Abstract
Considering that the stock returns distribution displays leptokurtosis as well as left-skewed properties, and the returns volatility process exhibits heteroscedasticity as well as clustering effects, the asymmetric GARCH-type models with non-Gaussian distributions (AGARCH-nG) are employed to describe the volatility process. In addition, the AGARCH-nG models are hybridized with artificial neural network (ANN) technique for forecasting stock returns volatility. Since the least square support vector machine (LS-SVM) technique displays strong forecast ability, we present an improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO) algorithm to optimize the parameters of LS-SVM technique in the process of stock returns volatility prediction. Then, we compare the forecasting performances of individual AGARCH-nG models, the hybrid AGARCH-nG-ANN methods and the data mining-based LS-SVM-IPSO method using stock markets data. The empirical results verify the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method, which demonstrates that the LS-SVM-IPSO approach outperforms the AGARCH-type models with non-Gaussian distributions and those integrating with the artificial neural network methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abounoori E, Elmi Z, Nademi Y (2016) Forecasting Tehran stock exchange volatility; Markov switching GARCH approach. Phys A 445:264–282
Abualigah LM, Khader AT (2017) Unsupervised text feature selection technique based on hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm with genetic operators for the text clustering. J Supercomput 73(11):4773–4795
Abualigah LM, Khader AT, Hanandeh ES (2018) A new feature selection method to improve the document clustering using particle swarm optimization algorithm. J Comput Sci 25:456–466
Alberg D, Shalit H, Yosef R (2008) Estimating stock market volatility using asymmetric GARCH models. Appl Financ Econ 18:1201–1208
Bentes SR (2015a) A comparative analysis of the predictive power of implied volatility indices and GARCH forecasted volatility. Phys A 424:105–112
Bentes SR (2015b) Forecasting volatility in gold returns under the GARCH, IGARCH and FIGARCH frameworks: new evidence. Phys A 424:355–364
Bildirici M, Ersin ÖÖ (2009) Improving forecasts of GARCH family models with the artificial neural networks: an application to the daily returns in Istanbul Stock Exchange. Expert Syst Appl 36:7355–7362
Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return. Rev Econ Stat 69:542–547
Cheng CH, Wei LY (2009) Volatility model based on multi-stock index for TAIEX forecasting. Expert Syst Appl 36:6187–6191
Choudhary MA, Haider A (2012) Neural network models for inflation forecasting: an appraisal. Appl Econ 44:2631–2635
Chuang IY, Lu JR, Lee PH (2007) Forecasting volatility in the financial markets: a comparison of alternative distributional assumptions. Appl Financ Econ 17:1051–1060
Dai Q, Ma Z, Xie QY (2014) A two-phased and ensemble scheme integrated backpropagation algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 24:1124–1135
Dhamija AK, Bhalla VK (2010) Financial time series forecasting: comparison of neural networks and ARCH models. Int Res J Finance Econ 49:185–202
Fang F, Jonsson H, Oosterlee K, Schoutens W (2010) Fast valuation and calibration of credit default swaps under Lévy dynamics. J Comput Finance 14:57–86
Göçken M, Özçalici M, Boru A, Dosdoğru AT (2016) Integrating metaheuristics and Artificial Neural Networks for improved stock price prediction. Expert Syst Appl 44:320–331
Hajizadeh E, Seifi A, Fazel MH, Zarandi Turksen IB (2012) A hybrid modeling approach for forecasting the volatility of S&P 500 index return. Expert Syst Appl 39:431–436
Ince H, Cebeci AF, Imamoglu SZ (2017) An artificial neural network-based approach to the monetary model of exchange rate. Comput Econ 2:1–15
Ismail S, Shabri A, Samsudin R (2011) A hybrid model of self-organizing maps (SOM) and least square support vector machine (LSSVM) for time series forecasting. Expert Syst Appl 38:10574–10578
Kristjanpoller W, Minutolo MC (2016) Forecasting volatility of oil price using an artificial neural network-GARCH model. Expert Syst Appl 65:233–241
Kristjanpoller W, Fadic A, Minutolo MC (2014) Volatility forecast using hybrid Neural Network models. Expert Syst Appl 41:2437–2442
Lahmiri S (2016a) Interest rate next-day variation prediction based on hybrid feedforward neural network, particle swarm optimization, and multiresolution techniques. Phys A 444:388–396
Lahmiri S (2016b) A variational mode decompoisition approach for analysis and forecasting of economic and financial time series. Expert Syst Appl 55:268–273
Lahmiri S (2017) Modeling and predicting historical volatility in exchange rate markets. Phys A 471:387–395
Liu F, Zhou ZG (2015) A new data classification method based on chaotic particle swarm optimization and least square-support vector machine. Chem Intel Lab Syst 147:147–156
Lv XD, Shan X (2013) Modeling natural gas market volatility using GARCH with different distributions. Phys A 392:5685–5699
Monfared SA, Enke D (2015) Noise canceling in volatility forecasting using an adaptive neural network filter. Procedia Comput Sci 61:80–84
Nelson DB (1991) Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econometrica 59:347–370
Pehlivanoglu YV (2013) A new particle swarm optimization method enhanced with a periodic mutation strategy and neural networks. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 17:436–452
Qiu M, Song Y, Akagi F (2016) Application of artificial neural network for the prediction of stock market returns: the case of the Japanese stock market. Chaos Sol Fract 85:1–7
Ramyar S, Kianfar F (2017) Forecasting crude oil prices: a comparison between artificial neural networks and vector autoregressive models. Comput Econ 1:1–19
Rojo-Álvarez JL, Martínez-Ramón M, Muñoz-Marí J, Camps-Valls G (2014) A unified SVM framework for signal estimation. Digital Sign Proc 26:1–20
Suykens JAK, Gestel TV, Brabanter JD, Moor BD, Vandewalle J (2002) Least square support vector machines. World Scientific, Singapore
Tseng CH, Cheng ST, Wang YH (2009) New hybrid methodology for stock volatility prediction. Expert Syst Appl 36:1833–1839
Yang S, Lee J (2012) Multi-basin particle swarm intelligence method for optimal calibration of parametric Lévy models. Expert Syst Appl 39:482–493
Zahedi J, Rounaghi MM (2015) Application of artificial neural network models and principal component analysis method in predicting stock prices on Tehran Stock Exchange. Phys A 438:178–187
Zhao J, Yang ZJ, Xu YT (2016) Nonparallel least square support vector machine for classification. Appl Intel 45:1119–1128
Zhao D, Huang C, Wei Y, Yu F, Wang M, Chen H (2017) An effective computational model for bankruptcy prediction using kernel extreme learning machine approach. Comput Econ 49:325–341
Zhu DM, Galbraith JW (2010) A generalized asymmetric Student-t distribution with application to financial econometrics. J Econometrics 157:297–305
Zhu DM, Galbraith JW (2011) Modeling and forecasting expected shortfall with the generalized asymmetric Student-t and asymmetric exponential power distributions. J Emp Finance 18:765–778
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 18BGL200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71532009), Research funding of Qingdao University (No. 41118010080).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animals rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Communicated by V. Loia.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gong, XL., Liu, XH., Xiong, X. et al. Forecasting stock volatility process using improved least square support vector machine approach. Soft Comput 23, 11867–11881 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-03743-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-03743-0