Skip to main content
Log in

Forecasting stock volatility process using improved least square support vector machine approach

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considering that the stock returns distribution displays leptokurtosis as well as left-skewed properties, and the returns volatility process exhibits heteroscedasticity as well as clustering effects, the asymmetric GARCH-type models with non-Gaussian distributions (AGARCH-nG) are employed to describe the volatility process. In addition, the AGARCH-nG models are hybridized with artificial neural network (ANN) technique for forecasting stock returns volatility. Since the least square support vector machine (LS-SVM) technique displays strong forecast ability, we present an improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO) algorithm to optimize the parameters of LS-SVM technique in the process of stock returns volatility prediction. Then, we compare the forecasting performances of individual AGARCH-nG models, the hybrid AGARCH-nG-ANN methods and the data mining-based LS-SVM-IPSO method using stock markets data. The empirical results verify the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method, which demonstrates that the LS-SVM-IPSO approach outperforms the AGARCH-type models with non-Gaussian distributions and those integrating with the artificial neural network methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abounoori E, Elmi Z, Nademi Y (2016) Forecasting Tehran stock exchange volatility; Markov switching GARCH approach. Phys A 445:264–282

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Abualigah LM, Khader AT (2017) Unsupervised text feature selection technique based on hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm with genetic operators for the text clustering. J Supercomput 73(11):4773–4795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abualigah LM, Khader AT, Hanandeh ES (2018) A new feature selection method to improve the document clustering using particle swarm optimization algorithm. J Comput Sci 25:456–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberg D, Shalit H, Yosef R (2008) Estimating stock market volatility using asymmetric GARCH models. Appl Financ Econ 18:1201–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentes SR (2015a) A comparative analysis of the predictive power of implied volatility indices and GARCH forecasted volatility. Phys A 424:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentes SR (2015b) Forecasting volatility in gold returns under the GARCH, IGARCH and FIGARCH frameworks: new evidence. Phys A 424:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bildirici M, Ersin ÖÖ (2009) Improving forecasts of GARCH family models with the artificial neural networks: an application to the daily returns in Istanbul Stock Exchange. Expert Syst Appl 36:7355–7362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return. Rev Econ Stat 69:542–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng CH, Wei LY (2009) Volatility model based on multi-stock index for TAIEX forecasting. Expert Syst Appl 36:6187–6191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary MA, Haider A (2012) Neural network models for inflation forecasting: an appraisal. Appl Econ 44:2631–2635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang IY, Lu JR, Lee PH (2007) Forecasting volatility in the financial markets: a comparison of alternative distributional assumptions. Appl Financ Econ 17:1051–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai Q, Ma Z, Xie QY (2014) A two-phased and ensemble scheme integrated backpropagation algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 24:1124–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhamija AK, Bhalla VK (2010) Financial time series forecasting: comparison of neural networks and ARCH models. Int Res J Finance Econ 49:185–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang F, Jonsson H, Oosterlee K, Schoutens W (2010) Fast valuation and calibration of credit default swaps under Lévy dynamics. J Comput Finance 14:57–86

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Göçken M, Özçalici M, Boru A, Dosdoğru AT (2016) Integrating metaheuristics and Artificial Neural Networks for improved stock price prediction. Expert Syst Appl 44:320–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajizadeh E, Seifi A, Fazel MH, Zarandi Turksen IB (2012) A hybrid modeling approach for forecasting the volatility of S&P 500 index return. Expert Syst Appl 39:431–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ince H, Cebeci AF, Imamoglu SZ (2017) An artificial neural network-based approach to the monetary model of exchange rate. Comput Econ 2:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail S, Shabri A, Samsudin R (2011) A hybrid model of self-organizing maps (SOM) and least square support vector machine (LSSVM) for time series forecasting. Expert Syst Appl 38:10574–10578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjanpoller W, Minutolo MC (2016) Forecasting volatility of oil price using an artificial neural network-GARCH model. Expert Syst Appl 65:233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjanpoller W, Fadic A, Minutolo MC (2014) Volatility forecast using hybrid Neural Network models. Expert Syst Appl 41:2437–2442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahmiri S (2016a) Interest rate next-day variation prediction based on hybrid feedforward neural network, particle swarm optimization, and multiresolution techniques. Phys A 444:388–396

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lahmiri S (2016b) A variational mode decompoisition approach for analysis and forecasting of economic and financial time series. Expert Syst Appl 55:268–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahmiri S (2017) Modeling and predicting historical volatility in exchange rate markets. Phys A 471:387–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Zhou ZG (2015) A new data classification method based on chaotic particle swarm optimization and least square-support vector machine. Chem Intel Lab Syst 147:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv XD, Shan X (2013) Modeling natural gas market volatility using GARCH with different distributions. Phys A 392:5685–5699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monfared SA, Enke D (2015) Noise canceling in volatility forecasting using an adaptive neural network filter. Procedia Comput Sci 61:80–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DB (1991) Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econometrica 59:347–370

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pehlivanoglu YV (2013) A new particle swarm optimization method enhanced with a periodic mutation strategy and neural networks. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 17:436–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu M, Song Y, Akagi F (2016) Application of artificial neural network for the prediction of stock market returns: the case of the Japanese stock market. Chaos Sol Fract 85:1–7

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ramyar S, Kianfar F (2017) Forecasting crude oil prices: a comparison between artificial neural networks and vector autoregressive models. Comput Econ 1:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojo-Álvarez JL, Martínez-Ramón M, Muñoz-Marí J, Camps-Valls G (2014) A unified SVM framework for signal estimation. Digital Sign Proc 26:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suykens JAK, Gestel TV, Brabanter JD, Moor BD, Vandewalle J (2002) Least square support vector machines. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng CH, Cheng ST, Wang YH (2009) New hybrid methodology for stock volatility prediction. Expert Syst Appl 36:1833–1839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Lee J (2012) Multi-basin particle swarm intelligence method for optimal calibration of parametric Lévy models. Expert Syst Appl 39:482–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahedi J, Rounaghi MM (2015) Application of artificial neural network models and principal component analysis method in predicting stock prices on Tehran Stock Exchange. Phys A 438:178–187

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Yang ZJ, Xu YT (2016) Nonparallel least square support vector machine for classification. Appl Intel 45:1119–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao D, Huang C, Wei Y, Yu F, Wang M, Chen H (2017) An effective computational model for bankruptcy prediction using kernel extreme learning machine approach. Comput Econ 49:325–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu DM, Galbraith JW (2010) A generalized asymmetric Student-t distribution with application to financial econometrics. J Econometrics 157:297–305

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu DM, Galbraith JW (2011) Modeling and forecasting expected shortfall with the generalized asymmetric Student-t and asymmetric exponential power distributions. J Emp Finance 18:765–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 18BGL200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71532009), Research funding of Qingdao University (No. 41118010080).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xi-Hua Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animals rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, XL., Liu, XH., Xiong, X. et al. Forecasting stock volatility process using improved least square support vector machine approach. Soft Comput 23, 11867–11881 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-03743-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-03743-0

Keywords

Navigation