Interactions between perceptual and conceptual learning. In: Diettrich E, Markman AB (eds) Cognitive dynamics: conceptual change in humans and machines. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 191–228
Keeney R, Lilien G (1987) New industrial product design and evaluation using multiattribute value analysis. J Prod Innov Manag 4(3):185–198
Liberatore JM, Stylianou CM (1995) Expert support systems for new product development decision making: a modeling framework and applications. Manag Sci 41(8):1296–1316
Lu J, Zhang G, Ruan D, Wu F (2007) Multi-objective group decision making: methods, software and applications with fuzzy set technology. Imperial College Press, London
Maher ML, Gomez de Silva Garza A (1996) Developing a case-based reasoning for structural design. IEEE Expert 11(n°3):42–52
Renaud J, Levrat E, Fonteix C (2008) Weights determination of OWA operators by parametric identification. Math Comput Simul 77:499–511
Tsaur SH, Tzeng GH, Wang KC (1997) Evaluating tourist risks from fuzzy perspectives. Ann Tour Res 24(4):796–812
Tzeng GH, Tsaur SH (1993) Application of multicriteria decision making to old vehicle elimination in Taiwan. Energy Environ 40(3):265–283
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zeng, X., Zhu, Y., Koehl, L. et al. A fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation method for designing fashion oriented industrial products. Soft Comput 14, 1277–1285 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0496-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0496-z